mrswdk wrote:jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:jimboston wrote:Isn’t “some immunity” basically the same as saying “partial immunity” and/or “resistance”?
It is. Regardless of which of those terms you chose to use you were still wrong.
How so?
You are selecting one sentence, which isn’t even wrong, and ignoring how it’s related to the rest of what I wrote.
saxi...you’re an ass

How come you. and Saxi are always posting around the same time?
It doesn't matter whether you say 'some immunity', 'partial immunity', 'resistance' or any other synonym you can think of, someone being any of the above has no impact on their capacity to carry and transmit COVID-19.
I never said it did.
My thoughts, as explained in my original post, include the likelihood that the virus has infected a VAST NUMBER of people (in China) than the official numbers suggest. I’m saying this not as an intentional miscounting... but rather as a complete underreporting due to the POSSIBILITY that people there are getting the virus and just NOT getting as sick as Europeans. Clamping down on social contact alone is NOT enough by itself to explain the numbers we are seeing from China.
Perhaps you should read the whole post and use that brain to try to understand it... as opposed to look for one area where you can attack me because you think I’ve misused a word.
... but it seems you prefer to attack me for some reason here.
Even when there are people claiming China’s definitely fudging their numbers on purpose... you seem fixated on me, when my post is presenting a middle ground that includes a few possible reasons... and I’m just asking “which is the bigger factor do you think”?
I’m not saying “I’m absolutely right and these are the answers”.
Yet you keep attacking... and on the wrong points that are easily refuted.
Usually you’re just an Ass... but today you’re an Idiot and an Ass.