Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Okay. Well, I do not work in healthcare in any way, so I respect that you have some expertise to bring to bear. I do read quite a bit, however, and I'm not scientifically illiterate so I do bring some ability to critically evaluate what I'm reading.mrswdk wrote:My responses aren't knee-jerk or parroted from government ministers. I work in healthcare service design/delivery and have spent a fair bit of time recently reading the NHS advice (NHS isn't controlled by ministers), WHO advice (independent body) and views of various international experts in epidemiology.
So, in the end he says the same thing most of the experts say. Reserve these for the health care workers. But in doing so he admits the masks work. His argument is not that they don't work, but (partially reading between the lines) that there's a shortage and we need to keep them for the healthcare workers. Fair enough, I can understand that in a shortage you address the highest priorities first. But that's a completely different animal from what we are being told by the government -- that the masks don't work.(Q)Should we be wearing masks?
(A)The N95 mask itself is extremely wonderful. The pores in the mask are three microns wide. The virus is one micron wide. So you get people who say, well, it's not going to work. But you try having three big, huge football players who are rushing for lunch through a door at lunchtime—they're not going to get through. In the latest data I saw, the mask provided 5x protection. That's really good. But we have to keep the hospitals going and we have to keep the health professionals able to come to work and be safe. So masks should go where they’re needed the most: in taking care of patients.
I'm not saying the masks are the only element. We've been arguing about masks and so most of what I've said is about masks, but I'm not denying the importance of other elements. For starters, they're testing a much broader swath of the population that what we do in North America. That allows them to find infected people and isolate them before they become symptomatic. Also, everybody owns a thermometer and takes their own temperature regularly. This too helps find infected people sooner than waiting for other symptoms.mrswdk wrote:You're drawing a correlation between 'masks' and rate of success controlling the COVID outbreak, I'm saying there are way more factors at play and the evidence suggests it's some of those other factors that are the important ones.
Thank you! The same to you and yours!spurgistan wrote: I hope your family stays healthy, Duk.
It's true. I'm well-stocked on many things, but to be honest the issue of mask never occurred to me before. It will definitely be part of my strategic stockpiles in future years.spurgistan wrote:One thing I think you missed is lack of preparation as far as lacking pandemic capacity.
I addressed some of this in my comments in the previous post. Yes, there's a shortage, and yes, it's reasonable in a shortage to address the most pressing needs first. But there doesn't need to be a shortage. Taiwan was caught off-guard also. Even as the crisis was unrolling, even as Covid cases were entering the country, they retooled industries and redirected production so that they made enough, and then they rationed to make sure that everyone got some of what was made. We are no less wealthy and no less productive than Taiwan. There's no reason why we couldn't do the same, if we made it a priority. The trouble is, that in order to make it a priority, governments would have to stop hiding behind the "masks don't do anything" mantra. It's a simple product to make, there's no reason we couldn't make it. Our governments have painted us into this corner.spurgistan wrote:Korea had an outbreak of MERS only five or so years ago, in which lazy quarantine policies led to a outbreak of a very preventable disease. China and Korea both had SARS kill thousands less than 20 years ago. Both of these events had limited effects in Europe and North America, but had huge lessons to learn for most people who are in government today in those countries. As somebody who lived through the MERS outbreak in Korea, we learned the value of quarantine and staying home unless you had to go out. In contrast, we've had next to no actual epidemics of that scale occur in the US, which is why Trump probably felt safe eliminating the pandemic response team literally two years ago.
And in addition, terrible air quality in both those countries led to masks being relatively common things, as you said (also, to be sure, the belief that masks keep you from getting sick, when in reality they mostly lower the chance of you passing the infection along). The thing about "shaming" relatively low-risk people for wearing masks while there's a vast shortage affecting people who are high-risk is that it might serve a valuable purpose - again, all focus should be on finding ways to avoid leaving home. Hospitals are being told to ration masks. For us to wear masks in order to pursue non-life threatening tasks while doctors and nurses have to reuse theirs for days at a time seems a bit overly self-oriented in a time when we all need to maximize public awareness.
You don't need to stockpile anything. The only reason there are shortages in supermarkets at the moment is because of people panic buying.jusplay4fun wrote:For example, we stockpile Toilet paper and tissues and paper towels by buying them in bulk. Do we need a one year supply of each? Do we need to stockpile one year of food? How do we manage the supply and rotate the supply, too? Most of those do not expire, but rotation is important. And we do keep bottled water around, partly because our city supplied water has has problems 2x in the past year. I usually kept only one case, but now keep 1.5 to 2 around for emergencies
mrswdk wrote:You don't need to stockpile anything. The only reason there are shortages in supermarkets at the moment is because of people panic buying.jusplay4fun wrote:For example, we stockpile Toilet paper and tissues and paper towels by buying them in bulk. Do we need a one year supply of each? Do we need to stockpile one year of food? How do we manage the supply and rotate the supply, too? Most of those do not expire, but rotation is important. And we do keep bottled water around, partly because our city supplied water has has problems 2x in the past year. I usually kept only one case, but now keep 1.5 to 2 around for emergencies
If you're worried about running out of toilet paper then start douching in the shower. It's actually way more hygienic than wiping yourself with paper.
You could take the shower head off, squat and spray it up your ass. Then you don't need to take your clothes off.jusplay4fun wrote:Jumping in the shower after each bowel movement is not practical.
I prefer to take LONG and LUXURIOUS showers. So take your "quick rinse" and SHOVE IT.mrswdk wrote:You could take the shower head off, squat and spray it up your ass. Then you don't need to take your clothes off.jusplay4fun wrote:Jumping in the shower after each bowel movement is not practical.
Although a really quick rinse in the shower with your clothes off could be over and done with in a minute or two.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
”To be honest, we think it’s going to be very difficult to enforce this,” said Maj. Gen. Kenneth Hara, the state’s adjutant general at Saturday’s press conference.
https://www.civilbeat.org/2020/03/hawai ... -arrivals/
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
You can't shove me, you have to keep at least 2 meters away from me for social distancing purposes.saxitoxin wrote:I prefer to take LONG and LUXURIOUS showers. So take your "quick rinse" and SHOVE IT.mrswdk wrote:You could take the shower head off, squat and spray it up your ass. Then you don't need to take your clothes off.jusplay4fun wrote:Jumping in the shower after each bowel movement is not practical.
Although a really quick rinse in the shower with your clothes off could be over and done with in a minute or two.

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Tuesday the US could become the new epicentre of the coronavirus pandemic.
"We are now seeing a very large acceleration in cases in the US. So it does have that potential," WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris said.
Mr Cuomo's warning comes as President Donald Trump suggested having the US back in business by early next month.
LOL, WHO also said no one should ban travel from China ... 30 days after Europe followed that advice they're having to dig mass graves to deal with the thousands upon thousands of dead bodies piling upjonesthecurl wrote:The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Tuesday the US could become the new epicentre of the coronavirus pandemic.
"We are now seeing a very large acceleration in cases in the US. So it does have that potential," WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris said.
Mr Cuomo's warning comes as President Donald Trump suggested having the US back in business by early next month.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
+1saxitoxin wrote:Imagine if Clinton had been president. She'd have followed WHO like her pal Macron and kept the US open and we'd have 30,000 dead now instead of 300.
Trump turned out to be the right president at the right time in history.
No ...jonesthecurl wrote:Would you like a list of ways in which Trump doesn't follow god?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
The Chief has been seen on TV everyday, leading America to salvation, while 81 year old Biden is nowhere to be seen, hiding in the hermetically sealed medical bunker his big business donors built him.Sixty percent of Americans indicated in the poll they approve of the way the president is steering the country in response to the pandemic.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/24/trump-a ... virus.html
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880