Moderator: Tournament Directors

This, as many other suggestion, went through site wide poll and with high favorable results, it has been then forwarded to the webmaster for implementation approval. This site is handled by one man and everything takes time.Son!c wrote:YOUR ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!!!
AND MANY THANKS / UTMOST RESPECT!!!
also they Play Order is really an issue (randomized).
It seems however if you accept one game last you can influence the rest of the play order a bit, thus influencing 3 games to start vs 1 game to go last (but maybye its just the random part playing tricks on me).
Anyway, i always accepted immediately and found myself always starting 4 or 3 games out of 4 times last..
So that IS an issue, especialy on certain maps where round one pretty much dictates the win
IN ALL CASES: UTMOST RESPECT TO YOU and in debt to your efforts!






Craig25 wrote:- The current options are a KO Tournament where Rounds need to complete before another starts.
It is completely useless.


100% agree!!! Other tournament organizers would also benefit from this scaffolding.jseal wrote:critical to automate the games as this must be the most time consuming aspect of setup and a crushing workload for the organisers. this can be that hard to code can it?


Mad has posted in the thread so seems like he engaged your post, but if your bar for timeline is commenting every 5 weeks nothing happens - I think you're going to be pretty disappointed.Craig25 wrote:5 Weeks have passed since Post - No engagement from CC on any improvements.

Craig, i have replied to all your PM as well asking for update, as unfortunate the answer was, it is the answer.Craig25 wrote:5 Weeks have passed since Post - No engagement from CC on any improvements.


That person is bigwham.Craig25 wrote:Hi Mad
In short, your reply was:
- It was not you who makes the decision.
- You have asked for a load of stuff to be changed and almost nothing has been changed.
- Therefor it is highly unlikely CC will do anything to help.
As it is not your decision, I await the person at CC whose decision it is to reply.
The mail wasn't directed at you Mad, you can reply as much as you like with the best of intentions. But, if you can't make the decision on whether to help, it is pointless.
All you can do is put it in front of the correct person to make a decision. And as far as I am aware, you have done that and they have not replied.
Craig


