cena-rules wrote:not much use doing anything until there is more active people
Thats bull cena. This comment alone has made me suspicious of you. It doesnt matter how many players there are in a game, discussion is always necessary. Explain yourself
By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.
Why not have serious discussions? Even if we dont have everyone participating, there is still a high chance that at least one of us is scum. This game should continue just like a smaller game would. If all scum were deadbeating, i would assume the mod would be a lot more adamant in making sure there are replacements. After all, having a bunch of townies lynching each other ruins the point of the game. unvote vote cena. Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.
On the other hand, wercool hasn't made an impression of being the world's best organized GM, so though your deductions are logical, the empirical data is a bit shaky.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
cena-rules wrote:not much use doing anything until there is more active people
Thats bull cena. This comment alone has made me suspicious of you. It doesnt matter how many players there are in a game, discussion is always necessary. Explain yourself
By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.
Why not have serious discussions? Even if we dont have everyone participating, there is still a high chance that at least one of us is scum. This game should continue just like a smaller game would. If all scum were deadbeating, i would assume the mod would be a lot more adamant in making sure there are replacements. After all, having a bunch of townies lynching each other ruins the point of the game. unvote vote cena. Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.
On the other hand, wercool hasn't made an impression of being the world's best organized GM, so though your deductions are logical, the empirical data is a bit shaky.
QFT
I am still here for voting vodean off the island. Either he is scum, or we will kill a player who will inevitably submarine.
Edoc'sil
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
doesn't look like we have enough people playing to even get a vote, not even if we all agreed. DO you suppose we could get some prodding for the inactive ones?
Edoc'sil
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
At this point, I have no idea who to vote for.. :/
And forgive me, but the last game I was in, Star wars mafia, really screwed up my idea of how mafia games worked. Is this game similar?
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
hmm.... I wonder if it would be improper to start with a joke vote at this point. vote duday53, The Dark Side clouds everything. Impossible to see, the future is
So mystery man has voted for me, what could this be? I mean it looks like a politician, but don't need to steal someone's vote at night first? Maybe just a freaking secret voter.
duday53 wrote:Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
edocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
no
neither?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
edocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
no
neither?
I believe the no was to using a no lynch to progress the game...
How would a quick no lynch progress the game?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
spiesr wrote:So mystery man has voted for me, what could this be? I mean it looks like a politician, but don't need to steal someone's vote at night first? Maybe just a freaking secret voter.
duday53 wrote:Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
That sounds a lot like inactivity...
That's true.. Haha. But if you think about the storyline of Eragon. It is similar to Star Wars. And the mod already killed a survivor... so I think there might be quite a few of those.
And thanks for the vote / :p
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
edocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
no
neither?
I believe the no was to using a no lynch to progress the game...
How would a quick no lynch progress the game?
I meant no to the 'no lynch'. i guess i should have clarified. I have never seen a no lynch actually contribute anything day 2. I'm no vet, but i've played quite a bit on a few different sites.
Thezzaruz wrote:He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.
Skimming is better than random so UnVote and Vote Mr. Squirrel.
Sorry, but my opinion still stands. Just because not everyone is here doesnt mean we cant lynch someone or decide anything. If later on someone becomes active and changes our decision, thats fine. Mafia is a dynamic game with politics constantly changing. I just dont want this game to go dead on day 1. I hate it when that happens
MeDeFe wrote:How would a quick no lynch progress the game?
It would cause the game to move to night and then day 2. The game would progress from day 1 to day 2. I am not advocating this, however as it does little good.
Thezzaruz wrote:He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.
Skimming is better than random so UnVote and Vote Mr. Squirrel.
Sorry, but my opinion still stands. Just because not everyone is here doesnt mean we cant lynch someone or decide anything. If later on someone becomes active and changes our decision, thats fine. Mafia is a dynamic game with politics constantly changing. I just dont want this game to go dead on day 1. I hate it when that happens
What's the rush??? This game took over 3 weeks of real time to go from role-PMs until Day 1 started. Give people a chance to realise we're up and running.