Conquer Club

• I would like to be able to play 2 player team games, with one player taking control of all of a teams colours.

• Nothing more to add.

• I like to play one on one, but the current 2 player option is a total crap shoot. As long as both players have a reasonable grasp of strategy, it is a level playing field. Differences in skill matter little, with most games being decided by the drop, dice or cards.
• There is also a seesaw effect, where if one player gains a small advantage it quickly becomes an insurmountable lead. A good round of dice early in the game can easily decide a game.
• Team games simply have a greater skill factor than two player games.

ahunda wrote:*Bump*

Might there be some hope for this to see the light of day, now that we have new management ?

On a side-note: I´m not sure, this merging practice is so fortunate. I had started a suggestion for this too & put A LOT of work into it, including two polls, detailed summary of the debate (pros & cons) in the first post, clarifying questions such as 1v1 and 1vteam, etc.

This has now gone lost somewhere in the middle of those 20+ pages. Here it is: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 3#p2458643

1. We can have all relevant discussion in the same space. (good for mods and others who want to know complete history)
2. The management will not read through this whole thread to understand the idea. We will present the idea to them. It will largely be based on what you proposed and worked through.

chapcrap wrote:
Bottom line: your work is appreciated and is not going unnoticed.

greenoaks wrote:how would this with unlimited forts be any different to 1v1

trevor33 wrote:So what's the hold up with this?

chapcrap wrote:

trevor33 wrote:So what's the hold up with this?

Same as all other suggestions. The programmer chooses what to do with the time available and completes the task. The new leadership is still transitioning and hasn't started implementing suggestions, so things will take a while still. And I can tell you that this suggestion is not first priority for most.

betiko wrote:why not but this has been suggested many times before.
would it be ok to play 2/4 players vs that 1 man team?
would there be a special medal or would it be counted as dubs/trips/quads unique kills? I guess lots of configs would be acceptable such as 2vs2 quads?

• On the map there are 4 colors, and each player play with 2 colors.

• It will be the same rules that for double, but with only 2 players

• This mode will be for player who want to play 1v1 without this spupid neutral

greenoaks wrote:2 player team games

It would be fun and a different strategy if you had it so 1 player had 2 colors to control in a game.
Ex: Imagine a 4 player doubles game there is a red & green on the same team, instead player 1 has control of both sets of troop colors. Player 2 has both yellow and blue control. This calls for more think ahead strategy similar to team games but minus the possible deadbeats or clueless random teammates. We should give this a try if the programming can understand this new style of gameplay.

• 1 Player 2 Colors

• see above

• New strategy/gameplay similar to team games with less cooperation fails