1. ICON
2. A^
3. RA +1
4. S&M +3
5. VNM
6. BOB
7. RET +1
8. FOED -5
9. DBD +2
10. KNT +4
11. TOFU -1
12. LOTZ +3
13. OSA +4
14. GON -5
15. FALL +6
16. AFOS
17. LHDD -4
18. RGV
19. REP
20. TOP
21. ATL +1
22. LOW -10



that wasn't my plan but now that you mention it..IcePack wrote:The Moose Rankings? M400?

Well if we're making new rankings, than I might make my tweeks to the traditional D400/F400 that I believe would make it better. There are some poor selections of constants imo.iAmCaffeine wrote:A new format of clan rankings are coming soon. More accurate and reliable than the F400 and D400 methods. Stay tuned.
Someone sticky this thanks x
Oh yeah, good pointiAmCaffeine wrote:with top at the bottom? come on lolniMic wrote:Number of multis?
![]()



so don't read it and piss off lolDonelladan wrote:Obviously a ranking about your opinion Caff. It says smthg about you and your relationship to those clans but nothing about the clans themselves.
Boring.


I'm very excited, we've never been so high.hotfire wrote:I cant wait to see how Feb 1 changes these rankings!


I'll take a stab at clans least likely to poach players.iAmCaffeine wrote:rankings are done. can anyone guess the criteria?

Keefie wrote:I'll take a stab at clans least likely to poach players.iAmCaffeine wrote:rankings are done. can anyone guess the criteria?

nah, TOFU would be way lower, and ATL considerably higherKeefie wrote:I'll take a stab at clans least likely to poach players.iAmCaffeine wrote:rankings are done. can anyone guess the criteria?

iAmCaffeine wrote:so don't read it and piss off lolDonelladan wrote:Obviously a ranking about your opinion Caff. It says smthg about you and your relationship to those clans but nothing about the clans themselves.
Boring.