Conquer Rome vicarious bug

[ImNev]

Hi,

My opponent captured the tessalonici vicarious and received 3 (or so) armies for holding 2 regions.
Then I took over, made sure he only had MII, but nevertheless, he kept on receiving armies in the vicarious, while holding only 1 region.

He did not place armies in the vicarious, I made sure.

Has anyone noticed this?

Regards.
Imnev

[ImNev]

#22444436

[ImNev]

Nvm, I am confused

I was confusing the manual deployment bonus with the army that the seat automatcially gets

I Apologize deeply

[Extreme Ways]

Hi,

My opponent captured the tessalonici vicarious and received 3 (or so) armies for holding 2 regions.
Then I took over, made sure he only had MII, but nevertheless, he kept on receiving armies in the vicarious, while holding only 1 region.

He did not place armies in the vicarious, I made sure.

Has anyone noticed this?

Regards.
Imnev

In the "bottom left", you see that vicarious seats get +1 autodeploy.

[SoN!c]

Hi,

My opponent captured the tessalonici vicarious and received 3 (or so) armies for holding 2 regions.
Then I took over, made sure he only had MII, but nevertheless, he kept on receiving armies in the vicarious, while holding only 1 region.

He did not place armies in the vicarious, I made sure.

Has anyone noticed this?

Regards.
Imnev

You took Thess, not thess vicarious

log says it: " ImNev assaulted Thessalonica from MV and conquered it from jphoc"

So "Then I took over" is not true at all, because you needed to take over Thessaloniki Vicarious, log says you never did that. jphoc assaulted Thessalonica Vicarious from Thessalonica and conquered it from neutral player

"Thessalonica" and "Thessalonica Vicarious" are not the same terrs