Moderator: Community Team
I was saying that Kennedy's affair with Monroe (and many others) was not disputed, I'm not hear to defend bahd speling.Captain_Scarlet wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Seriously, this is not disputed. Really.JJM wrote:I spelt every word in that post right and I don't know who is telling you that nonesense.
You just spelt two words wrong.jonesthecurl wrote:I was saying that Kennedy's affair with Monroe (and many others) was not disputed, I'm not hear to defend bahd speling.Captain_Scarlet wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Seriously, this is not disputed. Really.JJM wrote:I spelt every word in that post right and I don't know who is telling you that nonesense.

No. Every president has made a few bad decissions but if Kennedy did cheat then that is something to be ashamed of however I do not believe that he did such a thing.Captain_Scarlet wrote:Jimbo by your standards everyone fails as no one is perfect
That's great JJM, except you CHOSE the word CHOOSE poorly.JJM wrote:I am still wondering who choose Hickory. ( I found out how to spell check yay!!!!!!!!!!! )
?thegreekdog wrote:That's great JJM, except you CHOSE the word CHOOSE poorly.JJM wrote:I am still wondering who choose Hickory. ( I found out how to spell check yay!!!!!!!!!!! )
The phrase "I am still wondering who CHOOSE Hickory" is incorrect. What you meant to say was "I am still wondering who CHOSE Hickory" which is correct. So, while spell check is great, it does not check for grammar. Therefore, you spelled the word "choose" correctly, but failed to account for the proper use of the word in the sentence. Hope that helps.JJM wrote:?thegreekdog wrote:That's great JJM, except you CHOSE the word CHOOSE poorly.JJM wrote:I am still wondering who choose Hickory. ( I found out how to spell check yay!!!!!!!!!!! )
opps.thegreekdog wrote:The phrase "I am still wondering who CHOOSE Hickory" is incorrect. What you meant to say was "I am still wondering who CHOSE Hickory" which is correct. So, while spell check is great, it does not check for grammar. Therefore, you spelled the word "choose" correctly, but failed to account for the proper use of the word in the sentence. Hope that helps.JJM wrote:?thegreekdog wrote:That's great JJM, except you CHOSE the word CHOOSE poorly.JJM wrote:I am still wondering who choose Hickory. ( I found out how to spell check yay!!!!!!!!!!! )
oopsJJM wrote:opps.thegreekdog wrote:The phrase "I am still wondering who CHOOSE Hickory" is incorrect. What you meant to say was "I am still wondering who CHOSE Hickory" which is correct. So, while spell check is great, it does not check for grammar. Therefore, you spelled the word "choose" correctly, but failed to account for the proper use of the word in the sentence. Hope that helps.JJM wrote:?thegreekdog wrote:That's great JJM, except you CHOSE the word CHOOSE poorly.JJM wrote:I am still wondering who choose Hickory. ( I found out how to spell check yay!!!!!!!!!!! )

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
A perfect example of people makeing a big deal over presidential firsts. Obama the first black, Kennedy the first Catholic. They made a big deal over H. clinton almost being the first women president and Romney almost being the first Mormon why does any of that matter.pimpdave wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
I think JJM is referring to them being considered great presidents becauase they were the firsts in history. I sort of agree in that I don't understand why President Kennedy is included in the discussion of greatest presidents apart from his incredible charisma and that he was Catholic (which seems more of a hindrance to being considered great in much of this country).Neoteny wrote:None of those things have (had) happened in over two hundred years of history. It shows that we've made a lot of progress as a country. That's reason to celebrate, I think. Just the same as it was reason to celebrate the first man on the moon, the first working vaccine, etc.
Why celebrate a crook becoming president.Neoteny wrote:None of those things have (had) happened in over two hundred years of history. It shows that we've made a lot of progress as a country. That's reason to celebrate, I think. Just the same as it was reason to celebrate the first man on the moon, the first working vaccine, etc.
JJM wrote:Why celebrate a crook becoming president.Neoteny wrote:None of those things have (had) happened in over two hundred years of history. It shows that we've made a lot of progress as a country. That's reason to celebrate, I think. Just the same as it was reason to celebrate the first man on the moon, the first working vaccine, etc.

Slightly more limited in that they also had to own land. Though I can't really say Washington was the cause of this, as he was either busy fighting the Brits, or busy figuring out what the hell a President is supposed to do.JJM wrote:I have heard that when this country was founded that the only people allowed to vote were White Male Protestants. Washington must of had many prejudices if he wanted things to be that although I could be wrong maybe it was only congress that thought that way and Washington was not able to git legislation to change that past them. I was wondering if any of you know more about that.
Obama.neanderpaul14 wrote:JJM wrote:Why celebrate a crook becoming president.Neoteny wrote:None of those things have (had) happened in over two hundred years of history. It shows that we've made a lot of progress as a country. That's reason to celebrate, I think. Just the same as it was reason to celebrate the first man on the moon, the first working vaccine, etc.
Which one are you talking about?? The crook who became president is being awful vague.
It does seem odd.muy_thaiguy wrote:Slightly more limited in that they also had to own land. Though I can't really say Washington was the cause of this, as he was either busy fighting the Brits, or busy figuring out what the hell a President is supposed to do.JJM wrote:I have heard that when this country was founded that the only people allowed to vote were White Male Protestants. Washington must of had many prejudices if he wanted things to be that although I could be wrong maybe it was only congress that thought that way and Washington was not able to git legislation to change that past them. I was wondering if any of you know more about that.