Moderator: Community Team
BoganGod wrote:betiko wrote:KoolBak wrote:Go eat a baguette, Frenchie!! Good thing you're not voting
I live in spain and they have very poor baguettes here unfortunately! I could totally eat a good croissant too... unfortunately they are incapable of doing that here either.
I might not vote, but I've got a couple of american cousins, aunt and uncle that will cast at least 4 votes for Joey. They are also very active on social media to avoid the trump pest back. But we alll know it's game over for the filterless egomaniac senile racist vain lust addict cheese burger in bed eating tweeting-happy selfish nepotistic mysogin corrupt russian spy
Snack on a bulls testicle wrapped in the finest jamon, and skewered with an olive
armati wrote:If Biden wins odds are we get a new war and most likely massive dollar printing.
A Biden victory would be a loss for Iraq
Directly after taking office, President Obama appointed Vice President Biden to oversee U.S. operations and diplomacy in Iraq. At that time, Iraq had begun to stabilize. The once-formidable al Qaeda in Iraq had been all but defeated and relegated to the outskirts of Mosul and civilian deaths fell to about one-fourth of what they had been before the “surge.”
But by the end of the vice president’s first term, civilian casualties in Iraq rose by almost 400 percent to over 20,000, and ISIS (a.k.a. ISIL, IS, Daesh) flew its black flag from Syria through northern Iraq to a point about 60 miles outside of Baghdad.
https://thehill.com/opinion/internation ... s-for-iraq
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:armati wrote:If Biden wins odds are we get a new war and most likely massive dollar printing.
Expect at least 50,000 dead in some 3rd world country by end of next year.A Biden victory would be a loss for Iraq
Directly after taking office, President Obama appointed Vice President Biden to oversee U.S. operations and diplomacy in Iraq. At that time, Iraq had begun to stabilize. The once-formidable al Qaeda in Iraq had been all but defeated and relegated to the outskirts of Mosul and civilian deaths fell to about one-fourth of what they had been before the “surge.”
But by the end of the vice president’s first term, civilian casualties in Iraq rose by almost 400 percent to over 20,000, and ISIS (a.k.a. ISIL, IS, Daesh) flew its black flag from Syria through northern Iraq to a point about 60 miles outside of Baghdad.
https://thehill.com/opinion/internation ... s-for-iraq
Doc_Brown wrote:After all the questions and concerns about whether Trump would commit to a peaceful transfer of power and discourage his followers from violence if he lost the election, it was perhaps not so surprising to hear that businesses were boarding up in advance of the election:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... y-protests
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... stay-safe/
However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
Dukasaur wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:After all the questions and concerns about whether Trump would commit to a peaceful transfer of power and discourage his followers from violence if he lost the election, it was perhaps not so surprising to hear that businesses were boarding up in advance of the election:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... y-protests
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... stay-safe/
However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
It's not very surprising at all. Those are all major urban centres. Large cities (in ALL political systems) are more prone to violence than small towns. Population density is by far the largest predictor of where violence will occur.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:After all the questions and concerns about whether Trump would commit to a peaceful transfer of power and discourage his followers from violence if he lost the election, it was perhaps not so surprising to hear that businesses were boarding up in advance of the election:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... y-protests
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... stay-safe/
However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
It's not very surprising at all. Those are all major urban centres. Large cities (in ALL political systems) are more prone to violence than small towns. Population density is by far the largest predictor of where violence will occur.
That or they don't know or care who wins the election but sense that being in a major city there is a good chance either side could could riot in their area.
It's not exactly a secret that protests/riots happen in big cities, the idea that prospective protestors/rioters come from outside the city's limits to protest isn't exactly earth shattering news.
Also are there any large cities (let's say over 750,000 people) that voted republican in all of the USA?
Doc_Brown wrote:However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
betiko wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:After all the questions and concerns about whether Trump would commit to a peaceful transfer of power and discourage his followers from violence if he lost the election, it was perhaps not so surprising to hear that businesses were boarding up in advance of the election:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... y-protests
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... stay-safe/
However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
It's not very surprising at all. Those are all major urban centres. Large cities (in ALL political systems) are more prone to violence than small towns. Population density is by far the largest predictor of where violence will occur.
That or they don't know or care who wins the election but sense that being in a major city there is a good chance either side could could riot in their area.
It's not exactly a secret that protests/riots happen in big cities, the idea that prospective protestors/rioters come from outside the city's limits to protest isn't exactly earth shattering news.
Also are there any large cities (let's say over 750,000 people) that voted republican in all of the USA?
trump voters are uneducated rednecks (armati, hit red..) or cinical 1% (saxi). That is not what constitutes the populations of large cities.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
Doc_Brown wrote:After all the questions and concerns about whether Trump would commit to a peaceful transfer of power and discourage his followers from violence if he lost the election, it was perhaps not so surprising to hear that businesses were boarding up in advance of the election:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... y-protests
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... stay-safe/
However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
joecoolfrog wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:After all the questions and concerns about whether Trump would commit to a peaceful transfer of power and discourage his followers from violence if he lost the election, it was perhaps not so surprising to hear that businesses were boarding up in advance of the election:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... y-protests
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... stay-safe/
However, it's rather interesting to note where the boarding up is occurring. San Francisco, Boston, New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc... These are all strongholds for Biden, not for Trump. Ignoring all the rhetoric from a few weeks ago, it seems that the business owners who are being proactive are far more worried about destruction caused by Biden supporters than by Trump supporters.
Seriously Doc , you are better than this !
Trump has riled up his base by refusing to concede defeat and throwing around unwarranted accusations of cheating , he is an absolute disgrace as are those of the GOP who are not condemning him.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Doc_Brown wrote:Oh, I'm definitely not trying to imply anything Trump is currently saying (or much of what he tweets in general) has a solid basis in reality. It would definitely not be accurate to lump me in as a Trump supporter and I've certainly been pretty disgusted with a number of the things he's said or tweeted. However, I also had a massive eyeroll when he was asked if he would encourage his people to avoid violent actions if he lost the election. Yes, he and his people are going to be pushing lawsuits and tossing around accusations of cheating. On the other hand, with all the unrest we've had over the past several months, I can very well imagine riots breaking out in various cities if he had won the election.
I have friends across the political spectrum, and a couple of the guys I was camping with this past weekend are very much pro Trump Republicans. In some ways, they fit the stereotype - one of those guys may well have spent more on guns and ammunition in the past few years than I spent on my last car - and they are eating up any appearances of cheating or manipulation of the votes. They absolutely want Trump to keep fighting because they believe he would have won the election if it was handled completely fairly and free of manipulation. But here's the bottom line: These guys are some of the friendliest people you could ever meet. It doesn't matter what political party, race, gender, sexual preference, immigration status or any other defining factor you want to claim. If you're in trouble, they would drop everything to help out if they can. They abhor violence and wouldn't dream of hurting another person or damaging another's property. These guys are far more representative of the typical Trump supporter than Trump is, himself.
I think this is true across this country. We would be a lot better off if people are willing to sit down and listen to where others are actually coming from and start with the assumption that they are, by and large, intelligent people with logical reasons for arriving at the positions they have taken (though their conclusions may be flawed either by bad data or by errors in the logic). They are neither America-hating idiots (as some on the right have claimed) nor racist moronic bigots (as some on the left like to suggest).
Dukasaur wrote:Sociopaths of Trumpian magnitude are, fortunately, quite rare. But they can do an awful lot of damage.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Sociopaths of Trumpian magnitude are, fortunately, quite rare. But they can do an awful lot of damage.
![]()
Trump succeeded a president who literally bombed a country - Libya - into the stone age and who ordered the 16 year-old child of a man who had criticized him on the radio burned alive as a lesson to his father.
And Trump is a sociopath because he said some means things about some people.
Your mind is so twisted up with the breathless drumbeats the savage, bloodthirsty, pro-war corporate media have been pounding into it you don't know which way is up and which way is down.
saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Sociopaths of Trumpian magnitude are, fortunately, quite rare. But they can do an awful lot of damage.
![]()
Trump succeeded a president who literally bombed a country - Libya - into the stone age and who ordered the 16 year-old child of a man who had criticized him on the radio burned alive as a lesson to his father.
And Trump is a sociopath because he said some means things about some people.
Your mind is so twisted up with the breathless drumbeats the savage, bloodthirsty, pro-war corporate media have been pounding into it you don't know which way is up and which way is down.
Dukasaur wrote:I in no way support what was done to Libya. I said it was wrong. But although it may seem hopelessly inadequate to say so, it was an honest mistake. They were helping overthrow a despot and thought it would lead to a democratic government. They were wrong.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Sociopaths of Trumpian magnitude are, fortunately, quite rare. But they can do an awful lot of damage.
![]()
Trump succeeded a president who literally bombed a country - Libya - into the stone age and who ordered the 16 year-old child of a man who had criticized him on the radio burned alive as a lesson to his father.
And Trump is a sociopath because he said some means things about some people.
Your mind is so twisted up with the breathless drumbeats the savage, bloodthirsty, pro-war corporate media have been pounding into it you don't know which way is up and which way is down.
I think you're referring to the American public. Trump's selling of his bizarro upside-down world where real news is referred to as fake news and fake news is referred to as real news has created a whole civilization that no longer trusts its own senses, doesn't know what to believe. When you add in people in other countries affected by this, it's probably 500 million people who no longer know which way is up.
I in no way support what was done to Libya. I said it was wrong. But although it may seem hopelessly inadequate to say so, it was an honest mistake. They were helping overthrow a despot and thought it would lead to a democratic government. They were wrong.
What Trump has done to the U.S. is not an honest mistake. It was done with malice aforethought.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
The delay is costing the Biden team access to millions of dollars in federal funding and the ability to meet with officials at intelligence agencies and other departments
The transition team needs to be recognized to access funds for salaries, consultants and travel, as well as access to classified information, the official said.
In addition, the team has no access to the State Department, which usually facilitates calls between foreign leaders and the president-elect, the official said.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKBN27Q04I
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Users browsing this forum: No registered users