Beating anyone by 1 is much harder than beating someone by 13. When you win by one every move takes on huge significance. When you are ahead by so many games that you win by 13, if you mis-click a fort move, you figure its not going to be catastrophic. You want to be the guy that misdeploys or mis-clicks when you lose by 1? I sure in the hell don't. I don't know anyone who does.
Tss, ok, so my previous comment was only friendly pre-war banter; I do not really except us to beat FALL by "a lot" ( I'll try to do so but who knows).
I dunno if beating TSM by 13 is more an exploit than beating ACE by 1. What I know for sure, is that it is quite an achievement to be in the half finale of a CCcup for LHDD. And I believe it is the same for FALL.
But your comment, rockfist, is silly. Beating someone by 13 is much harder than beating someone by 1.
If tomorrow TOFU face LHDD, do you think it will be more impressive than TOFU beat LHDD by 1 game, or by 13?
If you beat us by 1 game, it means we actually have the same level, if you beat us with a 10+ game difference, it means you were, during this war at least, better than us.
A victory by 1 game, is ultimately, imo, a victory by luck, both clans could have win the war, and it came down to a few lucky rolls, because in any way, there is definitely more than 1 game decided by dices in any war. While a victory with a large margin, as I said, means you were better.
Surely, when the war is very tight until the end, there is much more pressure on the last games, but it doesn't mean winning by 1 game is much harder than winning by 10+ game
