Moderator: Community Team








Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
The above post boggles the mind.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:Spoiler
Boggles the fuckin mind.Spoiler

mrswdk wrote:I give it maximum two weeks before waauw starts spamming OT with pepe frogs.




Mm mm ham.Skoffin wrote:Hams down it's the fat acceptance movement.
Don't fret. The nature of extremist political views is such that the pendulum will swing and leave them in the dust soon enough.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:Spoiler
Boggles the fuckin mind.Spoiler
Self-loathing cunt. Go be a meek turd and lickspittle, it's all you're good at.Bernie Sanders wrote:
The above post boggles the mind.
Too many young white guys are so upset that they are losing their WHITE PRIVILEGE.
Stop your whining and crying DDS or I might have to send you to bed. Grow a couple and for GODSAKE! stop your whimpering!
Pretty much spot on, young man. Although I'd support safe spaces for craft beer sampling.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.
Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".
Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.
It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.
It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.
These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:Spoiler
Boggles the fuckin mind.Spoiler
up yer kilt? or something like that, right?Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:
And China has bread lines and violently puts protests down. (Ghulja/Tiananmen Square Incident). Because China gives two shits about it's populace.mrswdk wrote: Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.DirtyDishSoap wrote:>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
Oh dear, don't get upset when the shoe is on the other foot in mouth, mrs.mrswdk wrote:Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.DirtyDishSoap wrote:>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017
Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence that he was opposed to democracy and in favour of the Fascist states that he lead a country to war against than your usual confused nonsense on this one.tzor wrote:Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:
Most people do not understand where Fascism came from. (From the failed to materialize revolutions that Marxism had predicted.) They don't know how it evolved to "national" socialism as opposed to the "international - class based" socialism of Communism. They don't understand the tactics of fascists. As a result it isn't obvious to them that the anti-fa is in fact a Fascist organization (that can't even make the trains run on time).
Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence
https://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.
In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.
Gwydion Williams? Never heard of the guy. Opinions aren't evidence MR.mrswdk wrote:Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidencehttps://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.
In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.