Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
mrswdk wrote:My responses aren't knee-jerk or parroted from government ministers. I work in healthcare service design/delivery and have spent a fair bit of time recently reading the NHS advice (NHS isn't controlled by ministers), WHO advice (independent body) and views of various international experts in epidemiology.
(Q)Should we be wearing masks?
(A)The N95 mask itself is extremely wonderful. The pores in the mask are three microns wide. The virus is one micron wide. So you get people who say, well, it's not going to work. But you try having three big, huge football players who are rushing for lunch through a door at lunchtimeāthey're not going to get through. In the latest data I saw, the mask provided 5x protection. That's really good. But we have to keep the hospitals going and we have to keep the health professionals able to come to work and be safe. So masks should go where theyāre needed the most: in taking care of patients.
mrswdk wrote:You're drawing a correlation between 'masks' and rate of success controlling the COVID outbreak, I'm saying there are way more factors at play and the evidence suggests it's some of those other factors that are the important ones.
spurgistan wrote:I hope your family stays healthy, Duk.
spurgistan wrote:One thing I think you missed is lack of preparation as far as lacking pandemic capacity.
spurgistan wrote:Korea had an outbreak of MERS only five or so years ago, in which lazy quarantine policies led to a outbreak of a very preventable disease. China and Korea both had SARS kill thousands less than 20 years ago. Both of these events had limited effects in Europe and North America, but had huge lessons to learn for most people who are in government today in those countries. As somebody who lived through the MERS outbreak in Korea, we learned the value of quarantine and staying home unless you had to go out. In contrast, we've had next to no actual epidemics of that scale occur in the US, which is why Trump probably felt safe eliminating the pandemic response team literally two years ago.
And in addition, terrible air quality in both those countries led to masks being relatively common things, as you said (also, to be sure, the belief that masks keep you from getting sick, when in reality they mostly lower the chance of you passing the infection along). The thing about "shaming" relatively low-risk people for wearing masks while there's a vast shortage affecting people who are high-risk is that it might serve a valuable purpose - again, all focus should be on finding ways to avoid leaving home. Hospitals are being told to ration masks. For us to wear masks in order to pursue non-life threatening tasks while doctors and nurses have to reuse theirs for days at a time seems a bit overly self-oriented in a time when we all need to maximize public awareness.
jusplay4fun wrote:For example, we stockpile Toilet paper and tissues and paper towels by buying them in bulk. Do we need a one year supply of each? Do we need to stockpile one year of food? How do we manage the supply and rotate the supply, too? Most of those do not expire, but rotation is important. And we do keep bottled water around, partly because our city supplied water has has problems 2x in the past year. I usually kept only one case, but now keep 1.5 to 2 around for emergencies
mrswdk wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:For example, we stockpile Toilet paper and tissues and paper towels by buying them in bulk. Do we need a one year supply of each? Do we need to stockpile one year of food? How do we manage the supply and rotate the supply, too? Most of those do not expire, but rotation is important. And we do keep bottled water around, partly because our city supplied water has has problems 2x in the past year. I usually kept only one case, but now keep 1.5 to 2 around for emergencies
You don't need to stockpile anything. The only reason there are shortages in supermarkets at the moment is because of people panic buying.
If you're worried about running out of toilet paper then start douching in the shower. It's actually way more hygienic than wiping yourself with paper.
jusplay4fun wrote:Jumping in the shower after each bowel movement is not practical.
mrswdk wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Jumping in the shower after each bowel movement is not practical.
You could take the shower head off, squat and spray it up your ass. Then you don't need to take your clothes off.
Although a really quick rinse in the shower with your clothes off could be over and done with in a minute or two.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
āTo be honest, we think itās going to be very difficult to enforce this,ā said Maj. Gen. Kenneth Hara, the stateās adjutant general at Saturdayās press conference.
https://www.civilbeat.org/2020/03/hawai ... -arrivals/
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:mrswdk wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Jumping in the shower after each bowel movement is not practical.
You could take the shower head off, squat and spray it up your ass. Then you don't need to take your clothes off.
Although a really quick rinse in the shower with your clothes off could be over and done with in a minute or two.
I prefer to take LONG and LUXURIOUS showers. So take your "quick rinse" and SHOVE IT.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Tuesday the US could become the new epicentre of the coronavirus pandemic.
"We are now seeing a very large acceleration in cases in the US. So it does have that potential," WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris said.
Mr Cuomo's warning comes as President Donald Trump suggested having the US back in business by early next month.
jonesthecurl wrote:The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Tuesday the US could become the new epicentre of the coronavirus pandemic.
"We are now seeing a very large acceleration in cases in the US. So it does have that potential," WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris said.
Mr Cuomo's warning comes as President Donald Trump suggested having the US back in business by early next month.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Imagine if Clinton had been president. She'd have followed WHO like her pal Macron and kept the US open and we'd have 30,000 dead now instead of 300.
Trump turned out to be the right president at the right time in history.
jonesthecurl wrote:Would you like a list of ways in which Trump doesn't follow god?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Sixty percent of Americans indicated in the poll they approve of the way the president is steering the country in response to the pandemic.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/24/trump-a ... virus.html
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Users browsing this forum: No registered users