Moderator: Community Team

I will fight you.. send me a PMBrutalBob wrote:I cant join any of the games from the banner.
Every time i click the Join link i get told the game is full
Maybe if there weren't stupid rules like having to play 7 games even if you win 2, the mods wouldn't be so overworked with games.Dukasaur wrote:There's never enough games to meet the demand. There's 20-something mods and almost 5000 members waiting to Whac them.
There's always a bottleneck. Please be patient and keep trying.

This is not the reason. There are some players who join every game they can, and leave none for the rest who want to only play 7 games.iAmCaffeine wrote:Maybe if there weren't stupid rules like having to play 7 games even if you win 2, the mods wouldn't be so overworked with games.Dukasaur wrote:There's never enough games to meet the demand. There's 20-something mods and almost 5000 members waiting to Whac them.
There's always a bottleneck. Please be patient and keep trying.
Even when the problem is not extreme it can add up. Unfortunately, I never really have a break from my life and if I did I probably wouldn't be playing non stop. Never the less, I probably had some thirty some odd (33) games on the table, playing twenty some odd games at a time. (It felt like those expert chess players who play such crazy numbers of games at the same time.) At one point I was watching the Yankees game while checking my Google device for game updates. Several players entered multiple games; not many, two or three, but that adds up. If every player played three of my 30 games that would mean only 10 players were able to whack me.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Ergo, you have some mods who create a 100 games just for others to be able to play. Even then, some players cannot control themselves even after reminders have been sent out to wait to join games at a later date in order to get others playing.

Just create some kind of rule that forbids that, but attach a punishment to the rule. If the criteria for a medal is to win 2 games, then say a player cannot join more than 2 games at a time otherwise they're disqualified. Simple.Jdsizzleslice wrote:This is not the reason. There are some players who join every game they can, and leave none for the rest who want to only play 7 games.iAmCaffeine wrote:Maybe if there weren't stupid rules like having to play 7 games even if you win 2, the mods wouldn't be so overworked with games.Dukasaur wrote:There's never enough games to meet the demand. There's 20-something mods and almost 5000 members waiting to Whac them.
There's always a bottleneck. Please be patient and keep trying.
Ergo, you have some mods who create a 100 games just for others to be able to play. Even then, some players cannot control themselves even after reminders have been sent out to wait to join games at a later date in order to get others playing.
If you think you know a better method on how to run WAM, then post your suggestion in the Suggestions forum. I would love to hear your ideas.

Read This PostiAmCaffeine wrote:Just create some kind of rule that forbids that, but attach a punishment to the rule. If the criteria for a medal is to win 2 games, then say a player cannot join more than 2 games at a time otherwise they're disqualified. Simple.Jdsizzleslice wrote:This is not the reason. There are some players who join every game they can, and leave none for the rest who want to only play 7 games.iAmCaffeine wrote:Maybe if there weren't stupid rules like having to play 7 games even if you win 2, the mods wouldn't be so overworked with games.Dukasaur wrote:There's never enough games to meet the demand. There's 20-something mods and almost 5000 members waiting to Whac them.
There's always a bottleneck. Please be patient and keep trying.
Ergo, you have some mods who create a 100 games just for others to be able to play. Even then, some players cannot control themselves even after reminders have been sent out to wait to join games at a later date in order to get others playing.
If you think you know a better method on how to run WAM, then post your suggestion in the Suggestions forum. I would love to hear your ideas.
Not a bad idea, could definitely be discussed.2dimes wrote:I'm not going in the suggestions forum and maybe this is impossible but.
If possible make each game like a tournament so it requires some sort of ticket/entry token. Send everyone 7 tokens to start with. Once your tokens are gone you have to do something else while you wait.
(Most likely complaining you want more tokens to play more of the games.)
If after a week or so, there are lots of games available and no one is complaining they didn't get a game yet, either send more tokens or make the games public again.
Maybe that would require way more coding than it did to create private games with passwords.
This is actually a very good suggestion. Either let them drop randomly at x rate or do/win something to get them to drop in addition to the starting number.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Not a bad idea, could definitely be discussed.2dimes wrote:I'm not going in the suggestions forum and maybe this is impossible but.
If possible make each game like a tournament so it requires some sort of ticket/entry token. Send everyone 7 tokens to start with. Once your tokens are gone you have to do something else while you wait.
(Most likely complaining you want more tokens to play more of the games.)
If after a week or so, there are lots of games available and no one is complaining they didn't get a game yet, either send more tokens or make the games public again.
Maybe that would require way more coding than it did to create private games with passwords.
I thought about sex with Marilyn Monroe. Helped me get through the nightmare of Whac-a-Mod.2dimes wrote:I thought that about 6 vs 6 team games.

Was that in the Steamy Room ?Dukasaur wrote:I thought about sex with Marilyn Monroe. Helped me get through the nightmare of Whac-a-Mod.2dimes wrote:I thought that about 6 vs 6 team games.
