[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Comments: All 3 joined within 15 hours of each other in 2011. Two of them have played 33 games, the other 24. JHawl and Sneakyspoons have been in same game 29 of out of 33 games. All 3 have been in same game 20 times. This cannot all be coincidence.
Comments: All 3 joined within 15 hours of each other in 2011. Two of them have played 33 games, the other 24. JHawl and Sneakyspoons have been in same game 29 of out of 33 games. All 3 have been in same game 20 times. This cannot all be coincidence.
Links fixed.
They could just be friends. It's not as if the same one always wins.
Why would someone join a game, and then one day into that game start rooting around for tenuous reasons to accuse his opponents of being multis? Is chuckie hoping to be awarded some easy points by getting his opponents banned?
In the spirit of recent C&A reports, I would like to accuse [player]saxitoxin[/player] of being a multi.
He keeps playing 1v1 games against me and winning. I have noticed he plays many games with [player]nietzsche[/players], including one where both of them played me and saxitoxin won. Plus they both live in North America.
Why would someone join a game, and then one day into that game start rooting around for tenuous reasons to accuse his opponents of being multis? Is chuckie hoping to be awarded some easy points by getting his opponents banned?
Agreed. Given that no-one has made a move yet in the other game, it seems a peculiar action. Wouldn't surprise me if this came back 'OP busted'.
That's fine. I thought I was doing a good thing by reporting. Only to be accused of trying for "easy points", by "rooting around for tenuous reasons". Whatever. Stay classy.
chuckie4201 wrote:That's fine. I thought I was doing a good thing by reporting. Only to be accused of trying for "easy points", by "rooting around for tenuous reasons". Whatever. Stay classy.
You can basically ignore anyone who comments on your report that isn't an admin (red name) or multi hunter (orange name). Don't worry about it.
chuckie4201 wrote:That's fine. I thought I was doing a good thing by reporting. Only to be accused of trying for "easy points", by "rooting around for tenuous reasons". Whatever. Stay classy.
You can basically ignore anyone who comments on your report that isn't an admin (red name) or multi hunter (orange name). Don't worry about it.
Please ignore what Caff wrote. He is neither an admin (red name) nor a multi hunter (orange name).
chuckie4201 wrote:That's fine. I thought I was doing a good thing by reporting. Only to be accused of trying for "easy points", by "rooting around for tenuous reasons". Whatever. Stay classy.
You can basically ignore anyone who comments on your report that isn't an admin (red name) or multi hunter (orange name). Don't worry about it.
Please ignore what Caff wrote. He is neither an admin (red name) nor a multi hunter (orange name).