should be as all other challenges with the first to reach the top place to win, therefore I believe the next step to take the first spot would be to get 22 straight wins
Mad777 wrote:should be as all other challenges with the first to reach the top place to win, therefore I believe the next step to take the first spot would be to get 22 straight wins
So, 22 out of 22 is better than 21 out of 21? I mean, if we look at who reached 100 percent first then 21 our of 21 was first.
Mad777 wrote:should be as all other challenges with the first to reach the top place to win, therefore I believe the next step to take the first spot would be to get 22 straight wins
So, 22 out of 22 is better than 21 out of 21? I mean, if we look at who reached 100 percent first then 21 our of 21 was first.
I can't be sure if having a higher game completed with no loss takes over or not...but that is only what I'm thinking...a 100% tie would be with the same % with the same amount of game...same if the same % is reached with different token than Iron Maid has.
I will try to get an answer because I'm also interested to know...I have 3/3 game wins so far
Lancelot du Lac and Unai have had all of their tokens stripped for this challenge due to abuse of the system. Though the C&A case brought this to our attention, this was an independent decision by the Community Team after our own investigation.
ANY reported abuse (through C&A or otherwise) will be strictly monitored and punishments will be harsh.
Personally I do not understand this decision. I don't see why all the tokens are removed. We are talking about 40 parties. In this case should they be removed from the stats of conquer?
josko.ri wrote:I am also not interested for Bronze medal because I was 4th ranked.
My motivation in reporting C&A case was only to reveal injustice but not to personally benefit from that injustice.
Maybe you can just void Bronze medal this time or award it to someone ranked lower than me.
I know that your motivation for filing that report was not about raising your position on the board. It did, though and you earned the bronze medal.
Lancelot du Lac wrote:Personally I do not understand this decision. I don't see why all the tokens are removed. We are talking about 40 parties. In this case should they be removed from the stats of conquer?
Cheating will always be rewarded with harsh punishments. This is supposed to be about fun and we will have zero tolerance for ANY form of cheating or abuse of the system.
Lancelot du Lac wrote:So I lose all my games for supposedly 2 questionable games.
Josko recovers the bronze medal ... Ok is it enough just to cry?
Don't other games count?
I still beat Josko it seems to me?
Why not cancel the medal?
Why not cancel the medal? Are you afraid of Josko?
It's not about Josko. It doesn't matter who was in that 4th position. Everyone moved up because you cheated and were removed. You didn't "lose" the games, just your tokens for the challenge. Why cancel a medal for someone else because you did something wrong? People cheating in any way in these challenges makes me want to cry! This is supposed to be fun...