Moderator: Community Team
chaosfactor wrote:jefjef wrote:10 flames. mmmm.
cotton44
tergatman777
woodroof
sassytoxic
Army of DOG
lex1951
altergrin
BibBallibStallion
AAFlips
Nasty_Head
Honorable mention
GENERAL STONEHAM
ronc
owen whats his name
???? Are we talking about the flame wars that was in Conquer-club?
A big shout out for Jef for posting up 13 non entities and showing his ignorance.
You missed it pal, sorry.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
billy07 wrote:prowler was always my favourite, just for entertainment value. watching a grown man breakdown over things said on the net was a fascinating insight into how weak and sensitive people can be.
anarkistdream was also good for a laugh. the self-professed king of spelling soon got lost when somebody put a few correctly spelled words together though.
mustard, suggs, norse, bk barunt, herpes were all good flamers. nobody else is worth a mention and are the reason flame wars became boring, eventually leading to it's demise. well perhaps the_lion, 99.5% of his posts were complete rubbish but he did come out with a couple of decent flames.
Gold Knight wrote:GS, id like to point out that not once in the entirety of his post did he mention you or anyone else's name, so it is in fact you that is baiting/flaming/whatever you'd like to call it. He is stating his opinion on FW, which he has every right to do, and the fact that he posted after you is does not imply it was directed at you. The second half of your post is fine, you can cry "passive aggressive" bullshit arguements all you'd like, as it is just as rightfully an opinion as was Fitz's. But you really need to get over looking for a fight with Fitz, and realize that being one of the most active posters here, there arent a whole lotta places he isnt going to post. You arent victimized, youre victimizing yourself. Let's pull on our big-boy trousers and grow up a bit...
And its people like this why flame wars would be such a joke today. When players like ron or DM got a ban for something they said, they didnt come back and cry about their mistreatment; they acted as if nothing happened and continued to entertain the public without crossing the same boundry. FW was here for shock and entertainment value, as very rarely were the flames actually directed for someone's gameplay, which is why i understand why it was taken off the site.
Gold Knight wrote:GS, id like to point out that not once in the entirety of his post did he mention you or anyone else's name, so it is in fact you that is baiting/flaming/whatever you'd like to call it. He is stating his opinion on FW, which he has every right to do, and the fact that he posted after you is does not imply it was directed at you. The second half of your post is fine, you can cry "passive aggressive" bullshit arguements all you'd like, as it is just as rightfully an opinion as was Fitz's. But you really need to get over looking for a fight with Fitz, and realize that being one of the most active posters here, there arent a whole lotta places he isnt going to post. You arent victimized, youre victimizing yourself. Let's pull on our big-boy trousers and grow up a bit...
And its people like this why flame wars would be such a joke today. When players like ron or DM got a ban for something they said, they didnt come back and cry about their mistreatment; they acted as if nothing happened and continued to entertain the public without crossing the same boundry. FW was here for shock and entertainment value, as very rarely were the flames actually directed for someone's gameplay, which is why i understand why it was taken off the site.
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Gold Knight wrote:GS, id like to point out that not once in the entirety of his post did he mention you or anyone else's name, so it is in fact you that is baiting/flaming/whatever you'd like to call it. He is stating his opinion on FW, which he has every right to do, and the fact that he posted after you is does not imply it was directed at you. The second half of your post is fine, you can cry "passive aggressive" bullshit arguements all you'd like, as it is just as rightfully an opinion as was Fitz's. But you really need to get over looking for a fight with Fitz, and realize that being one of the most active posters here, there arent a whole lotta places he isnt going to post. You arent victimized, youre victimizing yourself. Let's pull on our big-boy trousers and grow up a bit...
And its people like this why flame wars would be such a joke today. When players like ron or DM got a ban for something they said, they didnt come back and cry about their mistreatment; they acted as if nothing happened and continued to entertain the public without crossing the same boundry. FW was here for shock and entertainment value, as very rarely were the flames actually directed for someone's gameplay, which is why i understand why it was taken off the site.
Yes! Just like Big Whiskey, you come running to aid your Clan buddy AA. viewtopic.php?f=239&t=116012
Very sweet indeed. Yep, we have Big Whiskey and now YOU to continue the harrassment and baiting that AA Fitz has started.
It's so nice we have posters like yourself playing the role of the Morality Police.
What would we do with-out the Thought Police?
No FLAMES here,
GS
GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Gold Knight wrote:GS, id like to point out that not once in the entirety of his post did he mention you or anyone else's name, so it is in fact you that is baiting/flaming/whatever you'd like to call it. He is stating his opinion on FW, which he has every right to do, and the fact that he posted after you is does not imply it was directed at you. The second half of your post is fine, you can cry "passive aggressive" bullshit arguements all you'd like, as it is just as rightfully an opinion as was Fitz's. But you really need to get over looking for a fight with Fitz, and realize that being one of the most active posters here, there arent a whole lotta places he isnt going to post. You arent victimized, youre victimizing yourself. Let's pull on our big-boy trousers and grow up a bit...
And its people like this why flame wars would be such a joke today. When players like ron or DM got a ban for something they said, they didnt come back and cry about their mistreatment; they acted as if nothing happened and continued to entertain the public without crossing the same boundry. FW was here for shock and entertainment value, as very rarely were the flames actually directed for someone's gameplay, which is why i understand why it was taken off the site.
Yes! Just like Big Whiskey, you come running to aid your Clan buddy AA. viewtopic.php?f=239&t=116012
Very sweet indeed. Yep, we have Big Whiskey and now YOU to continue the harrassment and baiting that AA Fitz has started.
It's so nice we have posters like yourself playing the role of the Morality Police.
What would we do with-out the Thought Police?
No FLAMES here,
GS
Woodruff wrote:a whiny git.
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Gold Knight wrote:Sorry, didnt mean to off-topic this. I already posted my "flamers" of my preference, BK Barunt also had his moments, though it was often bashing the newcomers such as the infamous Honibaz, but still worthy of some recognition. He had some good ones with Saul(maybe that was his name? Only remember his avatar...) who was also the holder of some one-hit wonder flames back in the day.
trapyoung wrote:Gold Knight wrote:Sorry, didnt mean to off-topic this. I already posted my "flamers" of my preference, BK Barunt also had his moments, though it was often bashing the newcomers such as the infamous Honibaz, but still worthy of some recognition. He had some good ones with Saul(maybe that was his name? Only remember his avatar...) who was also the holder of some one-hit wonder flames back in the day.
I couldn't care less if it was off-topic, but I just cringe at the forum friendly faux-flames; sling some real barbs
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Gold Knight wrote: im a pretty positive person most of the time.
chaosfactor wrote:Gold Knight wrote: im a pretty positive person most of the time.
You would not have lasted long, it was a cut throat environment populated by dirty rotten scoundrels. We all fed off of the left over diseased blood that the idiot savant 14 year olds left crumbling in their dried=up ruined royal virginal arse creaks.
Life was easy in those days, our air traffic controller was called wicked, and if any shot down planes came into the radar, she sent them our way..
In those day's Moderator's lazed around in circle jerks complementing each others nail varnish, and at the first sign of anarchy they moved the thread onto us..
The Flame division..
We were Darwinian, the process was the survival of the fittest.
In our hung little parliament with the mods, we together achieved an unstable peace process for almost over a year...
chaosfactor wrote:Gold Knight wrote: im a pretty positive person most of the time.
You would not have lasted long, it was a cut throat environment populated by dirty rotten scoundrels. We all fed off of the left over diseased blood that the idiot savant 14 year olds left crumbling in their dried=up ruined royal virginal arse creaks.
Life was easy in those days, our air traffic controller was called wicked, and if any shot down planes came into the radar, she sent them our way..
In those day's Moderator's lazed around in circle jerks complementing each others nail varnish, and at the first sign of anarchy they moved the thread onto us.. The Flame division..
We were Darwinian, the process was the survival of the fittest. In our hung little parliament with the mods, we together achieved an unstable peace process for almost over a year...
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
AAFitz wrote:I did forget to mention one other form of flamer. There were also some, maybe many in the day that would actually foe people when they disagreed with a forum post, or if they were made to look foolish, which happened a lot, and then foe them, and then unfoe them, and then foe them again, and then unfoe in a rather silly cycle of futility. They were more or less about the same as the ones that blamed everyone else for in equity and everyone else for their failures, but took it a step further by running away at the first site of being bested. It was quite funny to see really back in the day.
Like many, I actually miss the flame wars at times, except for the vast improvement their removal has meant to the site.
Gold Knight wrote:To be honest, thats how it always seemed to me. There really was never any "new blood" into FW unless they had direct approval from one of the long-time flamers. Anyone who actually used the forum to trash opponents was belittled on a rediculous basis, and it seemed that most of the threads circulated on the repetitive bashing of those who had made a fool of themselves in the previous threads. FW was alot of searching to find that one comment that would actually make you laugh out loud or cringe, but for the most part was a string of vulgarities and penis jokes... which do sometimes have their place. =D
chaosfactor wrote:Fitz, you never made the scene in FW, bluster away with your version of the events.
This is your home ground, here in GD. It is nice to touch base with your tainted perception of the deeds of a yesteryear elsewhere, semi-nostalgic, but generally untrue.
You are definitely the oldest swinger in town
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users