Extreme Ways wrote:Quite damning imo.
Edit: let me add that I dont know shit about this map and now have to choose whether to believe Don or Josko on what is good strat here.
CA Posting Rules:
Only post materials to support accused or accuser, to help out to put a projector light on the way to the solution of the matter...
Otherwise, take your step to the GD forums to discuss below.
Take CA seriously. Here is not a place for players to state if they do know a shit over a particular map or not,
believe don or josko is your business, what does it adds to the case really ?
Extreme Ways wrote:Lancelot du Lac wrote:Well I am surprised to read all of this. Are there several of you in your brain to have thought of this plan?
Do you think I'm a medal hunter? I played all of these games normally and you could have joined many of this one.
After having had a first game won I was 100% victory. I joined others with settings that I didn't like. And from the moment I chose the right settings, I won a series of victories.
I think you should check out the Iron Maid wins instead.
100% victory for someone who had never played this map with poly's settings. For me Donelladan should be first of this challenge

Are you seriously claiming you played those Madrid games normally?
You are not a judge here, you have got no right to direct questions to the accused ones...Comment as "i do not think accused played those madrid games normally" and of course put ur evidences to support your way of comments, but do not directly question him quoting his lines. This is, CA, is not a place for this. You are not an authority here to question him...
Extreme Ways wrote:Lancelot du Lac wrote:Iron Maid wrote:
Well, Lancelot. Not very nice to point at me. As for the evidence I think Josko has a fair point.
As for my wins. I was lucky to win a few in the beginning as to some players it was very close. I also discovered Parachute was a good setting. So I created those games which everyone could join. And yes I also have to admit that in maybe 3 games I invited a player for a rematch, which I thought was easy to beat. That's all, no more or no less. Don't think there is any illegal play in that.
So not nice pointing at me as the games that Josko mented are suspicious. So time to make your apologies for your remark on checking my victories or make a cheating and abuse report about it.
You respond very quickly to a subject that does not concern you. That questions me.
You question Iron Maid's games and are surprised to get a response? You throw out a baseless accusation and now follow up on it, rather than responding to the actual matter at hand and explaining what can perhaps be explained. Instead you don't state your case other than 'but I didn't gain anything from it', which doesn't take away from the blatant abuse. (Edit: it would bring you both on 85, and I'm not sure how the tiebreakers work, probably on exact percentage and I dont know Josko's score)
I'm asking you again: are you claiming that you played the Madrid games to the best of your ability?
I am wondering, after reading your lines, do you have some sort of trouble with the accused or what else ?
Your tongue, way of speaking, maybe i am wrong but, a little bit out of order....
1st, IRON MAID, is he uncapable of speaking on his behalf ?
2nd, anyone including accused here, may say whatever he likes to say...Why do you get mad over what is said and especially when it is not about you ?
Above all, 1st post then 2nd, and now this last,
would you please explain us what do you add to the case in a clear and clean evidence based way to put light on the matter ?
Unless what you have to say is actual evidence that is relevant to the case and will either assist in busting or clearing the accused, then either
1) do NOT post it
or
2) Post it here viewforum.php?f=6 in discussions, where things should be discussed. It will make a multi hunters life much easier.
Posting non relevant information in C&A may lead to you having a forum vacation.