
How many tiny fragments will the EU have been split into by 2050? More or less than 100?
Moderator: Community Team


Exactly. I think Scotland will rethink things once they see how strong the UK is outside the EU and how the EU is gradually disintegrating economically.tzor wrote:It's complex because prior to Brexit, they voted to remain in the UK. While they did vote to stay in the EU, I think the financial ties to England are stronger than the ones to the European Mainland. Even if they get the referendum, it would be a squeaker of a vote.


I'm not an expert on Scots politics but there were a lot of complex issues that were involved that resulted in the independence vote being shot down. While the allure of trade is clearly a reason why most didn't favor Brexit, the linkage to the Pound has financial implications that were a major factor back in the 2014 vote. With the UK our of the EU, the only viable option would be adopting the Euro and that's not a very popular option.Ray Rider wrote:Exactly. I think Scotland will rethink things once they see how strong the UK is outside the EU and how the EU is gradually disintegrating economically.

You are right, perhaps China ought to adopt the Western model and simply crumble immediately every time 5 or more people express any sort of discontent.Thorthoth wrote:Tibet... Taiwan... HongKong... Macao... Manchuria...
How many nations would China split into if it wasn't run by brutal draconian quasi-Commie fascists?
Scotland - like most regions of the UK - receives more in tax from the UK government than it pays in, so overall Scotland would immediately lose money by leaving the UK.2dimes wrote:Could they afford to do it. I presume the Scottish pound would drop pretty good, it is equal right now it just has different picture correct?
Also if there was another vote in independence now all the evidence suggests Scotland would vote against independence anyway.It's a bit different from somewhere like Hong Kong, because there's just a stubby rock fence physically separating them right now and potentially you would need a border. I think it's a great romantic notion that they could seperate but pretty impractical.
As a thought experiment, ask yourself some question about how this would work in reverse.2dimes wrote:What are your thoughts on Alba going back to being a country?
Could they afford to do it. I presume the Scottish pound would drop pretty good, it is equal right now it just has different picture correct?
It's a bit different from somewhere like Hong Kong, because there's just a stubby rock fence physically separating them right now and potentially you would need a border. I think it's a great romantic notion that they could seperate but pretty impractical.
Kind of like Quebec, they hate the English speaking parts of Canada for taking over. They can't afford to operate without it though, so they are basically stuck.
All the evidence said brexit wouldn't happen, and Hillary would be president... not taking a said, just saying.mrswdk wrote:Scotland - like most regions of the UK - receives more in tax from the UK government than it pays in, so overall Scotland would immediately lose money by leaving the UK.2dimes wrote:Could they afford to do it. I presume the Scottish pound would drop pretty good, it is equal right now it just has different picture correct?
There is no currency called the Scottish Pound. Everyone in the UK uses British Pounds, just sometimes the pounds printed in Scotland or Northern Ireland have different designs on them.
Also if there was another vote in independence now all the evidence suggests Scotland would vote against independence anyway.It's a bit different from somewhere like Hong Kong, because there's just a stubby rock fence physically separating them right now and potentially you would need a border. I think it's a great romantic notion that they could seperate but pretty impractical.
I think they would end up with the same standard of living, let's put it that way. They might have less of some arbitrary measure of wealth, but the basics of putting meat on the table, etc., would not change much.2dimes wrote:So you think Quebec would be just as strong economically if they separated and became a country Duke?
Having a currency doesn't cost much. It did, when currency meant gold or silver, but in the days of unbacked paper money all you have to do is say "this piece of toilet paper is legal tender" and that's that. Of course there's some short term pain and some extra hassles while you switch over, but in the end it doesn't mean much.2dimes wrote:I think as the OP points out Scotland gets similar transfer payments. They would need a currency if they left and that alone would be pretty expensive if they did not start using Euros or something. If they were using Euros and economically seperate that would be completely different.