Holy shark baby!

[jnd94]

what happened....
http://elections-o.channel.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/shark-pregnant-in-aquarium-with-no-males/20070625065909990001

[dwightschrute]

whoa

[unriggable]

You didn't know that? It's well established at this point that females can reproduce asexually.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18809674/

[DirtyDishSoap]

I thought this was common knowledge, guess not

[jnd94]

I thought this was common knowledge, guess not

no, I didnt know that at all......well now I look stupid *runs into corner and cries*

[MeDeFe]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

[jnd94]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

[unriggable]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

[jnd94]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

in this one right here? Ya, he is a pretty good arguer. Again, I dont venture into political and or religious debates because I dont know enough to prove a point.

[unriggable]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

in this one right here? Ya, he is a pretty good arguer. Again, I dont venture into political and or religious debates because I dont know enough to prove a point.

As far as religion goes, you don't need proof for anything.

[Fircoal]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

I am smart enough to. But I'm to lazy to.

[Skittles!]

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

in this one right here? Ya, he is a pretty good arguer. Again, I dont venture into political and or religious debates because I dont know enough to prove a point.

As far as religion goes, you don't need proof for anything.

Lawl, that's pretty true.

[debra79]

It would be way cooler if it turned out the shark mated outside her species. Can't wait for the DNA tests.

[Optimus Prime]

^^^^ I agree.