Page 3 of 13
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:20 pm
by Unit_2
Are you going to change the bonus that it is worth to the right amount?
i.e. Asia, Africa, Norht America, Etc.
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:33 pm
by hecter
Unit_2 wrote:Are you going to change the bonus that it is worth to the right amount?
i.e. Asia, Africa, Norht America, Etc.
They are the right amount...
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:03 am
by Coleman
wicked wrote:The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.
Agree Fully.
wicked wrote:Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.
uhh... Agree on the small map, think the large map is fine.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:05 am
by Coleman
People, this is all the artist is allowed to do:
army circles
territory names
legends
border adjusting
and he/she can only adjust these in a visual way. We can not make any gameplay changes, we can't make any ascetic image changes. We can not make any major color changes.
So please, just focus on commenting on those 4, most of you are understanding this, but not everyone.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:11 am
by MrBenn
I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
by yeti_c
wicked wrote:The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.
Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.
I agree with Wicked... (Not sure that's happened before
)
C.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:21 am
by wicked
yeti_c wrote:wicked wrote:The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.
Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.
I agree with Wicked... (Not sure that's happened before
)
C.
yes it's only blurry on the small map, but that's what over 90% of people use.
Also if the orange of Aussie can be tweaked ever so slightly, it'll make it stand out more from Asia. I'm pretty sure Lack would be ok with that minor color change.
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:03 pm
by tenio
90% of the people use the small map? wow I can barley read the small map
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:06 pm
by gimil
MrBenn wrote:I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...
Again not possible under lacks veto.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:05 am
by lackattack
gimil wrote:MrBenn wrote:I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...
Again not possible under lacks veto.
The touchup author can try increasing the contrast IF it can be done easily.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:31 am
by gimil
lackattack wrote:gimil wrote:MrBenn wrote:I still think that there needs to be a slightly bigger contrast between Asia/Oceania... the red and the reddy-orange seem to merge a bit...
Again not possible under lacks veto.
The touchup author can try increasing the contrast IF it can be done easily.
The man himself shows face
Ill be sure to let him know
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:22 am
by Skittles!
Ah, can you move S. Europe a little to the left so it's more visible to know that Middle East and S. Europe touch?
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:59 pm
by gimil
The quiet helper wrote:Fixes
-Orange Oceania
-Southern Europe white removed
-Southern Europe Border to Middle East attack line added
-Random numbers
-Fixed small version Oceania territory blur
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:10 pm
by Genghis Khan CA
As someone who never thought the original classic map was THAT bad... I'd like to congratulate the touch-upper on a job well done - it looks fantastic!
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:43 pm
by rebelman
rebelman wrote:the orange numbering is almost impossible to read in western oz
was this comment ignored ?
actually could we see numbers on continents the same colour, this was a big problem in classic before touch up it would be great if it could be looked at as well
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:20 am
by hecter
Again, I'd like to see the sea connections cleaned up a bit. They just look so blocky and jagged... Like stairs.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:37 am
by Lone.prophet
what did you do with the land colors, i really dont like them i think it is way oversaturned
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:21 am
by WidowMakers
The text in QUEBEC for the large map still needs fixing. (edbeard pointed that out)
Lone.prophet wrote:what did you do with the land colors, i really dont like them i think it is way oversaturned
They look virtually the same to me. I think the new map "looks" slightly brighter due to the army circles being lighter.
hecter wrote:Again, I'd like to see the sea connections cleaned up a bit. They just look so blocky and jagged... Like stairs.
They are the same between both maps. Does lack care? Connection lines were not on the list of fixes allowed. But I really don't see the harm in adding new blue lines.
EDIT: A new line between southern Europe and Middle east was added in the update. Makes sense to allow the other lines to get fixed as well. (Unless keeping them the same as the current map is OK)
WM
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:31 pm
by gimil
Lone.prophet wrote:what did you do with the land colors, i really dont like them i think it is way oversaturned
They are identical except for aus which has been made less saturated than before to increase the contrast between aus and asia.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:25 pm
by lackattack
Lone.prophet's comment reminds me of someone who complained about how the colour of Africa became aweful when we tried to launch this the fist time. Africa's colour wasn't changed at all of course.
I like the new Oz orange.
let's leave the attack lines as is.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:16 pm
by Lone.prophet
well i really did see difference now i dont see it anymore LOL
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:24 pm
by Kaplowitz
gimil wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!
Like i JUST said there protected under lacks veto
I dont care about lackattack- who does he think he is? some kind of all powerful administrator or something?!
oh right 
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:36 pm
by gimil
Kaplowitz wrote:gimil wrote:Kaplowitz wrote:I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!
Like i JUST said there protected under lacks veto
I dont care about lackattack- who does he think he is? some kind of all powerful administrator or something?!
oh right
Its alright, we all know twill is taking over
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:23 pm
by iancanton
i'm having trouble distinguishing 3s from 8s in the army count, especially in dark blue. this also applies on the existing classic map. usually, it's pretty obvious which one it is if u're in the middle of a game. however, if the numbers suddenly appear in a fog game, then it might catch out a few people.
ian.
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:05 am
by gimil
