Moderator: Clan Directors




Dako wrote:Yes. Submit your own logo or use default one that can be modified a bit for you. Sounds like a perfect compromise to me.

MGSteve wrote:
It isn't better. It sucks. It's a very poor design and I see no reason for us to have to go to some plain jane, non -imaginative, non-creative badge of a nameplate when we have a nicely designed avatar that actually has some meaning beyond "this is the new crap avatar that has absolutely nothing to do with your clan but its initials that someone with no taste decided to make the clans switch to for no valid reason whatsoever." Get the idea that I don't approve?!
Shannon Apple wrote:MGSteve wrote:
It isn't better. It sucks. It's a very poor design and I see no reason for us to have to go to some plain jane, non -imaginative, non-creative badge of a nameplate when we have a nicely designed avatar that actually has some meaning beyond "this is the new crap avatar that has absolutely nothing to do with your clan but its initials that someone with no taste decided to make the clans switch to for no valid reason whatsoever." Get the idea that I don't approve?!
Qwert created that horrible thing to make the shield design look bad. There's no way it would look like that. lol.
Anyway. I have said enough on it.
I think it's unfair to have had people enter this contest and then create a completely shit version of the proposed icons they put forward, make it look like they did it, then have everyone else bash them. You could simply say, "I don't like the idea" and be done with it.
Genoke wrote:Dako wrote:Yes. Submit your own logo or use default one that can be modified a bit for you. Sounds like a perfect compromise to me.
+1



agentcom wrote:I can't even tell what this all is about ... is there a way that the images could be posted? I see Leehar's post a while back, but it just looks like this:
Image
Image
Image
Image
... I assume there were actual images in there at some point.









[/spoiler]Yeah.. I have the originals I did without the wind, they are nothing special, and have no effects, here they are.
note* some of the above are a little blurry, if I was chosen to make them for the next tourney, I would make sure they were clean photos... I would also ask for each clan to pick out the main logo they wanted... I would stick with black backgrounds + the main logo the clan wanted to represent them.
Below is another version with the wind, but I put the clan name above the wind, so it is not blurred... this is another option I could work with.

iAmCaffeine wrote:Definitely want to design our own in ATN.
Leehar wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Definitely want to design our own in ATN.
Remember either way you'd still be choosing your logo. The only difference now would be that it would be that you'd choose to not make it block shaped? (With the other version people were just averse to putting it on a shield apparently)
Again, I imagine the designers would be amenable to incorporating the individual clan needs, so for me all thats really being done is to make a mockery of the contest.




Leehar wrote:Option 2 won the contest, we'll now have a discussion on whether everyone wants their own.
[spoiler=Option 2]same theme, all black backgrounds with wind effect on the logos.[/spoiler]Yeah.. I have the originals I did without the wind, they are nothing special, and have no effects, here they are.
note* some of the above are a little blurry, if I was chosen to make them for the next tourney, I would make sure they were clean photos... I would also ask for each clan to pick out the main logo they wanted... I would stick with black backgrounds + the main logo the clan wanted to represent them.
Below is another version with the wind, but I put the clan name above the wind, so it is not blurred... this is another option I could work with.

Shannon Apple wrote:Is that really what this was all about? You were upset because yours didn't make the final round? Tsk Tsk. Look, just appreciate that someone else also went to the effort and created a set, and won. It doesn't matter if theirs was as simple as yours. They won, not you. Get over it. You didn't make any effort with yours either by your own logic. Now it is up to clans to decide if they want to go with the design or not, but it really isn't up to you to step in and say. "Okay, I still won."
I think you are being really unfair to the winner. Give him/her a chance to communicate with the clans and amend their design to people's satisfaction. If people decide that they just want to design their own, then great, that's what it'll be.


Shannon Apple wrote:Yeah, my problem is your lack of tact when addressing others work. Your icons would not work for front page. No offense, but they're not that well done at all. They are very quickly cut out of their backgrounds and are not "designed" at all. These ones are much cleaner. If one was to make proper icons, they would need a large scale version of the image used that they can then cut out properly using the pen tool. That takes a long time to do for 40 images. You would have to give credit to anyone who spent the time to do that alone... and do it properly AND apply them to a design template.
As I was saying, you don't have to like something, but you can be constructive in your criticism, not destructive. That means telling someone what you don't like about what they've done in a civil manner, and then telling them how you think they can improve it. Don't be so quick to dismiss the creator of set 2 as not deserving to win because you think yours are better.
Forgive me for having an issue with the way you've conducted yourself in this thread. You obviously cannot see the error of your ways, so I'll just leave it at that. >.>