Germany/France/Mexico Denounce Biden Anti-Dissent Crackdown

[nagerous]

America's Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, denounces the crooked municipal government of Philadelphia. Trump is our President now and tomorrow.

Didn’t he try and sleep with Borat’s niece?

[Evil Semp]

Why not just ask who they want to vote for. If it isn't the candidate that you want then tell them they aren't smart enough to vote. Wouldn't that prove that their IQ isn't high enough to qualify to vote?

NO. It wouldn’t.

Who decides the threshold for the IQ? Wouldn't any decision be arbitrary?

[jimboston]

Democrat*-owned and beloved-by-Democrats Whole Foods has finally come out in support of Adolf Hitler and the killing of Allied soldiers.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/w ... -1.5792281

Fake news... you have gone to the Saxi School of Lying Posts... but you have not yet mastered the technique.

In what way is it fake news? They don't want people wearing poppies... which is a symbol of the Canadian forces killed in Europe... because they support the killing of those soldiers... by Adolf Hitler and his cronies and also the Germans during the First World War. They said they didn't want any employees supporting a cause... a cause which in this case included ousting the Nazis from France. That is one cause that Whole Foods employees are not allowed to support.

It’s fake news because that’s NOT the “one cause” Whole Foods doesn’t want their employees “supporting” DURING WORKING HOURS. You yourself pointed to another cause they don’t want their employees ‘supporting” DURING WORKING HOURS.

It’s fake news because you are making an illogical leap... failure to wear a poppy flower in support of Canadian WW2 troops is not equivalent to supporting Hitler.

In almost any case when you bring up Hitler it’s an obvious attempt to use enflaming rhetoric and a sign you have no logical argument.

These are some of the reactions included in that article:
"I find it absolutely disgraceful. I find it disgusting"
"This is absolutely unacceptable"

So... what does this prove?

You wrote that: "You know retail employers have a right to prevent employees from wearing politically controversial items while it work, it’s perfectly reasonable."

Um, no it isn't reasonable at all and it is not legal in Canada. We have this thing called Freedom of Speech. Maybe you should add that to your constitution or something.

If it’s not legal then the employees will win their lawsuit. Link to that if it ever happens. I will not pretend to be a knowledgeable expert on the Canadian Constitution... so it’s possible my comments would be limited to the USA. That said, it’s reasonable for employers to set a dress code and hold employees to that dress code. It may be (in some cases) dumb in the “Court of Public Opinion” but it’s nit automatically illegal and UnConstitutional.

Anyways, after the spineless cuck Democrats were ordered to appear before the House of Commons, they cowardly gave up their support.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/w ... -1.5793069

Please show where the article notes the political party of Whole Foods Management.

This is just proof it was bad PR... not proof it was illegal.

... from your article...

“Earlier Friday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he would make it illegal for businesses in the province to prohibit employees from wearing poppies, after Whole Foods said it had no plans to reverse the policy.”

In case you are not bright enough to follow... this means it’s NOT PRESENTLY ILLEGAL, but that the Premier intends to make a new law to MAKE IT ILLEGAL going forward.

It’s funny when people post article links that clearly prove their statements wrong!

[riskllama]

what is the current minimum IQ to be able to register to vote? can't be all that high - i've heard some folks actually voted for pence instead of trump. whups...

DOH!!!

[jimboston]

Trump is our President now and tomorrow.

You are accurate here.

He is our President now, and will be tomorrow.

He’s about 2 more months where we will call him our current President.

... and for the rest of his life he’ll be called “President Trump” in news articles and interviews...

but he won’t be our current President much longer. Thank God.

[jimboston]

Denise L. Ondick, of West Homestead, peacefully passed at home surrounded by her loving family on October 22, 2020, at the age of 74.

https://www.swgfuneralhome.com/obituary/Denise-Ondick

https://www.pavoterservices.pa.gov/page ... tatus.aspx

OMG a smoking gun.

Not.

[jimboston]

Why not just ask who they want to vote for. If it isn't the candidate that you want then tell them they aren't smart enough to vote. Wouldn't that prove that their IQ isn't high enough to qualify to vote?

NO. It wouldn’t.

Who decides the threshold for the IQ? Wouldn't any decision be arbitrary?

It wouldn’t be based on your voting record.

The actual number could be arbitrary... or it could be based off the median... say you can’t be more than X% below the median IQ.

Unless you think IQ tests are inherently biased. That’s a legit view. If you don’t think that then basing voter eligibility on IQ is reasonable.

I’m also fine with limiting voting to people who actually pay taxes.

[jimboston]

what is the current minimum IQ to be able to register to vote? can't be all that high - i've heard some folks actually voted for pence instead of trump. whups...

DOH!!!

DOH!!!

There is no minimum IQ needed to vote in the US.

You just need to be a citizen, and over 18yo.

There are restrictions for some convicted criminals.

I’m guessing there may be some restrictions for people who are so mentally disabled that they have been “Civilly Committed”... i.e. they have been put under a court order that restricts their rights in some manner. I don;t know this, but presume it is possible.

Your “average idiot” with an IQ of 89. or lower can still vote.

[DoomYoshi]

It’s fake news because you are making an illogical leap... failure to wear a poppy flower in support of Canadian WW2 troops is not equivalent to supporting Hitler.

In almost any case when you bring up Hitler it’s an obvious attempt to use enflaming rhetoric and a sign you have no logical argument.

Maybe in most cases, but not in this case. The official position of the Ontario and Canadian governments is quoted below:

These are some of the reactions included in that article:
"I find it absolutely disgraceful. I find it disgusting"
"This is absolutely unacceptable"

So... what does this prove?

Which proves that it is disgusting, disgraceful and absolutely unacceptable. Yet you accuse me of using enflaming rhetoric.

Please show where the article notes the political party of Whole Foods Management.

The article doesn't need to note the political party of Whole Foods Management. For one thing, political donations in the United States are a matter of public record. For another thing, Democrats* by definition are evil itself, so any negative comments about them are ipso facto true. All evil actions are Democratic party actions and all Democratic party actions are evil actions, in all cases, everywhere.

“Earlier Friday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he would make it illegal for businesses in the province to prohibit employees from wearing poppies, after Whole Foods said it had no plans to reverse the policy.”

In case you are not bright enough to follow... this means it’s NOT PRESENTLY ILLEGAL, but that the Premier intends to make a new law to MAKE IT ILLEGAL going forward.

It’s funny when people post article links that clearly prove their statements wrong!

It already is illegal as per the constitution. Doug Ford is just going to pass a law to make it unambiguously illegal to prevent the obvious lawsuit that would come out of this.

This definition only applies after 1963, but somehow they managed to go back in time and give Satan some evil ideas also.

[saxitoxin]

Battles have broken out between presidential loyalty forces and Biden insurgents in the Washington state capital ...

https://thepostmillennial.com/watch-ant ... washington

Trump must order the military to reinforce his loyalty forces in the forthcoming war. And he must order the armories opened so loyalty forces can replenish ammunition from federal stockpiles.

[riskllama]

pretty sure that would be illegal & more than a little irresponsible on the part of the outgoing potus, saxi...

[saxitoxin]

pretty sure that would be illegal & more than a little irresponsible on the part of the outgoing potus, saxi...

Both are legal

[riskllama]

passing out free govt. issue ammunition to a bunch of gun-toting crazies is legal? president elect biden should prolly look into changing that...

[Dukasaur]

pretty sure that would be illegal & more than a little irresponsible on the part of the outgoing potus, saxi...

Illegal and irresponsible are two of his specialties!

[2dimes]

Golly Jim, why do you need to kick Saxi when he's down. Go grab a Coke and let a guy console himself with his stuff man.

[jonesthecurl]

Kick him when he's down? We should wait until he falls asleep and resurface the road over him.

[jonesthecurl]

He could have a new career as a speedbump.

[2dimes]

I don't even know what Saxi did to you Jones.

[riskllama]

i heard he pulled the old "forgot my wallet in my other shorts" routine @ red lobster on him - classic saxi...

[2dimes]

i heard he pulled the old "forgot my wallet in my other shorts" routine @ red lobster The Crab Shack on him - classic saxi...

Oh, I had not read or heard that.

Ok, Jones. Kill him if you can find the bastard. Sounds like he deserves it.

[saxitoxin]

Protests by Trump supporters continue to erupt across America. In Lansing, Michigan, hundreds of protesters were forced to use clubs to scatter a smaller, pro-Biden counter-protest after the counter-protesters spread false claims that Joe Biden had been elected president.



In Atlanta, protesters besieged the state capitol.



Even the small town of New Braunfels, Texas was inundated by supporters of the president.

[jonesthecurl]

I don't even know what Saxi did to you Jones.

He beat me up and took my lunch money. Then he gave it to Trump.

[saxitoxin]

America's hard-hitting media prepare to fact check and watchdog Joe Biden.

[Evil Semp]

He could have a new career as a speedbump.

Why give him a promotion?

[jimboston]

It’s fake news because you are making an illogical leap... failure to wear a poppy flower in support of Canadian WW2 troops is not equivalent to supporting Hitler.

In almost any case when you bring up Hitler it’s an obvious attempt to use enflaming rhetoric and a sign you have no logical argument.

Maybe in most cases, but not in this case. The official position of the Ontario and Canadian governments is quoted below:

These are some of the reactions included in that article:
"I find it absolutely disgraceful. I find it disgusting"
"This is absolutely unacceptable"

So... what does this prove?

Which proves that it is disgusting, disgraceful and absolutely unacceptable. Yet you accuse me of using enflaming rhetoric.

It proves that the people who were quoted think it’s “disgusting, disgraceful, and absolutely unacceptable”.

Those are subjective opinions.

It does NOT prove the action was illegal or unconstitutional.

Please show where the article notes the political party of Whole Foods Management.

The article doesn't need to note the political party of Whole Foods Management. For one thing, political donations in the United States are a matter of public record. For another thing, Democrats* by definition are evil itself, so any negative comments about them are ipso facto true. All evil actions are Democratic party actions and all Democratic party actions are evil actions, in all cases, everywhere.

So your ‘proof’ is basically... ‘because I say so’. Good to note.

You do a bad job trying to copy Saxi. You should stop.

“Earlier Friday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he would make it illegal for businesses in the province to prohibit employees from wearing poppies, after Whole Foods said it had no plans to reverse the policy.”

In case you are not bright enough to follow... this means it’s NOT PRESENTLY ILLEGAL, but that the Premier intends to make a new law to MAKE IT ILLEGAL going forward.

It’s funny when people post article links that clearly prove their statements wrong!

It already is illegal as per the constitution. Doug Ford is just going to pass a law to make it unambiguously illegal to prevent the obvious lawsuit that would come out of this.

If it were unconstitutional he would just sue and not have to make a law. In fact it’s possible the law would be unconstitutional.

Can an employee in a ‘clean room’ demand to wear a poppy on his ‘clean room suit’ or ‘bunny suit’?

That would defeat the purpose of the clean room.

This definition only applies after 1963, but somehow they managed to go back in time and give Satan some evil ideas also.

huh?