[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null HOW DO POINTS AWARDED AT THE END OF THE GAMES GET DECIDED? - Conquer Club
Since I've always paid little mind to the point totals taken or given at the end of a game, I don't know the answer, but I just had a single 100-point loss in a game which shocked me at its size since whenever I win or lose, the most a person generally loses is 18-32 points.
Can somebody explain it to me, please. I'm not really happy to lose a 100 points in one shot when there is no description of the risk before I enter a game. And if I can WIN hundreds of points at a time, how come I never have?
It was actually possible to reach 0 points at one point, it was even possible to get into negatives, it was changed damn fast after someone had pointed it out, though, luckily before someone managed to do it. With negative points you would have gained points for losing, imagine that...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:It was actually possible to reach 0 points at one point, it was even possible to get into negatives, it was changed damn fast after someone had pointed it out, though, luckily before someone managed to do it. With negative points you would have gained points for losing, imagine that...
Yep - old simtom really was quite a clever wee bugger. He got within about 20 points before lack panicked. He only just panicked quickly enough! I believe simtom got to be not such a bad player after that - haven't seen him in a while
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.
Under this system I'd be really hard to hit zero points (you'd need to face someone with only 40 points in order to lose anything from a game), but impossible to go negative.
MeDeFe wrote:It was actually possible to reach 0 points at one point, it was even possible to get into negatives, it was changed damn fast after someone had pointed it out, though, luckily before someone managed to do it. With negative points you would have gained points for losing, imagine that...
Yep - old simtom really was quite a clever wee bugger. He got within about 20 points before lack panicked. He only just panicked quickly enough! I believe simtom got to be not such a bad player after that - haven't seen him in a while
ty =p, ya I reached 1 point... but then I couldn't loose any more If I reached 0 I thought I would of got infinite points if i played 1 more game =p Either that or it'd break the game :p But they fixed it before I could do that
Under this system I'd be really hard to hit zero points (you'd need to face someone with only 40 points in order to lose anything from a game), but impossible to go negative.
team game takes the average so if your playing with say 2 colonels its possible to lose massive points even if you have very few