I'm in.

Accused:

jono is a pedfuk

The accused are suspected of:

Other: offensive name

Game number(s):

12897709

and others

Comments:

Self-explanatory. I find the name offensive, and I believe it goes against the rules.

I waited for him to deadbeat out of my game so I wouldn't be accused of ...

I am Not a Cheater! Nor is My Father!! We're paying Customers just like everyone else. Soo my Dad made a mistake and choose the Wrong Handle... We've Never Cheated and Never been Cheaters!! We Bleed Integrity!! Duty!! Responsibility!! Honor!! Courage!! You're a just a Bad SPORT!! Can't believe you ...

Omg, talk about an over-reaction.
a) I didn't report anyone for cheating. I pointed out that the names were similar, added that the play at that point seemed fair, and suggested such similar names probably needed looking into. I even acknowledged the possibility of a relationship. Read it - it's ...

In my game, one was in africa, with all his troops attacking me north and east. Meanwhile, he left 1 on Dakar, leaving africa undefended against the other one in sao paulo. 1 vs 1 and neither attacked the other. Now *that* is sus - stinks of SD.

How so?

Accused:

Smythwick
Smythwick2

The accused are suspected of:

Possibly Being Multis

Game number(s):

12782703

Comments:
I could be totally wrong. I mean, they attack each other. But surely these player names cry out to be looked at more closely ...
They've played a few games together, but ...

No.

Cheeseballs ...

The word "blatant" is just an adjective meaning clear and obvious. So it's not much worse than just calling you a normal liar really.

If that's tactics, then it's very poor tactics. Green has nothing to lose. With 100+ in Dubai and only 1 defender in Cairo why wouldn't he take it and kill blue's bonus? I agree, with the spoils in the 100's, what's the value in a 3 troop bonus. But by the same token, why not take it?

Accused:

mubarek
solarsam

The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

12267677

Comments:
For most of the game, certainly for the last four or five rounds, these two payers have not attacked one another, and only attacked me. In addition, I find that solarsam ...

I don't know how so many people could reply to this thread. I could hardly even understand the original post.

Hello,

Thank you for all the replies.

I did not know there was a distinction between a truce and a treaty. So i checked the log. The two players agreed to a "truce" . I need to educate myself on the difference between a treaty and truce as it applies in this game. This forum topic is as much ...

Also, if you're talking about a "treaty", then the terms of such an alliance would probably indeed include equality of bonuses. But if it was in fact a "truce" then I'd say the request falls outside of that definition. Still, it's a matter for the players to work out amongst themselves and is not ...

Great reply. Truces are a normal, legal and valuable part of the strategy, as is breaking a truce.

The player throwing the game is clearly an idiot.

No, it's not cheating. Just part of the game. And I don't consider it poor sportsmanship either. In fact, I kinda get tired of people saying it's either.

Frankly, I've seen people use that strategy when no such build up of troops exist - so other players can be just as easily fooled when the ...

Wow! That was unexpected! I guess this one was just looking for trouble!

Whether or not I was syntactically correct referring to them as a deadbeat is almost irrelevant, given the severity of the language in the pm they sent - one MONTH after the event, and after their last pm. Clearly the just can't let go. Would have been good if toeing them had avoided this problem.

I've reported the most recent pm using the triangle.

>

Accused:

emily77

The accused are suspected of:

PM Abuse


After they deadbeated in a game, I gave the above an appropriate rating. They followed that with an abusive pm. So I foed them and forgot about it. Now, some time later, I get another abusive pm from them. I didn't think they were ...

Thanks for that excellent summary, Dibbun. I'd certainly support all your comments there. I just received an abusive PM from someone who didn't like my rating. Foe and move on is now my motto.

Evil Semp wrote:Lt. Col. Cook ll is CLEARED of being a multi.

Thank guys. Sorry for taking your time.

[quote="jefjef"]2010-03-09 02:50:20 - [color=#0000BF]Lt. Col. Cook ll[/color]: sure doesnt feel like it. Why are there (?) marks on some land areas
2010-03-09 08:15:48 - [color=#FF0000]delahoc[/color]: because this is fog of war - you can't see those territories[/quote]

Yes, after my earlier ...

Accused:

Lt. Col. Cook ll

The accused are suspected of:

Curious comment suggests a Multi

Game number(s):

6590398

Comments:
This was a really curious first comment from a supposed newbie on only his second game ....
2010-03-09 05:30:25 - Lt. Col. Cook ll: this is BS....I cant win one damn ...

Fuzzylogic99 wrote:Wht do you think...should I file a report on them

Er, you just did!!!