Not necessarily.
EW claims to have an ELECTRIC boogaloo torch which he's brandishing around.
Pouring water on that could be the worst thing you could do.
Gameplay seems weird to me king. Why the random vote then unvote?
Voted because you had not posted for a long time, then unvoted since I did not think that was a good enough reason, and you are not the only one that has not been very active.
I stick with my view some days ago that the early reticent to post players - King, Strike, Traf, Homer remain the most suspicious to me.
And behind them of the early posting players EW. I think a second time in a row mafia EW, might play a D1 like he has.
Kong is the player I'm most ambiguous about.
As things stand I'm most likely to vote Strike again early D2. - but it would be an easily swayed potshot vote - as todays is.
Maxleod last post was made on Sun Mar 30, 2025 9:05 pm. Max got his PM warning on Thu Apr 03, 2025 11:31 pm but no reaction whatsoever.. Sun Mar 30, 2025 9:05 pm till now is 12 days..
Due to those facts Max is now the first player to got himself auto-primed making a N1 "ignite kill" action possible for the arsonist.
Mod ruling: If Max doesn't post before deadline the arsonist gets a free "double night action" aka a "arsonist happy hour" where the arsonist can prime and ignite on the same night.
This means if he so chooses to prime a target first the arsonist can ignite 2 players, one being ignited is ofcourse Max, the other being the arsonist N1 target to be "primed" choice...
Max will be informed by PM "Sent: Fri Apr 11, 2025 12:16 am".
I'm not too suspicious of Loose. I'm fairly suspicious of everyone else. I'm quite suspicious of Charle. Where does everyone stand? Let's get some reads on record, so that we can return to them, follow developments, etc.
I am not suspicious of anybody at the moment, not even of aRgian who is voting me for no reason Night actions will hopefully give us more info tomorrow and I agree with Traf here, we will have one extra person if we go with "No Lynch".
Max could be the arsonist or not.. Town can ofcourse ask Max and see what Max has to say about it..
It's solely up to the firefighter to decide wether he should unprime somebody, and in the case of multiple possible fires or priming set-ups, to choose the best "unprime" option / who to best protect from a "ignite kill" (the firefighters night action protects a player from being primed, removes the primed lingering effect from a previous night, and protects a player from dying due to being ignited the same night all at the same time). The firefighter can also choose to self target (for an unlimited amount).
The firefighter role and the auto-prime mechanic can also be played out for tactical advantage going forward D2.
So after D1 there will be no more "self-dousing" updates or auto-prime trigger warnings in thread (only by PM). And town should consider themselves warned that if any player gets AWOL for 12 real life days or more there could be some other consequences like a "arsonist happy hour".. This also means players can feel free to (even falsely) claim they have received their PM "auto-prime" warning. Falsely claiming to have received a mod PM (for wanting extra protection for selfish reasons or removing the possible primed lingering effect from a previous night) is allowed. This is a mafia game after all. The mafia does not play nice, does not follow rules. The Mafia plays solely to win.
I am town reading Loose. Im also mostly liking what Rag has been saying but it's way too early to declare a town read on Rag. The King vote unvote is slightly interesting but most people have been playing it safe and just arguing the merits of no lynch vs Lynch and with the exception of Loose, I feel like most have mostly let me and to a lesser extent EW slide on mostly just defending the pro-pressure votes position for D1 without pressing hard into actual reads.
I dont see your case on Charle, Ragian. You seem to be saying he aheee with you on lynching but then sided with Loose for no lynch but at least in game, it looks like he's been consistent on the no lynch point with his agreement with you being mostly that he likes the priming inactives mechanics.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
The point of voting Charle had nothing to do with other than him misrepresenting what I said and then seeing how everyone reacted to it. Charle dismissed it rather than addressed it, which goes into my spreadsheet of possible scum. You're the only one commenting on it, so I've also jotted down everyone else (to a lesser extent) in my spreadsheet of possible scum.
On Charle, I do think dismissiveness can be a mafia trait.
I've felt D1 as the Rag Charle action has developed its been indistinguishable from town on town, from 2 players who have been actively putting themselves out there.
I'd have felt very uncomfortable about contributing to a D1 lynch on Charle, or even lynch pressure leading to a claim too early from Charle.
The two things I have to mull over as a consequence of Strike and Rags posts are;
1. Aside from liking Strikes post - does it in itself sway my early assessment of Strike as being Mafia possible?
2. Has there been anything Mafia indicative about Charle that I've passed over?