Page 1 of 1
Conquer Rome vicarious bug
Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 8:30 am
by ImNev
Hi,
My opponent captured the tessalonici vicarious and received 3 (or so) armies for holding 2 regions.
Then I took over, made sure he only had MII, but nevertheless, he kept on receiving armies in the vicarious, while holding only 1 region.
He did not place armies in the vicarious, I made sure.
Has anyone noticed this?
Regards.
Imnev
Re: Conquer Rome vicarious bug
Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 8:49 am
by ImNev
#22444436
Re: Conquer Rome vicarious bug
Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 8:54 am
by ImNev
Nvm, I am confused
I was confusing the manual deployment bonus with the army that the seat automatcially gets
I Apologize deeply
Re: Conquer Rome vicarious bug
Posted: Mon May 01, 2023 10:41 am
by Extreme Ways
ImNev wrote:Hi,
My opponent captured the tessalonici vicarious and received 3 (or so) armies for holding 2 regions.
Then I took over, made sure he only had MII, but nevertheless, he kept on receiving armies in the vicarious, while holding only 1 region.
He did not place armies in the vicarious, I made sure.
Has anyone noticed this?
Regards.
Imnev
In the "bottom left", you see that vicarious seats get +1 autodeploy.
Re: Conquer Rome vicarious bug
Posted: Sun May 07, 2023 1:14 pm
by SoN!c
ImNev wrote:Hi,
My opponent captured the tessalonici vicarious and received 3 (or so) armies for holding 2 regions.
Then I took over, made sure he only had MII, but nevertheless, he kept on receiving armies in the vicarious, while holding only 1 region.
He did not place armies in the vicarious, I made sure.
Has anyone noticed this?
Regards.
Imnev
You took Thess, not thess vicarious
log says it: " ImNev assaulted
Thessalonica from MV and conquered it from jphoc"
So "Then I took over" is not true at all, because you needed to take over Thessaloniki Vicarious, log says you never did that. jphoc assaulted
Thessalonica Vicarious from Thessalonica and conquered it from neutral player
"Thessalonica" and "Thessalonica Vicarious" are not the same terrs