Courtroom Mafiaday 6 TOWN WIN

Talapus · Post by **Talapus** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:47 am

The sad thing is that after I pointed out your actions, you contributed more to this game then you have since it started...LOL :lol:

.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:06 am

Talapus wrote:The sad thing is that after I pointed out your actions, you contributed more to this game then you have since it started...LOL .

not really I have been contributing regularly. and more than you

Talapus · Post by **Talapus** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:57 am

Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:59 am

Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

i like illy back off

vote talapus

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:59 am

Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

I could point out three posts? I wasn't asked to by you so I didn't!

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:01 am

Hold up guys. This is getting a little to personal. Remember the game. :wink:

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:10 am

lord voldemort wrote:
Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

i like illy back off

vote talapus

uh, tal is in the right here, though I don't think Ritcus was obvious scum. I didn't vote him, but I think overall, that he's got a better point. Also you don't know Illy's role so why stand up for him?

Vote: LV

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:12 am

Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

I just read back the thread. Well Mr. Hypocrite you haven't been that active yourself. You posted TWICE before voting me. Your first post was on page 6: a random vote on NES. Your next post was on page 21.

I have been posting as much as I could and contributing while you haven't been posting anything.

You're voting because I said that hammering without a role-claim is usually a bad move. If he was my scum buddy would I really protect him AFTER he was dead?

Every time you posted you voted someone. You're rather eager for a lynch with rather no evidence

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:16 am

Iliad wrote:
Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

I just read back the thread. Well Mr. Hypocrite you haven't been that active yourself. You posted TWICE before voting me. Your first post was on page 6: a random vote on NES. Your next post was on page 21.

I have been posting as much as I could and contributing while you haven't been posting anything.

You're voting because I said that hammering without a role-claim is usually a bad move. If he was my scum buddy would I really protect him AFTER he was dead?

Every time you posted you voted someone. You're rather eager for a lynch with rather no evidence

You can't gather that info from 2 posts. -_- If he voted every time in 4 posts, all in the same day, that would be different.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:19 am

Fircoal wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

I just read back the thread. Well Mr. Hypocrite you haven't been that active yourself. You posted TWICE before voting me. Your first post was on page 6: a random vote on NES. Your next post was on page 21.

I have been posting as much as I could and contributing while you haven't been posting anything.

You're voting because I said that hammering without a role-claim is usually a bad move. If he was my scum buddy would I really protect him AFTER he was dead?

Every time you posted you voted someone. You're rather eager for a lynch with rather no evidence

You can't gather that info from 2 posts. -_- If he voted every time in 4 posts, all in the same day, that would be different.

But seeing from all of his rather small posts he has been voting

FiveThreeEight · Post by **FiveThreeEight** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:44 am

Fircoal wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:
Talapus wrote:Useless spam is not a contribution. You couldn't even point out 3 posts that were worthwhile before I pointed out your slacking. Seriously dude, try to be a bit more original.

i like illy back off

vote talapus

uh, tal is in the right here, though I don't think Ritcus was obvious scum. I didn't vote him, but I think overall, that he's got a better point. Also you don't know Illy's role so why stand up for him?

Vote: LV

Voldemort, you were pretty quick to just jump in and defend Iliad because "you like him." Last time I checked, this game wasn't about if you liked someone or not, but whether they were scum or not.

It sounds like Iliad and Talapus are going at each other for doing the same thing. Neither one of you has been that active.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:34 am

yer my bad, i was skim reading and i thought talp was having a masive go... so unvote

ill leave as that til i see fit

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:44 am

So you vote someone who appears to have produced a decent lead just because you "like" the guy who is being accused? Then when called on it you backtrack immediately. I think talapus argument against iliad is a strong one which is well researched and there are no other leads right now barring AD's "hunches" so vote Iliad and FOS Lord Voldemort.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:51 am

nagerous wrote:So you vote someone who appears to have produced a decent lead just because you "like" the guy who is being accused? Then when called on it you backtrack immediately. I think talapus argument against iliad is a strong one which is well researched and there are no other leads right now barring AD's "hunches" so vote Iliad and FOS Lord Voldemort.

ok parden me for not knowing, but wat is fos??
and i only backtracked cause i never intended to keep that vote, i agree with talp for now, ill wait til illy gets on in like 8 hours or so b4 to see wat he says b4 voting though

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:00 am

FOS stands for Finger of Suspicion

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:09 am

nagerous wrote:FOS stands for Finger of Suspicion

ah ok that sucks, people are suspicious at me...so i know wat are they suspicious of, me being scum? or just being an idiot or something else?? or is it some big secret i cant know about

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:47 am

lord voldemort wrote:
nagerous wrote:FOS stands for Finger of Suspicion

ah ok that sucks, people are suspicious at me...so i know wat are they suspicious of, me being scum? or just being an idiot or something else?? or is it some big secret i cant know about

it means they're pretty sure you're scum, but don't have enough evidence/ are already voting someone they have more evidence for

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:52 am

mr. incrediball wrote:
lord voldemort wrote:
nagerous wrote:FOS stands for Finger of Suspicion

ah ok that sucks, people are suspicious at me...so i know wat are they suspicious of, me being scum? or just being an idiot or something else?? or is it some big secret i cant know about

it means they're pretty sure you're scum, but don't have enough evidence/ are already voting someone they have more evidence for

cheers for clearing that up...im afraid of saying things cause i keep convicting myself

FiveThreeEight · Post by **FiveThreeEight** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:51 am

Well, due to the fact that we've been hammering lynches down without giving due time for roleclaims (I guess), I will say that I'm leaning towards Iliad for a vote. It's the best thing that we have to go on until AD can better explain his hunch.

Voldemort, I guess we can chalk your situation up to one of two things: either you really didn't realize what you were doing, being a new player and all, or you are really good at acting like you had no idea.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:57 am

FiveThreeEight wrote:Well, due to the fact that we've been hammering lynches down without giving due time for roleclaims (I guess), I will say that I'm leaning towards Iliad for a vote. It's the best thing that we have to go on until AD can better explain his hunch.

Voldemort, I guess we can chalk your situation up to one of two things: either you really didn't realize what you were doing, being a new player and all, or you are really good at acting like you had no idea.

this is my second mafia...make an educated guess :wink:

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:57 am

id like AD to beta explain his hunch...

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:06 pm

lord voldemort wrote:id like AD to beta explain his hunch...

Sorry, no can do...

It's just a hunch... Nothing more.

lord voldemort · Post by **lord voldemort** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:11 pm

cena vote count??

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:12 pm

im ill

ill do it later/tomorow when I can count and spell

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:20 pm

cena-rules wrote:im ill

ill do it later/tomorow when I can count and spell

Excuses are like assholes, Cena... Everyone has one and they all stink.

:wink: