Moderator: Community Team
https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris ... 0441677ec8More than 67 million people watched Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debate. That’s way up from June

Or they watch it for entertainment. Both sides think the opponent is an idiot. So, they want to watch for sound bites.jusplay4fun wrote:Since so many watched the Debate (nearly 40% of the likely voters) I would argue that the Debates are STILL Relevant to most voters.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris ... 0441677ec8More than 67 million people watched Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debate. That’s way up from June
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
That was my first thought. It absolutely depends on what echo chamber you enter as to what info you are going to hear.mookiemcgee wrote: America has becomes entirely silo'd on social media, people are only fed what they have shown they are predisposed to believe Duk... it's a sad state of affairs.
Want liberal memes of people showing their pets reactions to Trump, and tons of post showing fox news pundits saying Trump clearly lost? You can find that on Reddit.
Want conservative memes with AI images of Trump hugging animals (irl Trump doesn't touch animals often, last image i can find is with a beagle in 2015)? twitter is now x, and Elon's algos prioritize right wing content now so you will get what you came for!
Don't want to pick a liberal or conservative option? Let facebook or tiktok learn what you like and then feed you a healthy portion of it every time you log on, while blocking the content you don't! Letting the algo decide means you can maintain the facade of believing you are getting a real mix of both side when that couldn't be farther from the truth!!!
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
kentington wrote:That was my first thought. It absolutely depends on what echo chamber you enter as to what info you are going to hear.mookiemcgee wrote: America has becomes entirely silo'd on social media, people are only fed what they have shown they are predisposed to believe Duk... it's a sad state of affairs.
Want liberal memes of people showing their pets reactions to Trump, and tons of post showing fox news pundits saying Trump clearly lost? You can find that on Reddit.
Want conservative memes with AI images of Trump hugging animals (irl Trump doesn't touch animals often, last image i can find is with a beagle in 2015)? twitter is now x, and Elon's algos prioritize right wing content now so you will get what you came for!
Don't want to pick a liberal or conservative option? Let facebook or tiktok learn what you like and then feed you a healthy portion of it every time you log on, while blocking the content you don't! Letting the algo decide means you can maintain the facade of believing you are getting a real mix of both side when that couldn't be farther from the truth!!!
r/politics hates anything Trump and will not allow anything to remain that could benefit him.
r/conservative is the small corner of Reddit that still won't get you banned for liking Trump.
But X definitely favors Trump or is at least a lot more open to him.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
I do not think everyone there is there for sound bites. If I did, I would wait for those and NOT watch the entire debate feed (90+ minutes). I watched the Debate so that I can form MY OWN OPINION without influences of media and talking heads. Imagine THAT, someone trying to watch and listen without biases.kentington wrote:Or they watch it for entertainment. Both sides think the opponent is an idiot. So, they want to watch for sound bites.jusplay4fun wrote:Since so many watched the Debate (nearly 40% of the likely voters) I would argue that the Debates are STILL Relevant to most voters.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris ... 0441677ec8More than 67 million people watched Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debate. That’s way up from June
It's probably obviously a mix of everything. But that doesn't mean that debates are relevant in a way that would sway their opinion on voting.

Totally. Some people will watch it with unbiased opinions, but probably not many. I didn't mean mine to sound argumentative or that 67 million people all watched it for entertainment.jusplay4fun wrote:I do not think everyone there is there for sound bites. If I did, I would wait for those and NOT watch the entire debate feed (90+ minutes). I watched the Debate so that I can form MY OWN OPINION without influences of media and talking heads. Imagine THAT, someone trying to watch and listen without biases.kentington wrote: Or they watch it for entertainment. Both sides think the opponent is an idiot. So, they want to watch for sound bites.
It's probably obviously a mix of everything. But that doesn't mean that debates are relevant in a way that would sway their opinion on voting.
And 67 million is not an insignificant number because it does not support your view of WHY others watched. That is nearly 40% or so of the electorate. NOT everyone agrees with you and watch for the SAME reason you did.
And I already said not many opinions were changed due the the Debate. This election is ALREADY Polarized and only some 10% (and likely closer to 5% or less) of the electorate is likely undecided NOW.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
Responding to both of you.kentington wrote:Totally. Some people will watch it with unbiased opinions, but probably not many. .jusplay4fun wrote: And I already said not many opinions were changed due the the Debate. .
I think I have already said nearly ALL this, several times. The only change is that the number of undecided shrinks.Dukasaur wrote:Responding to both of you.kentington wrote:Totally. Some people will watch it with unbiased opinions, but probably not many. .jusplay4fun wrote: And I already said not many opinions were changed due the the Debate. .
I'm sure not many minds were changed.But there's not many in play. Only six (possibly twelve in the most extremely optimistic view) states are considered "battleground states". The remainder don't matter. In those six states, probably less than 10%, and possibly as few as 3%, of the voters are undecided. I've heard some analysts say the election could be decided by as few as 20,000 votes.
That's the unfortunate reality of a district-based first-past-the-post system. Most people's votes don't matter. The vast majority of Californians who will vote for Harris, and the vast majority of Texans who will vote for Trump, are both equally unimportant. Both have already been written off by the strategists of both parties.
The difference in the popular vote might be as much as 5 million, but the votes that actually count might be as few as 20,000.
