Moderator: Community Team
On the other hand, wercool hasn't made an impression of being the world's best organized GM, so though your deductions are logical, the empirical data is a bit shaky.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Why not have serious discussions? Even if we dont have everyone participating, there is still a high chance that at least one of us is scum. This game should continue just like a smaller game would. If all scum were deadbeating, i would assume the mod would be a lot more adamant in making sure there are replacements. After all, having a bunch of townies lynching each other ruins the point of the game. unvote vote cena. Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.cena-rules wrote:By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Thats bull cena. This comment alone has made me suspicious of you. It doesnt matter how many players there are in a game, discussion is always necessary. Explain yourselfcena-rules wrote:not much use doing anything until there is more active people
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:On the other hand, wercool hasn't made an impression of being the world's best organized GM, so though your deductions are logical, the empirical data is a bit shaky.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Why not have serious discussions? Even if we dont have everyone participating, there is still a high chance that at least one of us is scum. This game should continue just like a smaller game would. If all scum were deadbeating, i would assume the mod would be a lot more adamant in making sure there are replacements. After all, having a bunch of townies lynching each other ruins the point of the game. unvote vote cena. Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.cena-rules wrote:By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Thats bull cena. This comment alone has made me suspicious of you. It doesnt matter how many players there are in a game, discussion is always necessary. Explain yourselfcena-rules wrote:not much use doing anything until there is more active people
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
so mod would you be so kind as to provide a vote count and tell us what the problem waswercool wrote:im soppused to do that. and i think ive figured out the voaden double role problem.
my vote is supposed to be on cena. see my post abovewercool wrote:cena-rules 2 spiesr naxus
vodean 1 edocsil
gregwolf 1 safariguy
edocsil 2 gregwolf mr squirrel
naxus 1 cena-rules
17 alive 9 to lynch
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
That sounds a lot like inactivity...duday53 wrote:Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I believe the no wasMeDeFe wrote:neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
How would a quick no lynch progress the game?spiesr wrote:I believe the no wasMeDeFe wrote:neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
to using a no lynch to progress the game...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
That's true.. Haha. But if you think about the storyline of Eragon. It is similar to Star Wars. And the mod already killed a survivor... so I think there might be quite a few of those.spiesr wrote:So mystery man has voted for me, what could this be? I mean it looks like a politician, but don't need to steal someone's vote at night first? Maybe just a freaking secret voter.That sounds a lot like inactivity...duday53 wrote:Just thought I would post and let you guys know I'm not inactive. I only come on Conquer Club for the mafia.. I don't play any games. So I often forget I'm in this game. Especially because the last time I checked this people were still confirming.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Silence and panic is usually to be expected on Day 1.gregwolf121 wrote:so any ideas or leads or are we all just supposed to be giving each other the silent treatment
He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Why not have serious discussions? ... Trying to stem discussion is always scummy, no exception.cena-rules wrote: By doing anything, I mean voting or serious large decisions.
Would you mind indicating so on the first page, the list is pretty useless if it isn't up to date.wercool wrote:okay vodean problem has been taken care of and vodean's second role (3rd party surviver) has been killed.
I meant no to the 'no lynch'. i guess i should have clarified. I have never seen a no lynch actually contribute anything day 2. I'm no vet, but i've played quite a bit on a few different sites.MeDeFe wrote:How would a quick no lynch progress the game?spiesr wrote:I believe the no wasMeDeFe wrote:neither?Mr. Squirrel wrote:noedocsil wrote:this is impossible to do anything day1 with so few people. Do we just want to do a quick no lynch? Progress the game?
to using a no lynch to progress the game...
Sorry, but my opinion still stands. Just because not everyone is here doesnt mean we cant lynch someone or decide anything. If later on someone becomes active and changes our decision, thats fine. Mafia is a dynamic game with politics constantly changing. I just dont want this game to go dead on day 1. I hate it when that happensThezzaruz wrote:He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.
Skimming is better than random so UnVote and Vote Mr. Squirrel.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
It would cause the game to move to night and then day 2. The game would progress from day 1 to day 2. I am not advocating this, however as it does little good.MeDeFe wrote:How would a quick no lynch progress the game?
What's the rush??? This game took over 3 weeks of real time to go from role-PMs until Day 1 started. Give people a chance to realise we're up and running.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Sorry, but my opinion still stands. Just because not everyone is here doesnt mean we cant lynch someone or decide anything. If later on someone becomes active and changes our decision, thats fine. Mafia is a dynamic game with politics constantly changing. I just dont want this game to go dead on day 1. I hate it when that happensThezzaruz wrote:He said decisions not discussions, quite a big difference I'd say.
Skimming is better than random so UnVote and Vote Mr. Squirrel.