CC's Records of RANKS

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:46 am

What can I say, you just can't go wrong with eight more. :lol:

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:02 am

happy2seeyou wrote:What can I say, you just can't go wrong with eight more.

eight more????

i'm just guessing here, but do you mean How to date eight men at once and get away with it???

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:11 am

Robinette wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:What can I say, you just can't go wrong with getting eight more.

eight more????

i'm just guessing here, but do you mean How to date eight men at once and get away with it???

Hmmmm not where I was going with that one... Maybe I should change how I wrote that.. (see above) Ok, now read it. :wink:

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:20 am

happy2seeyou wrote:
Robinette wrote:
happy2seeyou wrote:What can I say, you just can't go wrong with getting eight more.

eight more????

i'm just guessing here, but do you mean How to date eight men at once and get away with it???

Hmmmm not where I was going with that one... Maybe I should change how I wrote that.. (see above) Ok, now read it.

sorry... i landed in left field on this one... it was a wild guess with a cosmo connection...

okay, so 69 + 8 = 77... am i getting warmer??? :idea:

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:23 am

Mwuahaha. Yeah you are closer (on one aspect of it, but not the other lol). Now say it out loud. :lol:

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:24 am

happy2seeyou wrote:Mwuahaha. Yeah you are closer (on one aspect of it, but not the other lol). Now say it out loud.

EDIT...

i suppose i should let my eyes roll to the back of my head on this one
:roll:

. . .

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:51 am

Robinette wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:69 majors now 2500 plus

another cc record

oh and robinette is # 69

I'm # 69 again... I just seem to keep getting stuck in this position
69 Robinette 2499 348 114 (33%)
and 1 lousy point away from majordrom...

and presently only 55 majors on the scoreboard

Funny how things work out huh? That we used to be obsessed with # of points vs # of games and thought it would indicate our scores would only get higher with time?

Me, you, qeee, MM17.....what happened to all of us? qeee quit, he'd have a crazy score right now probably. Robin, myself and MM17 all topped out early. Then a few months later Maniac came back and score a few hundred points more than any singles player ever had. The scoreboard is certainly a fickle beast!

No one knows that better than Blitz though. He's been up to 4300 and now is at 2600. No doubt he'll be over 3500 again, but its a wild roller coaster of a ride!

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:57 am

For those wondering about point inflation at the top: I've collected data for about 2 months, but there was a big gap in December.

The average of the top 10 has increased by 60 points in 2 months with a upward linear trend, R^2 = .2895 (meaning the data goes up but its highly scattered)

Score of #100 has increased by about 30-40 points in 2 months, R^2 = .3051. Better correlation but still highly scattered due to a huge peak in the middle of Nov.

Score of #250 has increased by 60+ points. R^2 = .8769 meaning it has a strong linear correlation and clear upward trend.

I just started keeping track of #500 and #2500. Only 5 data points so far for each but they have even better correlation. This should all be expected because the score of people in the top 10 is affected by individual wins and losses which are random short term. On the other hand the score of #2500 is only affected by wins and losses of the community in general, because once you win or lose you are no longer #2500. That creates a highly weighted data point which remains steady and shows clear inflation.

I'll post graphs once I have a larger set of data.

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:10 am

sully800 wrote:For those wondering about point inflation at the top: I've collected data for about 2 months, but there was a big gap in December.

The average of the top 10 has increased by 60 points in 2 months with a upward linear trend, R^2 = .2895 (meaning the data goes up but its highly scattered)

Score of #100 has increased by about 30-40 points in 2 months, R^2 = .3051. Better correlation but still highly scattered due to a huge peak in the middle of Nov.

Score of #250 has increased by 60+ points. R^2 = .8769 meaning it has a strong linear correlation and clear upward trend.

I just started keeping track of #500 and #2500. Only 5 data points so far for each but they have even better correlation. This should all be expected because the score of people in the top 10 is affected by individual wins and losses which are random short term. On the other hand the score of #2500 is only affected by wins and losses of the community in general, because once you win or lose you are no longer #2500. That creates a highly weighted data point which remains steady and shows clear inflation.

I'll post graphs once I have a larger set of data.

lol... remember that 1st graph... with me way outta place... hee hee... oh good times... i had fun with that one... yes, we were just kids then...

it would be quite interesting to also track avg score as a ratio from the top... let's say the 80th, 90th, and 95th percentile...
i can explain why, but if you think on it for a few minutes, you'll get it...

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:07 am

sully800 wrote:For those wondering about point inflation at the top: I've collected data for about 2 months, but there was a big gap in December.

Score of #250 has increased by 60+ points. R^2 = .8769 meaning it has a strong linear correlation and clear upward trend.

I just started keeping track of #500 and #2500.

I'll post graphs once I have a larger set of data.

thank you sully, that would be nice.

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:17 am

sully800 wrote:
Robinette wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:69 majors now 2500 plus

another cc record

oh and robinette is # 69

I'm # 69 again... I just seem to keep getting stuck in this position
69 Robinette 2499 348 114 (33%)
and 1 lousy point away from majordrom...

and presently only 55 majors on the scoreboard

Funny how things work out huh?

The scoreboard is certainly a fickle beast!

No one knows that better than Blitz though. He's been up to 4300 and now is at 2600. No doubt he'll be over 3500 again, but its a wild roller coaster of a ride!

the population of the site has also contributed to a much larger bulk of players that are very strong which we are beginning to see a little more parity perhaps.

khazalid · Post by **khazalid** » Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:21 am

i agree w/blitz, standardofplayisrising[the-space-bar-seems-to-be-stuck]

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:22 pm

autoload wrote:400!

400 Nephilim 2000 2576 1601 (62%) Captain Captain 140-6 United States United States

will update

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:23 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?

maybe you dont

400 Captains-CC record

69 Majors-CC record

17 Colonels-CC record

3 Brigadiers-CC record

1 Conquerer

0 Field Marshall

updated

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:20 pm

khazalid wrote:i agree w/blitz, standardofplayisrising[the-space-bar-seems-to-be-stuck]

ty khazy

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:27 pm

73 majors now, new cc record

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 6:56 pm

currently 3 brigadiers and this ties a cc record

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:04 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:73 majors now, new cc record

i helped.

i'm the newest major :lol:

and if i'm not mistaking we had 4 brigs today but warsteiner fell back to major.

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:09 pm

DiM you are right

4 brigadiers, CC record

ty for reminding me

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:09 pm

DiM wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:73 majors now, new cc record

i helped. i'm the newest major

and if i'm not mistaking we had 4 brigs today but warsteiner fell back to major.

congratz

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:08 am

DiM wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:73 majors now, new cc record

i helped. i'm the newest major

and if i'm not mistaking we had 4 brigs today but warsteiner fell back to major.

77 majors now, new record

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:09 am

autoload wrote:400!

400 Nephilim 2000 2576 1601 (62%) Captain Captain 140-6 United States United States

407 captains now, new record

billy07 · Post by **billy07** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:55 pm

this time next year you`ll need 2600 to get on the first page, i`ll bet!

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:36 pm

Blitzaholic wrote:remember the days when there was like only a handful above 2000 ?

maybe you dont

407 Captains-CC record

77 Majors-CC record

17 Colonels-CC record

4 Brigadiers-CC record

1 Conquerer

1 General-CC record

0 Field Marshall

updated

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:36 pm

billy07 wrote:this time next year you`ll need 2600 to get on the first page, i`ll bet!

that is a lot

CC's Records of RANKS

Re: Captains 2K+ common Majors 2.5K hard

Re: Captains 2K+ common Majors 2.5K hard