Conquer Club

I like alot
go with it and don't look back

I still like at least 4 stashes, but 3 seems to be the popular vote

Stamp it! Stamp it! Stamp it! Stamp it!

a.sub wrote:i made all the edits including spelling
if we can all agree ill update the pic on the first post
[bigimg]http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/CCbank218-18.png[/bigimg]

Too bad you didn't decide to change the gameplay as I would've liked. But at least you made it easier to win as a thief! 3 stashes are possible to hold even when the game is quite close.

By the way who's making this map? Izrman obviously created the thread but it seems like a.sub is in control here !

its lzrman's map
i do the graphics hes doing XML and the gameplay since i know little to nothing about them

Hopscotcher wrote:I still like at least 4 stashes

Gillipig wrote:May I suggest holding 4 stashes along with the get away car in order to win...

Hopscotcher wrote:I still like Stashes at 2.

That way you can't steam roll them, especially in the vault.

i also prefer 4 stashes plus getaway car to win because the vault alone has 3 stashes, all with a single neutral. to secure an objective win, a requirement for 4 stashes forces a player to break the vault as well as hold any stash elsewhere. it's also easier to code because there are fewer combinations - a minor point.

3 stashes plus getaway car is probably still playable, giving a much easier objective win.

iancanton wrote:

a.sub wrote:

natty_dread wrote:why is that one alarm named "Major Major Major Major"? seems a bit repeatative to me...

catch 22?

please change the name to avoid copyright issues. inspector inspector inspector (or something similar) doesn't seem to have the same ring to it though.

natty_dread wrote:Would copyright infringment be avoided if it was called just "Major Major"?

major major is probably fine. major major major major is not.

a.sub wrote:spell sheriff and getaway properly

getaway's been done. sheriff still isn't quite there!

ian.

Done, and yeah i thought i changed sheriff, but apparently not lol my bad
anything else, specifically anything else gameplay related?
[bigimg]http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/CCbank218-19.png[/bigimg]

No matter which way you go into the vault, you only have to get past 1 Alarm to hold 3 stashes. If win condition is 3 stashes, is this fair?

I'm all for sending off the map, but I think 4 stashes minimum.

I'll agree w/ Hopscotcher and Iancanton on this one, 4 stashes for consenus b/c if you get vault you get stashes .. if it doesn't work then we can always change it in BETA.

poll?

when in doubt, hold a vote

this slipped through the net: substitute detective avi for private avi.

iancanton wrote:incidentally, why is avi a private? shouldn't he be a detective or something? it's not a military bank.

there's a dot in the middle of sir. fred that shouldn't be there.

[player]a.sub[/player], can u number ur versions, so that we can refer to them more easily?

[player]lzrman[/player], can u amend the topic title to show the latest update (which is not on page 25 any more)? u will also need to set up a poll (preferably one that runs for a week or less), unless u already know the exact objective that u want for the map.

ian.

my apologies, idk what version this is, so lets just call it 20
VERSION 20
[bigimg]http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/CCbank218-20.png[/bigimg]

A.SUB... you still haven't fixed sheriffyou are spelling it with two r's .... other that that doing good.

wait but it was fixed a few version ago?!?!?
GAHHHHHHHH
VERSION 21
[bigimg]http://i333.photobucket.com/albums/m390/asub3293/CCbank218-21.png[/bigimg]

what's ur opinion, [player]lzrman[/player]?

ian.

Looking great. Where are the stamps?

I agree, this should be stamped already. There's nothing but nitpicks left, if there are any strategic flaws the beta period will see to them.

i also agree!
but im kinda biased lol

How about making the territory "Charlie" into a thug or even a stash.
Just thought I'd suggest that since its sitting kinda out of the way with no real reason anyone would conquer it.
Theres also Joey, Mo, & Brian just leading to a dead end.

But sweet map.

natty_dread wrote:I agree, this should be stamped already. There's nothing but nitpicks left, if there are any strategic flaws the beta period will see to them.

STAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

STAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hopscotcher wrote:

natty_dread wrote:I agree, this should be stamped already. There's nothing but nitpicks left, if there are any strategic flaws the beta period will see to them.

STAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

STAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think that we all agree that it should be stamped ... wheres the people you need when you need them

we'll stamp it for gameplay after [player]lzrman[/player] tells us which version we're meant to be stamping. in the meantime, since the graphics workshop is the correct place for this map now, onward it goes!

ian.

iancanton wrote:we'll stamp it for gameplay after [player]lzrman[/player] tells us which version we're meant to be stamping. in the meantime, since the graphics workshop is the correct place for this map now, onward it goes!

ian.

the "correct version" is on the front page, its constantly updated because i delete the old picture and upload a new one with the same name to photobucket so he doesnt have to change the links

EDIT: god damn where are my manners.
And thank you for moving this to the graphics department, as usual the hard work the carto staff and community has worked to push this map forward

As A.Sub has stated the one on the main post which is consistantly a a static of our most up to date map

Sorry guys was on vacation volunteering =P I am back.

welcome back, [player]lzrman[/player]! for the benefit of those new to the thread, while u were away, we discussed changing the objective to holding any 3 stashes for the win, with the stashes inside the vault being single neutrals and the stashes outside being neutral-2s.

a.sub wrote:the goal shouldnt be too hard to get, so maybe another vote is needed? what will be

A) enough to prevent an easy win
B) easy enough to prevent it from being impossible
C) made so that no position has a major advantage.

i personally say 3 so they can either go for the vault or the ones out of the vault, since trying a bit of both would be stupid
any other opinions?

iancanton wrote:

Hopscotcher wrote:I still like at least 4 stashes

Gillipig wrote:May I suggest holding 4 stashes along with the get away car in order to win...

Hopscotcher wrote:I still like Stashes at 2.

That way you can't steam roll them, especially in the vault.

i also prefer 4 stashes plus getaway car to win because the vault alone has 3 stashes, all with a single neutral. to secure an objective win, a requirement for 4 stashes forces a player to break the vault as well as hold any stash elsewhere. it's also easier to code because there are fewer combinations - a minor point.

3 stashes plus getaway car is probably still playable, giving a much easier objective win.

since u like the latest image, i'm happy to issue an appropriate stamp for the map that has a 3-stash objective.



ian.