
That there's some good airbrushing.
Oh my.greenoaks wrote:![]()
Moderator: Community Team
All up to your personal taste. Xeno posts women that are more attractive to me than the ones covered in tattoos.notyou2 wrote:Not only that, but respect the title too. IE: for you sickfuck simpletons, that means 18+ because girls that look under 18 AREN'T HOT & SEXY!!!!ender516 wrote:Eww, I threw up a little with that one. Please, respect the rule: women only, as per OP.
notyou2 wrote:Not only that, but respect the title too. IE: for you sickfuck simpletons, that means 18+ because girls that look under 18 AREN'T HOT & SEXY!!!!ender516 wrote:Eww, I threw up a little with that one. Please, respect the rule: women only, as per OP.
*shrug* I'd have hit that 15 years ago, and my tastes haven't changed that much... I just know better than to do more than look and walk awayGillipig wrote:lol, so no one under 18 is sexy according to you guys? I don't think you even believe in that yourselves. Perhaps it's the sort of thing you tell yourself to push away "bad" or "naughty" thoughts? You guys are such hypocrites. I'd do this girl if I got the chance and so would you, only difference is that I don't twist my panties over the fact that she's not an adult. You're all a bunch of sad closet jailbait lovers.
John Adams wrote:I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three or more become a Congress! And by God I have had this Congress!
Gillipig wrote:Moar!
you have posted in the wrong thread Andy. this is the HOT + SEXY thread. let me show you how it's done.AndyDufresne wrote:
--Andy




Those girls are all retarded.xeno wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfuE_9gBkPc
I didn't like the last three... ;/greenoaks wrote:(Pictures)
greenoaks wrote: Candice Swanepoel
![]()

I like a HOT + SEXY with some brains and nerdism.greenoaks wrote:you have posted in the wrong thread Andy. this is the HOT + SEXY thread. let me show you how it's done.AndyDufresne wrote:
--Andy
n doesn't say much. n can be "1" for example, which would imply that you don't think it's an improvement at all. If you're going to go all nerdy like Andy, I suggest you replace n with π, or ∞ if you really think an unbuttoned top would lift the pic to new heights.crispybits wrote:Pic would have been x^n times better if that top button was undone imo

Why is she wearing a giant shower scrub on her head?Gillipig wrote:
Catwalks always crack me up lol. Or, I get a boner, either way I win!

Agreed.warmonger1981 wrote:Miranda Kerr ... yum ...yum ..
Agreed.AndyDufresne wrote:I like a HOT + SEXY with some brains and nerdism.greenoaks wrote:you have posted in the wrong thread Andy. this is the HOT + SEXY thread. let me show you how it's done.AndyDufresne wrote:
--Andy
--Andy
Actually if n was zero then there would be no improvement as x^0 is always 1. x^1 is x, which is unknown. Take care with your nerdism when the Tech Team is watching.Gillipig wrote:n doesn't say much. n can be "1" for example, which would imply that you don't think it's an improvement at all. If you're going to go all nerdy like Andy, I suggest you replace n with π, or ∞ if you really think an unbuttoned top would lift the pic to new heights.crispybits wrote:Pic would have been x^n times better if that top button was undone imo
And to stay on topic:
I thought it was a dish mop. Get in the kitchen and make me a sammich.notyou2 wrote:Why is she wearing a giant shower scrub on her head?Gillipig wrote:
Catwalks always crack me up lol. Or, I get a boner, either way I win!
She likes to get down and dirty.notyou2 wrote:Why is she wearing a giant shower scrub on her head?Gillipig wrote:
Catwalks always crack me up lol. Or, I get a boner, either way I win!