Conquer Club

a discussion about SJW's

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Which one tops the cake?

Feminazi's
0
No votes
Fat acceptance movement
1
13%
Black lives Matter
2
25%
Multiculturalists
0
No votes
Cultural war against games & movies
1
13%
LGBTQ
4
50%
 
Total votes : 8

a discussion about SJW's

Postby waauw on Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:26 am

Seems relevant considering opinions on here.
User avatar
Lieutenant waauw
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby mrswdk on Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:19 am

I give it maximum two weeks before waauw starts spamming OT with pepe frogs.
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:09 am

Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.
show


Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show


Boggles the fuckin mind.
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Bernie Sanders on Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:34 am

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.
show


Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show


Boggles the fuckin mind.


The above post boggles the mind.

Image

Too many young white guys are so upset that they are losing their WHITE PRIVILEGE.

Stop your whining and crying DDS or I might have to send you to bed. Grow a couple and for GODSAKE! stop your whimpering!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby waauw on Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:01 am

mrswdk wrote:I give it maximum two weeks before waauw starts spamming OT with pepe frogs.


Image
User avatar
Lieutenant waauw
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby waauw on Fri Aug 11, 2017 8:05 am

I don't know about you people, but the Fat Acceptance groups are definitely the most hilarious.

User avatar
Lieutenant waauw
 
Posts: 4756
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby tzor on Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:24 pm

You are missing a whole number of groups.
If they were on the list I would vote for the Anti-Fa
They make great cake toppers.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Symmetry on Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:12 pm

To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Image
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Skoffin on Tue Aug 15, 2017 2:41 am

Hams down it's the fat acceptance movement.
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby 2dimes on Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:26 am

Skoffin wrote:Hams down it's the fat acceptance movement.


Mm mm ham.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13092
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Thorthoth on Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:46 am

All the heads of the hydra are attached to the same body... and yes, it is fat.
THORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTHORTHOTH
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Corporal Thorthoth
 
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 1:36 pm
Location: My pyramid in Asgard, beside the glaciated Nile.

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:46 pm

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.
show


Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show


Boggles the fuckin mind.


Don't fret. The nature of extremist political views is such that the pendulum will swing and leave them in the dust soon enough.

But maybe there will be a real war and things will shake up all the softness.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby TA1LGUNN3R on Tue Aug 15, 2017 7:50 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:
The above post boggles the mind.

Image

Too many young white guys are so upset that they are losing their WHITE PRIVILEGE.

Stop your whining and crying DDS or I might have to send you to bed. Grow a couple and for GODSAKE! stop your whimpering!


Self-loathing cunt. Go be a meek turd and lickspittle, it's all you're good at.

-TG
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TA1LGUNN3R
 
Posts: 2699
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:52 am
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby luns101 on Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:33 pm

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.
show


Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show


Boggles the fuckin mind.


Pretty much spot on, young man. Although I'd support safe spaces for craft beer sampling.
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby riskllama on Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:07 pm

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Image

up yer kilt? or something like that, right?
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8976
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby mrswdk on Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:58 am

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Image


Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:23 am

mrswdk wrote:Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.

And China has bread lines and violently puts protests down. (Ghulja/Tiananmen Square Incident). Because China gives two shits about it's populace.

Go ho somewhere else.
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby mrswdk on Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:54 am

>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby DirtyDishSoap on Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:36 am

mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017

>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class DirtyDishSoap
 
Posts: 9273
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby mrswdk on Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:41 am

DirtyDishSoap wrote:
mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017

>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017


Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Symmetry on Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:43 pm

mrswdk wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote:
mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017

>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017


Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.


Oh dear, don't get upset when the shoe is on the other foot in mouth, mrs.

I may be mixing my metaphors, but dear god, I love it.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby tzor on Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:13 pm

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Image


Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.

Most people do not understand where Fascism came from. (From the failed to materialize revolutions that Marxism had predicted.) They don't know how it evolved to "national" socialism as opposed to the "international - class based" socialism of Communism. They don't understand the tactics of fascists. As a result it isn't obvious to them that the anti-fa is in fact a Fascist organization (that can't even make the trains run on time).
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Symmetry on Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:00 pm

tzor wrote:
Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Image


Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.

Most people do not understand where Fascism came from. (From the failed to materialize revolutions that Marxism had predicted.) They don't know how it evolved to "national" socialism as opposed to the "international - class based" socialism of Communism. They don't understand the tactics of fascists. As a result it isn't obvious to them that the anti-fa is in fact a Fascist organization (that can't even make the trains run on time).


That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence that he was opposed to democracy and in favour of the Fascist states that he lead a country to war against than your usual confused nonsense on this one.

It's a big claim you're making, after all.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby mrswdk on Thu Aug 24, 2017 7:51 am

Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence


Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.

In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.


https://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: a discussion about SJW's

Postby Symmetry on Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:33 pm

mrswdk wrote:
Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence


Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.

In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.


https://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/


Gwydion Williams? Never heard of the guy. Opinions aren't evidence MR.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap