Conquer Club

RjBeals wrote:

wicked wrote:Why do some circles have borders, and some don't? Can you make the circles a little darker?

No.. Not darker.

I think they all have borders, just some are easier to see than others.

i agree but to be honest i don't feel like squishing my eyes to see if all of them have borders.

RjBeals wrote:

wicked wrote:Why do some circles have borders, and some don't? Can you make the circles a little darker?

No.. Not darker.

I think they all have borders, just some are easier to see than others.

Yes a little darker. I'd like the see the difference. And no, not all have borders.

wicked wrote:

RjBeals wrote:

wicked wrote:Why do some circles have borders, and some don't? Can you make the circles a little darker?

No.. Not darker.

I think they all have borders, just some are easier to see than others.

Yes a little darker. I'd like the see the difference. And no, not all have borders.

Some could/should be more noticeable than they are now, but they're definitely all there.

If you say so. The fact not everyone can see them means they're not consistently visible. Are borders really necessary? what does it look like without?

No arguments there. Some of the circles do look a little messy. Specifically the edges.

on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

Same problem with Afghanistan.

hecter wrote:

wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

Same problem with Afghanistan.

lol AFCHANISTAN.

and CREAT BRITAIN.

probably just fixing all of the Gs is what is needed.

wcaclimbing wrote:

hecter wrote:

wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

Same problem with Afghanistan.

lol AFCHANISTAN.

and CREAT BRITAIN.

probably just fixing all of the Gs is what is needed.

Egypt and new guinea is by far worst. i swear it looks like new cuinea.

Looks the same to me

the orange numbering is almost impossible to read in western oz

wcaclimbing wrote:on the small map, it kinda looks like EGYPT is spelled ECYPT. The G looks a lot like a C.
(or am i just going insane because it is kinda late right now?)

anyway, could the G be made to look a bit more G-ish?

It looks like whatever font was used makes the G's look like C's when that small.

Maybe find the original font (whatever that was) or edit the text manually

pepperonibread wrote:No arguments there. Some of the circles do look a little messy. Specifically the edges.

I agree. There is already so much going on with the colors (especially in the small map with smaller circles. I say get rid of the colored outline.

DiM wrote:could we at least get a clarification as to what that shark/zeppelin/missile/jet/fish thing really is?

And as far as all of the talk about removing the missiles or whatever is in Canada, is that part of the project scope. I mean is lack allowing these aspects to be edited or just the text and army circles?

WM

WidowMakers wrote:

DiM wrote:could we at least get a clarification as to what that shark/zeppelin/missile/jet/fish thing really is?

And as far as all of the talk about removing the missiles or whatever is in Canada, is that part of the project scope. I mean is lack allowing these aspects to be edited or just the text and army circles?

WM

Lack has veto'ed any change on the origonal map, the only modifications allowed are:

-army circles
-Terr names
-Legends
-Movement of boarders if needed to fit names

I think that about covers it

I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!

Kaplowitz wrote:I agree w/ the "G" problem on the small map, and can we please take out the pictures?!

Like i JUST said there protected under lacks veto

The classic is better right now.

someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!

jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!

who said WM was doing this touch up?

gimil wrote:

jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!

who said WM was doing this touch up?

You! Get the zepplin thing out of Canada! And those damn missiles in Ukraine! And all the other stupid things you can find! Go, with haste!

hecter wrote:

gimil wrote:

jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!

who said WM was doing this touch up?

You! Get the zepplin thing out of Canada! And those damn missiles in Ukraine! And all the other stupid things you can find! Go, with haste!

Who says im doing it lol

gimil wrote:

hecter wrote:

gimil wrote:

jako wrote:someone better talk to lack and let WM get rid of that missle/catapillar/fish out of canada. if that thing is left alone to quench, it would be an insult to canadians everytime we played that map!

who said WM was doing this touch up?

You! Get the zepplin thing out of Canada! And those damn missiles in Ukraine! And all the other stupid things you can find! Go, with haste!

Who says im doing it lol

Did I say I cared who's doing this touchup? GO! DO EET!

gimil wrote:Lack has veto'ed any change on the origonal map, the only modifications allowed are:

-army circles
-Terr names
-Legends
-Movement of boarders if needed to fit names

I think that about covers it

Mmmmkay then. I guess the caterpillar stays.

• Removed army circle stroked edges
• Fixed the G/C issue on the small map
• Added new colours for armies

1. Is there something different about the text for QUEBEC on the large map? It looks like maybe it's the old version of the text or something? It might just be the background though.

2. Could you show us the large and small with random numbers instead of 88? I think it'll help determine if there's a readability issue since that's what this is mostly about.

The white circles in Europe make the country borders indistinguishable... it's just a big white blur in N.Eur, S.Eur area.

Also the shadow on the text in Aussie doesn't look clean, looks blurry.