Moderator: Clan Directors




+1Dako wrote:Yes. Submit your own logo or use default one that can be modified a bit for you. Sounds like a perfect compromise to me.
It isn't better. It sucks. It's a very poor design and I see no reason for us to have to go to some plain jane, non -imaginative, non-creative badge of a nameplate when we have a nicely designed avatar that actually has some meaning beyond "this is the new crap avatar that has absolutely nothing to do with your clan but its initials that someone with no taste decided to make the clans switch to for no valid reason whatsoever." Get the idea that I don't approve?!

Qwert created that horrible thing to make the shield design look bad. There's no way it would look like that. lol.MGSteve wrote:It isn't better. It sucks. It's a very poor design and I see no reason for us to have to go to some plain jane, non -imaginative, non-creative badge of a nameplate when we have a nicely designed avatar that actually has some meaning beyond "this is the new crap avatar that has absolutely nothing to do with your clan but its initials that someone with no taste decided to make the clans switch to for no valid reason whatsoever." Get the idea that I don't approve?!
wrong-- you tell me that every clan insignia will be in This Middle age Shield , with silouete of Clan will be inside. So i just do what you tell me, and its look totally unrecognized.Shannon Apple wrote:Qwert created that horrible thing to make the shield design look bad. There's no way it would look like that. lol.MGSteve wrote:It isn't better. It sucks. It's a very poor design and I see no reason for us to have to go to some plain jane, non -imaginative, non-creative badge of a nameplate when we have a nicely designed avatar that actually has some meaning beyond "this is the new crap avatar that has absolutely nothing to do with your clan but its initials that someone with no taste decided to make the clans switch to for no valid reason whatsoever." Get the idea that I don't approve?!
Anyway. I have said enough on it.
I think it's unfair to have had people enter this contest and then create a completely shit version of the proposed icons they put forward, make it look like they did it, then have everyone else bash them. You could simply say, "I don't like the idea" and be done with it.
+1Genoke wrote:+1Dako wrote:Yes. Submit your own logo or use default one that can be modified a bit for you. Sounds like a perfect compromise to me.



Looks like this one is starting to go a little sideways. I don't see any CDs around, so I'm locking this as a precaution. I'm sure they'll open it back up again in a while.agentcom wrote:I can't even tell what this all is about ... is there a way that the images could be posted? I see Leehar's post a while back, but it just looks like this:
Image
Image
Image
Image
... I assume there were actual images in there at some point.









Yeah.. I have the originals I did without the wind, they are nothing special, and have no effects, here they are.
note* some of the above are a little blurry, if I was chosen to make them for the next tourney, I would make sure they were clean photos... I would also ask for each clan to pick out the main logo they wanted... I would stick with black backgrounds + the main logo the clan wanted to represent them.
Below is another version with the wind, but I put the clan name above the wind, so it is not blurred... this is another option I could work with.
![]()

Remember either way you'd still be choosing your logo. The only difference now would be that it would be that you'd choose to not make it block shaped? (With the other version people were just averse to putting it on a shield apparently)iAmCaffeine wrote:Definitely want to design our own in ATN.
I agree, and if a better design option had won the contest then, from my point of view, there would be no issue. However, since the winning design is poor at best, and takes 1 minute to make in Photoshop with a couple of filters, I'd rather make my own.Leehar wrote:Remember either way you'd still be choosing your logo. The only difference now would be that it would be that you'd choose to not make it block shaped? (With the other version people were just averse to putting it on a shield apparently)iAmCaffeine wrote:Definitely want to design our own in ATN.
Again, I imagine the designers would be amenable to incorporating the individual clan needs, so for me all thats really being done is to make a mockery of the contest.




why i have feel that in the end i won this contest? Its almost identical icons, ofcourse mine are smaller(because use them for Cl5 tables) and with images what Clans have for they icons previously, also mine are transparent background, and this are black bacground. If i create with same dimensions, this will be identical icons..Leehar wrote:Option 2 won the contest, we'll now have a discussion on whether everyone wants their own.
Option 2
same theme, all black backgrounds with wind effect on the logos.
Yeah.. I have the originals I did without the wind, they are nothing special, and have no effects, here they are.
note* some of the above are a little blurry, if I was chosen to make them for the next tourney, I would make sure they were clean photos... I would also ask for each clan to pick out the main logo they wanted... I would stick with black backgrounds + the main logo the clan wanted to represent them.
Below is another version with the wind, but I put the clan name above the wind, so it is not blurred... this is another option I could work with.
![]()

are you have some problems? I create icons far before when nobody even mentioned any contest. I dont know who are designer, but what i notice its almost same like mine, and this its good. As long he/she want to take all clan icons into consideration, this its ok by me.Shannon Apple wrote:Is that really what this was all about? You were upset because yours didn't make the final round? Tsk Tsk. Look, just appreciate that someone else also went to the effort and created a set, and won. It doesn't matter if theirs was as simple as yours. They won, not you. Get over it. You didn't make any effort with yours either by your own logic. Now it is up to clans to decide if they want to go with the design or not, but it really isn't up to you to step in and say. "Okay, I still won."
I think you are being really unfair to the winner. Give him/her a chance to communicate with the clans and amend their design to people's satisfaction. If people decide that they just want to design their own, then great, that's what it'll be.


Shannon Apple wrote:Yeah, my problem is your lack of tact when addressing others work. Your icons would not work for front page. No offense, but they're not that well done at all. They are very quickly cut out of their backgrounds and are not "designed" at all. These ones are much cleaner. If one was to make proper icons, they would need a large scale version of the image used that they can then cut out properly using the pen tool. That takes a long time to do for 40 images. You would have to give credit to anyone who spent the time to do that alone... and do it properly AND apply them to a design template.
As I was saying, you don't have to like something, but you can be constructive in your criticism, not destructive. That means telling someone what you don't like about what they've done in a civil manner, and then telling them how you think they can improve it. Don't be so quick to dismiss the creator of set 2 as not deserving to win because you think yours are better.
Forgive me for having an issue with the way you've conducted yourself in this thread. You obviously cannot see the error of your ways, so I'll just leave it at that. >.>