Moderator: Community Team


It depends... sometimes they say who they were busted with, sometimes not.macken wrote:I'm not very familiar with the way the admins act in these cases. That's why I asked.
I do not know if it is normal to close the posts without explanations.
Or maybe, busted = confirmed what was doubted.
I do not know, and in this case it seemed interesting to ask.
I believe in this case TOP is the opposition and admin the standing regimeFreeFalling123 wrote:Hmm... how can we, at TOP, know this wasn't all a ploy from the opposition to rise a spout? That this wasn't the rest of the community conspiring against us with a fake "busted" P@P account... Someone who happened to be a rising star 19 year old, talented risk virgin, who also happened to be looking for wise, big dicked, skilled members of our clan to take him in?
Hmm.... let me scratch my balls a little more pondering the complexities
haha, It's so funny,..hahahaExtreme Ways wrote: ...
I believe in this case TOP is the opposition and admin the standing regime

You misunderstood me. FF phrased his sentence slightly wrong which made for the completely viable and fun interpretation of:macken wrote:haha, It's so funny,..hahahaExtreme Ways wrote: ...
I believe in this case TOP is the opposition and admin the standing regime
I disagree,
If one account have to be banned by legitimate reason, that's what it has to be. No one has said otherwise.
But what about the unfair and/or disrespectful bullshiters?
Perhaps it's also funny, only when it's about third parties,... I suppose...
This wasn’t posted by FF123.FreeFalling123 wrote:Hmm... how can we, at TOP, know this wasn't all a ploy from the opposition to rise a spout? That this wasn't the rest of the community conspiring against us with a fake "busted" P@P account... Someone who happened to be a rising star 19 year old, talented risk virgin, who also happened to be looking for wise, big dicked, skilled members of our clan to take him in?
Hmm.... let me scratch my balls a little more pondering the complexities

Extreme Ways wrote:You misunderstood me. FF phrased his sentence slightly wrong which made for the completely viable and fun interpretation of:macken wrote:haha, It's so funny,..hahahaExtreme Ways wrote: ...
I believe in this case TOP is the opposition and admin the standing regime
I disagree,
If one account have to be banned by legitimate reason, that's what it has to be. No one has said otherwise.
But what about the unfair and/or disrespectful bullshiters?
Perhaps it's also funny, only when it's about third parties,... I suppose...
TOP = Ruling CC
CC Admin = opposition
Because according to FF quote, this was "a ploy from the opposition to rise a spout".
I meant that it's a stretch to say that CC is the opposition and TOP the standing regime,

You can contact king achilles for more information regarding the C&A case you are mentioning.macken wrote:I just saw the post about Gabriels closed.
Busted is the explanation.
But I do not know what happened or where to ask this.
What happened? Was him really PaP and are confirmed? He has been banned for be multi or another reason?
Leave this unclear, I do not understand why. I would like it to be clarified, if can be.
what do you mean? does P@P still have passwords? or someone else did it?iAmCaffeine wrote:This wasn’t posted by FF123.FreeFalling123 wrote:Hmm... how can we, at TOP, know this wasn't all a ploy from the opposition to rise a spout? That this wasn't the rest of the community conspiring against us with a fake "busted" P@P account... Someone who happened to be a rising star 19 year old, talented risk virgin, who also happened to be looking for wise, big dicked, skilled members of our clan to take him in?
Hmm.... let me scratch my balls a little more pondering the complexities
And naw, CAFF just knows I'd never say something so stupidnietzsche wrote:what do you mean? does P@P still have passwords? or someone else did it?iAmCaffeine wrote:This wasn’t posted by FF123.FreeFalling123 wrote:Hmm... how can we, at TOP, know this wasn't all a ploy from the opposition to rise a spout? That this wasn't the rest of the community conspiring against us with a fake "busted" P@P account... Someone who happened to be a rising star 19 year old, talented risk virgin, who also happened to be looking for wise, big dicked, skilled members of our clan to take him in?
Hmm.... let me scratch my balls a little more pondering the complexities
you say because you know FF's style or because you know whose style that post is?
why not try in the thread, Mack? it isn't locked...macken wrote:I just saw the post about Gabriels closed.
Busted is the explanation.
But I do not know what happened or where to ask this.
What happened? Was him really PaP and are confirmed? He has been banned for be multi or another reason?
Leave this unclear, I do not understand why. I would like it to be clarified, if can be.

Of course I was going to put it there, and it was closed. I just looked again and it's still closed. You can check.............your glassesriskllama wrote:why not try in the thread, Mack? it isn't locked...macken wrote:I just saw the post about Gabriels closed.
Busted is the explanation.
But I do not know what happened or where to ask this.
What happened? Was him really PaP and are confirmed? He has been banned for be multi or another reason?
Leave this unclear, I do not understand why. I would like it to be clarified, if can be.


Both threads are locked as of last night.riskllama wrote:you can still post/ask your question in it.


I saw another new thread was created there and closed too, so I deduced was not the indicated place to put the question.riskllama wrote:pardon me. there's no padlock hanging off it in the lobby - just in the closed part of the forum, weird.


Something along those lines.FreeFalling123 wrote:Pleading ignorance? LOL who is conspiring here, hmmm?![]()
All I know is, we at TOP claim first dibs to this 19 year old sensation once we figure out which multiple account he was associated with, so long as it's not P@P
also:And naw, CAFF just knows I'd never say something so stupidnietzsche wrote:what do you mean? does P@P still have passwords? or someone else did it?iAmCaffeine wrote:This wasn’t posted by FF123.FreeFalling123 wrote:Hmm... how can we, at TOP, know this wasn't all a ploy from the opposition to rise a spout? That this wasn't the rest of the community conspiring against us with a fake "busted" P@P account... Someone who happened to be a rising star 19 year old, talented risk virgin, who also happened to be looking for wise, big dicked, skilled members of our clan to take him in?
Hmm.... let me scratch my balls a little more pondering the complexities
you say because you know FF's style or because you know whose style that post is?Congratz on star... very nietz!
