Conquer Club

US: Democrat or Republican

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Which party do you vote for?

 
Total votes : 0

Postby unriggable on Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:32 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:I don't remember anything about the constitution being against gay marriage and abortion.




:roll:


Not the most attentive one here...
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby Snorri1234 on Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:40 pm

Neoteny wrote:
Ack! Must... not... hijack... thread...


I am currently resisting the same impulse.

Luns, I don't think highjacking this thread is a good idea at the moment. I would like to discuss the issue somewhere else though.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby Snorri1234 on Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:47 pm

But I do think this needs a response.
luns101 wrote:Homosexual couples can already receive benefits through civil unions here. So why are they so adamant about obtaining that term "marriage"? I think it's because they want approval and endorsement from the government. The legal justification for overturning existing law is once again..."it's my choice to do what I want with my body".


Naturally they want approval. They want to be treated exactly the same as any other couple. They want to have the term "marriage" to show that they're not any less than heterosexual couples. The only reason to restrict them having the term is a religious one, not a constitutional one.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby oVo on Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:02 pm

I always vote in the November elections,
but I'm neither of those choices.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Postby unriggable on Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:04 pm

Luns it depends on the age of the baby. I'm all for abortion up to a point - 20 weeks or so into the pregnancy. Certainly once it's a ball of cells it should be able to be taken down as it is essentially part of the mother still.
Image
User avatar
Cook unriggable
 
Posts: 8037
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Postby jay_a2j on Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:50 pm

heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?

:roll:



:roll:


unriggable wrote:Not the most attentive one here...



I post a :roll: when someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above :roll: ) :wink:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby Guiscard on Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:06 am

jay_a2j wrote:
heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?

:roll:



:roll:


unriggable wrote:Not the most attentive one here...



I post a :roll: when someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above :roll: ) :wink:


Ok Jay. How about this one:

If guns were INVENTED to kill people, are pencils INVENTED to misspell words?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby heavycola on Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:12 am

jay_a2j wrote:
heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?

:roll:



:roll:


unriggable wrote:Not the most attentive one here...



I post a :roll: when someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above :roll: ) :wink:


Is this why so many litter your own posts?
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:33 am

unriggable wrote:Luns it depends on the age of the baby. I'm all for abortion up to a point - 20 weeks or so into the pregnancy. Certainly once it's a ball of cells it should be able to be taken down as it is essentially part of the mother still.


Yeah, most supporters of abortion are supportive of there being a time-limit for the abortion. I believe over here it's 14 weeks or 20 or something, but sometimes it's done later because the mother is in grave danger where she will almost certainly die without an abortion.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby jay_a2j on Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:33 pm

Guiscard wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
heavycola wrote:if guns kill people, do wrecking balls demolish houses? Are pencils made with the express purpose of misspelling words? If you shoot someone dead with a gun, can you rub it out with an eraser and start again? If i have mindless, ill thought-through platitudes in my sig, will i do myself any favours?

:roll:



:roll:


unriggable wrote:Not the most attentive one here...



I post a :roll: when someone posts something that is stupid, without merit or just plain too ignorant to respond to. (see above :roll: ) :wink:


Ok Jay. How about this one:

If guns were INVENTED to kill people, are pencils INVENTED to misspell words?



Guns were invented to defend and protect an individual and or nation. They weren't invented so people could go out on shooting sprees. It's no more the guns fault what you do with it, as it is the pencils fault what you do with it.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:37 pm

Actually, they were invented to hunt animals because they worked better than a bow.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby heavycola on Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:42 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:Actually, they were invented to hunt animals because they worked better than a bow.


And bows suck at shooting sprees, too. You might get two arrows off, three max, before some anti-libertarian shoots you in the head with his nation-protector.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:44 pm

heavycola wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Actually, they were invented to hunt animals because they worked better than a bow.


And bows suck at shooting sprees, too. You might get two arrows off, three max, before some anti-libertarian shoots you in the head with his nation-protector.


True dat...

But that is why I have firearms... :wink:
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby luns101 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:20 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:Naturally they want approval. They want to be treated exactly the same as any other couple. They want to have the term "marriage" to show that they're not any less than heterosexual couples. The only reason to restrict them having the term is a religious one, not a constitutional one.


It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.

Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Postby Backglass on Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:32 pm

luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?


It is to the homosexuals.

To me left-handed people are not normal, but to them it is perfectly normal. Should we make all lefties change hands so we can all be the same? Even though it is their preference and they didn't CHOOSE to be that way?
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Nephilim on Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:37 pm

how did we get such a small-minded presidential candidate?

maybe luns is just emulating his hero.....
Liberté, egalité, cash moné

Hey, Fox News: Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo

My heart beats with unconditional love
But beware of the blackness that it's capable of
User avatar
Captain Nephilim
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:16 pm
Location: ole kantuck

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:12 pm

luns101 wrote:It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.


No they don't.

Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?


Very much yes.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby luns101 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:21 pm

Backglass wrote:
luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?


It is to the homosexuals.

To me left-handed people are not normal, but to them it is perfectly normal. Should we make all lefties change hands so we can all be the same? Even though it is their preference and they didn't CHOOSE to be that way?


If you're going to take that angle then it all becomes moral relativism. Two things that are directly contradictory to each other can not both be correct at the same time.

So in your analogy, you're saying that homosexuals were born that way? Care to show the evidence to support that if that is indeed your position. I can show you the quotes that would refute that claim.

Snorri1234 wrote:
luns101 wrote:It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.


No they don't.



Really, you're actually going to say that laws aren't based on religious principles. What are they based on then?

Snorri1234 wrote:
luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?


Very much yes.


Ok, how so?
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

I feel bad for derailing this.

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:18 pm

luns101 wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:t;]
luns101 wrote:It is both, since laws have their basis in religious principles.


No they don't.



Really, you're actually going to say that laws aren't based on religious principles. What are they based on then?

While not always true (take for example some muslim countries), most societies have laws that are good for society and take into account human rights. For example, murder isn't condemned in society because it's against the bible, but because it's just bad for society (imagine a society where people can easily get away with murder) and violates another persons right to live. Stealing is against the law because you violate other people's property. While ofcourse religion sometimes has an influence on the law, laws are certainly not based on religion in that way.
You have to ask yourself whether a law would not make sense without religion. Why is adultery for example not illegal (at least not in Europe), but theft is? Because one is detrimental to society and the other isn't. Both of these acts are considered a sin in the bible, though.
I mean, what is the point of seperation of church and state if the laws are based on religion? Wtf?

Laws are neccesary for a society to thrive because they create a stable environment which is open to expansion.




Snorri1234 wrote:
luns101 wrote:Are you saying that homosexuality is normal?


Very much yes.


Ok, how so?


Because even animals engage in it. Not to mention that the only argument against it is a religious one. Homosexuality is not detrimental to society. It does not harm anyone.

That said, homosexuality is als not a choice. Did you choose to be a heterosexual?
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby Napoleon Ier on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:21 pm

homosexuality is an improper cancer on society. individuals with damaged psychology are homosexuals, the genetic-inheritance crap makes no sense, itis a construct of bolsho-mediatic press.
Homosexuality is an abhorration of nature, which forms weak half-men. The individual's correct formation must pass through intrisically heterosexual instinct, of finding a woman and starting a family, which psychologically is indispensable the healthy individual in the healthy society. Reproducing his genes, and breeding more children Deo et patriae, must be a cornerstone of his psyche. Without it, there is not enough meaning to his presence in a community. Due to the fact ours is so pathetic, the homosexual illness is tolerated, however, a real society based around the roles naturally intended for man would not.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby Backglass on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:23 pm

luns101 wrote:So in your analogy, you're saying that homosexuals were born that way?


I am, yes.

luns101 wrote:Care to show the evidence to support that if that is indeed your position.


All of my gay friends claim it. The vast majority of gays in general claim it. They are living it...I am not.

I believe them.

luns101 wrote:I can show you the quotes that would refute that claim.


And Xtratabasco has tons of quotes refuting that a 757 hit the pentagon. ;)
Image
The Pro-Tip®, SkyDaddy® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:25 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:homosexuality is an improper cancer on society. individuals with damaged psychology are homosexuals, the genetic-inheritance crap makes no sense, itis a construct of bolsho-mediatic press.
Homosexuality is an abhorration of nature, which forms weak half-men. The individual's correct formation must pass through intrisically heterosexual instinct, of finding a woman and starting a family, which psychologically is indispensable the healthy individual in the healthy society. Reproducing his genes, and breeding more children Deo et patriae, must be a cornerstone of his psyche. Without it, there is not enough meaning to his presence in a community. Due to the fact ours is so pathetic, the homosexual illness is tolerated, however, a real society based around the roles naturally intended for man would not.


I can't tell whether you're joking or not.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Postby Anarkistsdream on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:26 pm

Backglass wrote:
luns101 wrote:So in your analogy, you're saying that homosexuals were born that way?


I am, yes.

luns101 wrote:Care to show the evidence to support that if that is indeed your position.


All of my gay friends claim it. The vast majority of gays in general claim it. They are living it...I am not.

I believe them.

luns101 wrote:I can show you the quotes that would refute that claim.


And Xtratabasco has tons of quotes refuting that a 757 hit the pentagon. ;)



=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Cook Anarkistsdream
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am

Postby Napoleon Ier on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:31 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:homosexuality is an improper cancer on society. individuals with damaged psychology are homosexuals, the genetic-inheritance crap makes no sense, itis a construct of bolsho-mediatic press.
Homosexuality is an abhorration of nature, which forms weak half-men. The individual's correct formation must pass through intrisically heterosexual instinct, of finding a woman and starting a family, which psychologically is indispensable the healthy individual in the healthy society. Reproducing his genes, and breeding more children Deo et patriae, must be a cornerstone of his psyche. Without it, there is not enough meaning to his presence in a community. Due to the fact ours is so pathetic, the homosexual illness is tolerated, however, a real society based around the roles naturally intended for man would not.


I can't tell whether you're joking or not.


because the concept of a psychological health for an individual's health and hence by extension for society beyond simplecure of diseases such as schizophrenia escapes you
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Postby Napoleon Ier on Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:33 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
All of my gay friends claim it.



they would.
In reality, your base is flawed, your vision is blurred, you simply follow an accepted view because it fits inwith the pc trash ou are made to swallow
(no personal insult intended
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users