La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by MeDeFe »

Please, remove that picture of the person with the photographer, it contains personal information.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

MeDeFe wrote:Please, remove that picture of the person with the photographer, it contains personal information.



EDITED

It has been changed to a pic of the same man wearing dark shades... 8-)
And Bedub1's name has been removed to comply with the rules... :mrgreen:
Image
User avatar
Iccinot Nabrus
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:42 pm
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Iccinot Nabrus »

That is one amazing camera. . . did you see the zoom on that baby? That thing can almost see through clothes. I want that!

























With the matching hat.
Image
bedub1
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by bedub1 »

Robinette wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:Please, remove that picture of the person with the photographer, it contains personal information.



EDITED

It has been changed to a pic of the same man wearing dark shades... 8-)
And Bedub1's name has been removed to comply with the rules... :mrgreen:

Who knows who the photographer is...and who knows who took the picture....but they are definitely real and the house has been owned by a turtle...
User avatar
EagleofGreenErth
Posts: 1055
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:41 pm
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by EagleofGreenErth »

Robinette wrote:
That is AWESOME!!!

Well done to whoever that paparazzi is behind those dark shades that took that pic of ***BLEEPED***...

Image


Please edit your post. Sharing of personal info is NOT allowed here on CC. >_>
User avatar
Simon Viavant
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:17 pm
Location: Alaska

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Simon Viavant »

Over-reaction much guys?
(Although if DM had posted this, he'd be perma-banned right now)
ImageImageImage
Remember Them
User avatar
xelabale
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:12 am

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by xelabale »

Hey if we can't overreact what's the point?
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Neoteny »

3 pages is hardly an overreaction.

Remember that business with *PH and Tw*ll? Seems similar to me, though I'll go ahead and say that I don't know the veracity of the original bit of information.

Also, I demand that, for my privacy, when anyone refers to me by name, all the vowels be replaced with asterisks. That way, when someone says "N**t*n* lives at this address and leaves for work every day at precisely 7:42," I know that my protection is guaranteed.

Additionally, how sweet would it be to have the Ferris Bueller house?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by MeDeFe »

I remember it, it was pretty epic. And quite stupidly handled by Tw*ll, I mean, he had put up the private information HIMSELF, all the other party did was link to it/point out how to find it, and it turned out to be a no-brainer.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Batmanette
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 1:45 am

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Batmanette »

I know Robinette very well, that is how i heard about this thread.

She's messing with you guys, there are several things wrong here.
So let me set the record straight.

1st. This house was NOT designed by van der Rohe like the title says
2nd. That was NOT a real Ferrari in the movie.
3rd. It was not Bueller's house, it was Frye's house.

One thing is for sure, The new owner will be needing a staff of volunteers to keep the windows clean. :D
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by john9blue »

Batmanette wrote:I know Robinette very well, that is how i heard about this thread.

She's messing with you guys, there are several things wrong here.
So let me set the record straight.

1st. This house was NOT designed by van der Rohe like the title says
2nd. That was NOT a real Ferrari in the movie.
3rd. It was not Bueller's house, it was Frye's house.

One thing is for sure, The new owner will be needing a staff of volunteers to keep the windows clean. :D


Wow, looks like you're right. Hopefully you can stick around and debunk more of Robinette's crazy theories. :lol:

But is this really going to be L@ck's house? :?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

john9blue wrote:
Batmanette wrote:I know Robinette very well, that is how i heard about this thread.

She's messing with you guys, there are several things wrong here.
So let me set the record straight.

1st. This house was NOT designed by van der Rohe like the title says
2nd. That was NOT a real Ferrari in the movie.
3rd. It was not Bueller's house, it was Frye's house.

One thing is for sure, The new owner will be needing a staff of volunteers to keep the windows clean. :D


Wow, looks like you're right. Hopefully you can stick around and debunk more of Robinette's crazy theories. :lol:

But is this really going to be L@ck's house? :?


HEY... wait a minute...

2 out of those 3 things were clearly disclosed in my original post...


Robinette wrote:................
Well that house, the house of Cameron Frye's father, was designed by our very own van der Rohe...
well, technically it was designed by 2 of his students, but hey!........................




And now i need to do something to punish Batman for that post...
Image
Image
User avatar
Sackett58
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:36 pm
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Sackett58 »

Robinette wrote:And now i need to do something to punish Batman for that post...
Image


Looks like Brokeback Batcave to me :?
Image
2010-04-24 18:51:35 - MrMoody: OMG I'm in a game with stunna, what is up with this?
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

Sackett58 wrote:
Looks like Brokeback Batcave to me :?


Image
User avatar
Sackett58
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:36 pm
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Sackett58 »

Robinette wrote:
Sackett58 wrote:
Looks like Brokeback Batcave to me :?


Image



Maybe Batman needs an upgrade
Image
Image
2010-04-24 18:51:35 - MrMoody: OMG I'm in a game with stunna, what is up with this?
User avatar
azezzo
Posts: 971
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:54 pm
Gender: Male
Location: New York state, by way of Chicago

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by azezzo »

Image
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

Well it's official...
somebody is about to be the proud new owner of the home made famous by the movie "'Ferris Bueller's Day Off'.

Unfortunately, I am not allowed to say WHO this person is...
*that would be sharing private information, which is a no-no*
But it is public knowledge that the mailing address is:

370 N Beech St
Highland Park, Illinois, USA


So get out your "Best wishes on your new home" greeting cards...
But don't send them yet...
There is to be a 4 month escrow, so no move in till November.
I'm sure this has to do with packing, moving, maybe even some painting, etc..

I for one, will be sending this new owner an early Christmas Card...
I'm sure it will be appreciated, and you can do the same...
providing you don't violate the privacy policy

And if I might make a suggestion to one hard shelled compadre,
*you know who you are* *wink* *wink*
this would make an excellent Christmas Card...

Image
Image
User avatar
targetman377
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by targetman377 »

this thread has made me laugh :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: cry :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: get angry :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: thanks guys for making a great thread =D> =D> =D> =D>
VOTE AUTO/TARGET in 12
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Dancing Mustard »

Lolz........ lolz..... titter.... here's this thread in it's purest form:

Image

Ha ha! In pictures!... lolz... now all the sex-starved dweebs can sniff my cyber-pants and tell me that was funny, because they hope that will make a girl like them. lolz .... titter ....







Now, if you'll kindly excuse me, I can feel a bout of narcolepsy coming on. Personally, I blame this utterly flaccid and worthless thread.


Image

lolz titter.... said a thing, then posted a pic ... that's always funny .... right? ..... titter .... lolz .... isn't it?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

MLS ID# 07218797 has been sold...

The MLS now states: "Estate Sale Sold -No disclosures!"

lol... well what-ya-know... whoever it is that bought this house, very much values their privacy...
lol... no surprise there... *wink, wink*...

My source tells me the house sold for "about half" the asking price...
What a great time to be buying a house in Highland Park!
Way to go La--, um.... i mean... way to go, mystery shopper!!!
You deserve it!

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by john9blue »

"Mystery Shopper" sure has a lot of money...

I wonder what the going rate is these days for good moderators? :-s
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

Robinette wrote:
lol... well what-ya-know... whoever it is that bought this house, very much values their privacy...
lol... no surprise there... *wink, wink*...

My source tells me the house sold for "about half" the asking price...
What a great time to be buying a house in Highland Park!
Way to go La--, um.... i mean... way to go, mystery shopper!!!
You deserve it!

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image



I have an update on what you-know-who paid for this house...
http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/370-Beech-Street_Highland-Park_IL_60035_1109385563

It still states "Estate Sale Sold -No disclosures!",
but the purchase amount had to be filed with the county for property tax assessments....
Aaaaaaannnnd here it is:

370 Beech Street Highland Park, IL 60035
$1,800,000
4 Bed, 4 Bath | 5,300 Sq Ft on 0.75 Acres (32,670 Sq Ft Lot) |
MLS #07218797

Smart move is you ask me....
This is a one-of-a-kind home, bought at the low water mark for housing prices...
With a lot of upside potential...

Well done =D> oh great Green one... =D>

Image


Here's a good news clip from last year, before it sold..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRBgoIIhfJM


and then there is this... i really like this extra info in this one...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY6-Z4ZNA54
Image
User avatar
Sackett58
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:36 pm
Gender: Male

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Sackett58 »

I don't see the kitchen. That would be a selling point for me. :D
Image
2010-04-24 18:51:35 - MrMoody: OMG I'm in a game with stunna, what is up with this?
User avatar
KoolBak
Posts: 7414
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
Gender: Male
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by KoolBak »

Going rate for good moderators.....Prime cut $3.99 / lb; tailings $1.99 / lb

I am really surprised the bossman is moving to Illernoise.....does they gots Poutine and Kokanee there? :shock:

Maybe it be a vaca home........

Image
Image
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."

Neil Young....Like An Inca

AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
User avatar
Robinette
Posts: 2944
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Northern California

Re: La*k's new house to be a van der Rohe

Post by Robinette »

Sackett58 wrote:I don't see the kitchen. That would be a selling point for me. :D


Image
There's the kitchen...



Also... i have a correction...
This house did NOT sell for 1.8 mill...
The original listed price was 2.2 million,
and it was REDUCED to 1.8....

BUT

The actual sale amount was not disclosed...
And my inside source, who can't... or Won't... tell me,
did say it sold for about HALF the asking price...
So about a million? give or take?
This would've fetched 3 million a few years ago!
It came with all the furniture too...
but not the cars, lol...

Does anybody live in this county?
One trip to the county records office would confirm the sale amount...
But i suppose we don't REALLY need to know...
It's enough for me to know that it was a REALLY REALLY good deal...
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”