Moderator: Community Team

saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Sorry, I didn't realize it was merely scene flavor. I thought you were trying to softclaim a mason role.MeDeFe wrote:Claiming masons?

I have a better idea. I'm gonna claim now. I'm Osiris. God of the underworld. Third party mason with Rodion, Aken the ferryman. My role is that I can revive rodion whenever he dies.Victor Sullivan wrote:so I think I'm going to go back to the case on Mr. Squirrel, which never really got resolved: vote Mr. Squirrel.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
saf wrote:I think the case on Sully is sound logic MeDeFe, but I also would add that deadline pressure does tend to force bandwagon building either way. The problem I see right now is the large number of less active people who will seriously lower our ability to get to lynches later on in the game. But for now, I'm willing to follow the case.
vote Victor Sullivan
He supports MeDeFe on a previous day, then later claims the case on Victor isn't great, which I find interesting because of the public opinions that have swayed in the time lapsed. When he voted for Victor, Violet had not yet soft-cleared him, and MeDeFe wasn't under any suspicion yet. Now that Victor is "cleared" by Vio (which must be some flavor info or something since she's claimed that she's been roleblocked both nights) and MeDeFe is under pressure he's flip-flopped.Sully- Again with the pressuring or something about voting, not really seeing anything there.

Lol. Even today I didn't see this happening. If it is an obvious stalemate for the remainder of the day I will advance to night with a no lynch rather then force everyone to wait a week.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:motherfuckinggoddamnit.
-Tails
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

Change your vote already, motherfucker, we haven't lost yet.jonty125 wrote:Sorry guys
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
No.strike wolf wrote:It's a stalemate for the day. Edoc already announced he'll move the game to night w/a no lynch rather than drag it out.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Exactly why I did it. Recently I was wondering why you never see the third party siding with the scum. I looked at this game and figured out how beneficial it would be if I did. No matter what, us third-party guys could win so long as we claimed. This way is just the safest way to do so.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Victor is not town... The setup that Squirrel posted is probably correct. Without Squirrel's help, we can't win this. And if he sides with scum, he wins tonight, instead of a long drawn out possible win (which would require careful planning on any protects/switches that town may have--just general luck) with town. So it's definitely in Squirrel's interest to side with scum rather than town because just one more townie has to die so that scum+3rd party win, whereas if he decided to side with town, we'd have to lynch a scum, probably lose a townie, which would make it 3 town, 2 scum, 2 third party (upon rez of Rodion). Then wash-repeat, lynch scum tomorrow, lose townie, which would leave 2 town, 1 scum, 2 third party. At that point it'd come down to who Squirrel and Rodion want to win, but it would drag the game out.
tl;dr Town loses due to expedience.
-Tails
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Half right. Anubis is but Ammit is not. I am Sokar (bulletproof). I'll let vic and Saf decide if they want to say who they are respectively.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Exactly why I did it. Recently I was wondering why you never see the third party siding with the scum. I looked at this game and figured out how beneficial it would be if I did. No matter what, us third-party guys could win so long as we claimed. This way is just the safest way to do so.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Victor is not town... The setup that Squirrel posted is probably correct. Without Squirrel's help, we can't win this. And if he sides with scum, he wins tonight, instead of a long drawn out possible win (which would require careful planning on any protects/switches that town may have--just general luck) with town. So it's definitely in Squirrel's interest to side with scum rather than town because just one more townie has to die so that scum+3rd party win, whereas if he decided to side with town, we'd have to lynch a scum, probably lose a townie, which would make it 3 town, 2 scum, 2 third party (upon rez of Rodion). Then wash-repeat, lynch scum tomorrow, lose townie, which would leave 2 town, 1 scum, 2 third party. At that point it'd come down to who Squirrel and Rodion want to win, but it would drag the game out.
tl;dr Town loses due to expedience.
-Tails
Also, scum guys, did I get my two guesses right on the scum members (anubis and ammit)? I haven't brushed up on my ancient egyptian mythology in a while, but thats what the scenes made it sound like.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Ok. Last night when "Death" devoured my mate's heart, I just assumed it was Ammit. Anubis fed the hearts of the unworthy to ammit according to legend.strike wolf wrote:Half right. Anubis is but Ammit is not. I am Sokar (bulletproof). I'll let vic and Saf decide if they want to say who they are respectively.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Vote Count
Mr. S (2) ~ Safari, Victor, Victor
Victor (1) ~ MeDeFe
MeDeFe (1) ~ Safari, Jonty
No lynch (2) ~ Strike, Mr. S
8 alive 5 to lynch
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
we have effectivley unvote vote StrikeMeDeFe wrote:Change your vote already, motherfucker, we haven't lost yet.jonty125 wrote:Sorry guys
