Moderator: Community Team

No. All of THOSE shootings are completely and entirely unjustified.HitRed wrote:Are the police allowed to fire on rock throwing protestors?
Wait? You're saying that the guy in the photo started spraying mace after he was shot in the face?Jdsizzleslice wrote:Gun was discharged before mace was expelled. The picture above proves this point.
No. Do you think it's okay for the president to incite violence?So you think it's ok to murder people, degaston?

That's not what I said. You do realize that mace takes a longer to expel than a firearm. We are talking multiple seconds versus nanoseconds. By the time the man who was shot sprayed his mace, the shooter had already aimed his firearm at him, putting him in serious danger of bodily harm. Brandishing a firearm in some jurisdictions is a crime in and of itself. In the picture, we see the mace in the air has not reached the shooter yet, and the gun had already been discharged. Clear case that this was indeed not self-defense.degaston wrote:Wait? You're saying that the guy in the photo started spraying mace after he was shot in the face?Jdsizzleslice wrote:Gun was discharged before mace was expelled. The picture above proves this point.![]()
Here's a twitter link where you can hear the mace being sprayed before the gunshot.
https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/13 ... 9404485633
Glad we are on the same page about not murdering people. I will absolutely hold you to that. Will you condemn the actions of the murderer in this story?degaston wrote:No.
The President does not incite violence. Your first link refers to a politician that clearly states that when he uses the phrase "dead" he is referring to the left ideology. Did you even read the article you posted?degaston wrote:Do you think it's okay for the president to incite violence?
‘The only good Democrat is a dead Democrat.' ‘When the looting starts, the shooting starts.’ Twice in 25 hours, Trump tweets conspicuous allusions to violence.
Second quote is in reference to when people start looting, then you can expect people to defend themselves and their property. He clarified his statement."I don't say that in the physical sense, and I can already see where the videos getting edited where it says I want to go murder Democrats," Griffin continues. "No. I say that in the political sense because the Democrat agenda and policy is anti-American right now."
Incorrect. The people are what makes things polite or impolite, not firearms.degaston wrote:Also, it turns out an armed society is not a polite society. Who knew?
Dukasaur wrote:Who could have predicted that after only 400 years of white supremacists shooting unarmed black people without any serious consequences, some of the black people would acquire firearms and start shooting back?

Is that an actual picture of the altercation?degaston wrote:Turns out that mace is ineffective as a bullet repellant. Who knew?
Welcome to Trump's America!
Knuckles. More precisely, they are technically rings, but the net effect of having so many large rings is to create de-facto brass knuckles, while preserving plausible deniability. I used to know a debt collector for the Outlaws motorcycle gang, and he wore eight large rings for the same reason.HitRed wrote:Are those rings or brass nuckels?
It appears to be. It's the same guy seen in the Twitter video I linked to. I'm not sure if the gun has been fired at this point, but it's obvious that the mace came first. Don't know what went on before this image, though. In any case, it doesn't seem smart to spray mace at someone with a gun.2dimes wrote:Is that an actual picture of the altercation?degaston wrote:Turns out that mace is ineffective as a bullet repellant. Who knew?
Welcome to Trump's America!
hmm...def. don't look like brass knuckles to me, just some rather large rings.Dukasaur wrote:Knuckles. More precisely, they are technically rings, but the net effect of having so many large rings is to create de-facto brass knuckles, while preserving plausible deniability. I used to know a debt collector for the Outlaws motorcycle gang, and he wore eight large rings for the same reason.HitRed wrote:Are those rings or brass nuckels?
This guy in the picture came looking for an altercation, and he got one.

WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
Ummm.... did you read what I said, or did you just snort some psilocybin and consult the OUIJA board?riskllama wrote:hmm...def. don't look like brass knuckles to me, just some rather large rings.Dukasaur wrote:Knuckles. More precisely, they are technically rings, but the net effect of having so many large rings is to create de-facto brass knuckles, while preserving plausible deniability. I used to know a debt collector for the Outlaws motorcycle gang, and he wore eight large rings for the same reason.HitRed wrote:Are those rings or brass nuckels?
This guy in the picture came looking for an altercation, and he got one.

Looks to me like the other guys wanted an altercation too. Of course only one guy was shot in the face this time.Dukasaur wrote: This guy in the picture came looking for an altercation, and he got one.
