If you think you have what it takes to battle on the seven seas with The Brethren of the Fat Mermaid, then send a message to [player]FrancisBoyle[/player], [player]Draq[/player], [player]GallantPellham[/player], or [player]BoganGod[/player].
Challenging any clan out there to a best of 40 games, where each clan makes the following 20 home games:
4 doubles 6 triples 10 quads
*No freestyle *No speed *Maps can only be played once per team setting *Random can be used as often as wished *No beta maps *No nuclear spoils *No unlimited forts on 1vs1 or dubs *No manual deployment
We are prepared to be flexible. Another option we would like to explore is limiting the amount of clan war games each clan member can be in. So clans use there entire roster rather than just using a few people in almost everything.
Last edited by DAAAAAAANG on Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:49 pm, edited 8 times in total.
30 is a bit low, i was hoping they change the rule to at least 40 minimum. Am I the only one besides scott-land and chariot of fire that sees that is is important to have a minimum of 40 games for a challenge to count? 20 and 30 is simply to small a sample in my opinion.
If you'll read a bit closer it says "best of 60 matchup". Where each clan makes 30 home games each. However, we are in the process of setting up a 50 game challenge right now.
I agree Blitz. A 40 minimum is far more indicative of performance/ability.
I think this challenge with the Mermaids is going to be a 60 gamer!
btw Francis...thanks for recent correspondence. gl with your travels (and on the tables in Vegas). The delay you requested is now going to impact on us (we're losing a few guys who are away later this month, plus we're without a few already coz of babies and such like) so for now I think we have to put the whole thing on ice.
Chariot of Fire wrote:I agree Blitz. A 40 minimum is far more indicative of performance/ability.
I think this challenge with the Mermaids is going to be a 60 gamer!
btw Francis...thanks for recent correspondence. gl with your travels (and on the tables in Vegas). The delay you requested is now going to impact on us (we're losing a few guys who are away later this month, plus we're without a few already coz of babies and such like) so for now I think we have to put the whole thing on ice.
yes francis, gl on the bluffin or whatever it takes, just win in vegas
Well folks, still in a close clan war with a fistful of 6's. Looking for our next victims! So who has the stones? EH? We are easy beats, have lost 2clan wars so far.... Hell we don't even have a general in our clan at present
BoganGod wrote:Well folks, still in a close clan war with a fistful of 6's. Looking for our next victims! So who has the stones? EH? We are easy beats, have lost 2clan wars so far.... Hell we don't even have a general in our clan at present
Maybe you will consider a new clan (FOED) with no generals or brigs so easy for you beat up on us.
BoganGod wrote:Well folks, still in a close clan war with a fistful of 6's. Looking for our next victims! So who has the stones? EH? We are easy beats, have lost 2clan wars so far.... Hell we don't even have a general in our clan at present
Maybe you will consider a new clan (FOED) with no generals or brigs so easy for you beat up on us.
Your earlier format would suit:
4dbs 11 trips 15quads
FOED has some good players and would be a challenge for sure. Some of em may need to take me off foe though.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Involved in 2clan wars at present. The next clan war will not be 60games. More than happy to consider something closer to the format we have up the top of the page
Due to the luck factor influencing formats shorter than 60 game challenges. Also the fact that many in FOED not prepared to lift jifjif from their foe list, we will look elsewhere.
brian fletcher wrote:Due to the luck factor influencing formats shorter than 60 game challenges. Also the fact that many in FOED not prepared to lift jifjif from their foe list, we will look elsewhere.
Good luck in your endeavours.
Every member of FOED will be 100% FOED until that obnoxious avatar comes down. I don't even see why you have such a problem with Bogan. You're even in another usergroup together. Honestly, I expected something a little more mature and friendly from your clan. I guess I was wrong.
brian fletcher wrote:Due to the luck factor influencing formats shorter than 60 game challenges. Also the fact that many in FOED not prepared to lift jifjif from their foe list, we will look elsewhere.
Good luck in your endeavours.
Many. As in 3. MN cheater. Innya loser. And hippie. Well I like him regardless of...
I can understand your wanting to protect your points though.
BTW. The avi that you and 3 others are sporting is a bait and a flame. You may want to remove it and put it somewhere more fitting.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
brian fletcher wrote:Due to the luck factor influencing formats shorter than 60 game challenges. Also the fact that many in FOED not prepared to lift jifjif from their foe list, we will look elsewhere.
Good luck in your endeavours.
Every member of FOED will be 100% FOED until that obnoxious avatar comes down. I don't even see why you have such a problem with Bogan. You're even in another usergroup together. Honestly, I expected something a little more mature and friendly from your clan. I guess I was wrong.
Toys - thrown - pram etc.
You realise our clan has absolutely nothing against Bogan? About 3 people put it up, who just happened to be part of the clan. The clan did not endorse the avatar, nor did the clan leaders have the avatar up.
FOED has absolutely nothing to do with baiting Bogan, just a few individuals. To foe the whole clan for something one or two members did as a joke is so childish. What, for example, did Jippd do against Bogan? Or Dan? Or L M S?
