yankeefan984 wrote:freezie wrote:yankeefan984 wrote:Talk like Yoda, you do.
But Yoda I am!
But yoda is a short green punk. Mace Windu is better.
Mace Windu rocks

A strong warrior Yoda is, though.
Moderator: Community Team
freezie wrote:yankeefan984 wrote:freezie wrote:yankeefan984 wrote:Talk like Yoda, you do.
But Yoda I am!
But yoda is a short green punk. Mace Windu is better.
Mace Windu rocks![]()
A strong warrior Yoda is, though.
freezie wrote:Arbustos wrote:Dictatorial.
And Hitler wasn't very wise... do you mean he was intelligent?
Thanks.
And I mean he was intelligent in a way, at least he wasn't stupid.
He was a complete racist, so basicly an idiot, but to control a few countries and start up the WWII, there HAS to be a brain somewhere. So he wasn't stupid.
Rahm beleive smart people are peaceful. This is uterly wrong.
Arbustos wrote:freezie wrote:Arbustos wrote:Dictatorial.
And Hitler wasn't very wise... do you mean he was intelligent?
Thanks.
And I mean he was intelligent in a way, at least he wasn't stupid.
He was a complete racist, so basicly an idiot, but to control a few countries and start up the WWII, there HAS to be a brain somewhere. So he wasn't stupid.
Rahm beleive smart people are peaceful. This is uterly wrong.
Alright... I agree; if anything, it's wise people that are peaceful.
freezie wrote:Yoda is weak? Mace Windu would struggle against him, in a lightsaber duel that is.
In the force, Yoda is the strongest of all.
Serbia wrote:All this global warming nonsense is really getting on my nerves. Lets assume that there is global warming. And that it is even caused by man. Tell me, please, why the current temperature is the only temperature that we should have? Please, explain that.
Now also, I'll assume you all are good evolutionists. So, lets pretend, that the earth is ONLY 10 million years old. Very conservative, by all our evolutionary models, I'm sure you'll agree. Now, lets look at our vast data on climate. Our records date back what, about 100 years? (also, does anyone find it interesting that seemingly every high temperature record that gets broken now, was originally set in the 1930's? I tell you, sure seems like here in the Detroit area, that's where all the records come from... and, uh, there were no SUV's then, a much lower population... but I digress) So we have 100 years worth of data. Out of a possible 10 million. (being conservative) So what you're telling me, is based on your evolutionary data, you are taking .001% of our possible climate history, and using that very limited information to dictate to us what the ideal temperature for our planet should be?! Does this REALLY make sense? And tell me, how scientific a model is it if you're only looking at .001% of the data?!
Now, this doesn't even get into the argument that you people have no idea the immense size of the planet earth, and how arrogant you really are to think that humans can so affect global climate. But really, this global warming scare is just that, A SCARE. Please people, stop with the nonsense.
And to the brilliant minds who feel that we need to reduce the earth's population, do us all a huge favor then. Start with yourselves. You'll be following your climate-based religion, right?
Serbia wrote:All this global warming nonsense is really getting on my nerves. Lets assume that there is global warming. And that it is even caused by man. Tell me, please, why the current temperature is the only temperature that we should have? Please, explain that.
Now also, I'll assume you all are good evolutionists. So, lets pretend, that the earth is ONLY 10 million years old. Very conservative, by all our evolutionary models, I'm sure you'll agree. Now, lets look at our vast data on climate. Our records date back what, about 100 years? (also, does anyone find it interesting that seemingly every high temperature record that gets broken now, was originally set in the 1930's? I tell you, sure seems like here in the Detroit area, that's where all the records come from... and, uh, there were no SUV's then, a much lower population... but I digress) So we have 100 years worth of data. Out of a possible 10 million. (being conservative) So what you're telling me, is based on your evolutionary data, you are taking .001% of our possible climate history, and using that very limited information to dictate to us what the ideal temperature for our planet should be?! Does this REALLY make sense? And tell me, how scientific a model is it if you're only looking at .001% of the data?!
Now, this doesn't even get into the argument that you people have no idea the immense size of the planet earth, and how arrogant you really are to think that humans can so affect global climate. But really, this global warming scare is just that, A SCARE. Please people, stop with the nonsense.
And to the brilliant minds who feel that we need to reduce the earth's population, do us all a huge favor then. Start with yourselves. You'll be following your climate-based religion, right?
klinlin wrote:Intelligiance is not a product of DNA
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap