spelt wrote:After checking my dice stats i find i have -40+ attack results! So i can not win a roll so why should i buy a membership. Every one who works for CC go ahead and right your BS now because i will be asking this every day

I don't work for CC, but I'll respond anyway.
First of all, the dice stats for your previous 5-25 battles are completely meaningless, so don't even look at them if it upsets you. You have to look at data for 1000's of rolls before you can get any useful information, and unfortunately they don't give us the ability to do that. It would be nice if there was an option to log your dice rolls the way poker sites store your hand histories, but I doubt that will ever happen. In any case, your overall dice stats are fine, so your problem is not with the dice.
So if the dice are not the problem, then what is? You might want to think about how often you are attacking with poor odds. Here are your stats when attacking 1v1, 2v2 and 1v2, compared to a sample of other players:



Not only do these attacks have a winning probability of less than 50%, so you are losing more troops than you kill, but they also leave your territories poorly defended, so it's easy for your opponent to take them right back. In the case of a 1v2 attack, you only have a 10.6% chance of taking the territory, and that's assuming the defender
only has 2 troops. Also, because these values are a percentage of all attacks you make, there is a corresponding reduction in your percentage of 3v2 attacks, as seen here:

And while 2v1 attacks do give you good odds (57.87%), they also leave you with no defense, so they should be used judiciously. Not like this:

I'm aware that heads-up players use these types of attacks to end a lost game quickly, but I don't think that explains why your stats are so far from the norm. It looks like you just prefer to attack until you have no troops left. You can't blame that on the dice.