Game no 1917216
Arturu is a liar. He gave me retalitory & non factual feedback about our game + abuse to me & others throughout. Pls could you look into this & let good over come evil. Thankyou
Retalitory & non factual feedback+ Abuse [ET]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
Great Pretender
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:29 am
- Contact:
With respect, that's rich coming from you Tarrus.
You put me on your ignore list after 2 games. When I pm'd you to ask, you sent back the reply I had killed you for no reason in a game. I then checked and this was incorrect. In fact, one game you had won. I sent you this information....no response, ever.
You put me on your ignore list after 2 games. When I pm'd you to ask, you sent back the reply I had killed you for no reason in a game. I then checked and this was incorrect. In fact, one game you had won. I sent you this information....no response, ever.
Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
-
SirSebstar
- Posts: 6969
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
- Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011
Fruitcake wrote:With respect, that's rich coming from you Tarrus.
You put me on your ignore list after 2 games. When I pm'd you to ask, you sent back the reply I had killed you for no reason in a game. I then checked and this was incorrect. In fact, one game you had won. I sent you this information....no response, ever.
then we both have headaches then dont we fruitcake lol.
However i have removed you from my ignore list as to be honest i cant remember the games we had although i do remember you mailing me. If i have offended you,i am sorry,but with respect,i didnt leave you a neg full of lies & untruths did i as artrur did to me.
Thank you Tarrus, I now look forward to next meeting you on a game.
Regarding your unfortunate feedback, I have noticed an odd trend.
Those who seem to be the most 'combative' in their feedbacks or those who have 'odd' ways of playing (and tend to end up on ones ignore list) seem to, in the main, descend slowly but surely to lower ranks. Now before anyone starts pointing out those who are still 'senior' ranks, I have said 'in the main'.
Call me retentive but I keep all sorts of records from playing here (Doubles/Triples partners results, results against regular opponents etc., just my fascination for stats and number crunching really) and the above information comes from taking snapshots of my ignore page once in a while.
This has led me to believe that the natural order of things actually does have an impact on this site. That is to say, the maniacs tend to end up on many ignore lists, while those who play straight and true tend, ultimately, to rise steadily. This begs the obvious question...do those who are of the ilk mentioned ultimately end up on so many ignore lists they cannot get into the games where decent points pick ups are available?
For the record, my ignore list now carries no one above the rank of Serge. Yet at times previously it did. More than half are now Corporal or less, with many sinking to the ranks of cadet and cook.
So, in summary Tarrus, I would say, stick him on ignore, it is my philosophy, that he will dissapear into that great morass of the lower ranks, for ever to be circling like a venemous frustrated maniac, until he ends up dissapearing up his own derrier.
Regarding your unfortunate feedback, I have noticed an odd trend.
Those who seem to be the most 'combative' in their feedbacks or those who have 'odd' ways of playing (and tend to end up on ones ignore list) seem to, in the main, descend slowly but surely to lower ranks. Now before anyone starts pointing out those who are still 'senior' ranks, I have said 'in the main'.
Call me retentive but I keep all sorts of records from playing here (Doubles/Triples partners results, results against regular opponents etc., just my fascination for stats and number crunching really) and the above information comes from taking snapshots of my ignore page once in a while.
This has led me to believe that the natural order of things actually does have an impact on this site. That is to say, the maniacs tend to end up on many ignore lists, while those who play straight and true tend, ultimately, to rise steadily. This begs the obvious question...do those who are of the ilk mentioned ultimately end up on so many ignore lists they cannot get into the games where decent points pick ups are available?
For the record, my ignore list now carries no one above the rank of Serge. Yet at times previously it did. More than half are now Corporal or less, with many sinking to the ranks of cadet and cook.
So, in summary Tarrus, I would say, stick him on ignore, it is my philosophy, that he will dissapear into that great morass of the lower ranks, for ever to be circling like a venemous frustrated maniac, until he ends up dissapearing up his own derrier.
Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
agreed
Now i know what you are saying oh Fruity one & i intend to agree with you. I have many people on my ignore list & most of them are now of lower ranks than what they once were so there may well be something in what you say.
This artrur though is the worst i have come against as thus far & im sure,like you say,he will dissapear up his own bottom. At least i hope so lol
This artrur though is the worst i have come against as thus far & im sure,like you say,he will dissapear up his own bottom. At least i hope so lol
