Moderator: Community Team


Keef, you're ranked significantly higher than the OP. And you're premium, and a mod.Keefie wrote:I'll gladly do this for you, send me a pm with your password.
K
What does any of that have to do with sitting for someone?Symmetry wrote:Keef, you're ranked significantly higher than the OP. And you're premium, and a mod.Keefie wrote:I'll gladly do this for you, send me a pm with your password.
K
KilljoySymmetry wrote:Keef, you're ranked significantly higher than the OP. And you're premium, and a mod.Keefie wrote:I'll gladly do this for you, send me a pm with your password.
K
A lot, I'd say.CatchersMitt14 wrote:What does any of that have to do with sitting for someone?Symmetry wrote:Keef, you're ranked significantly higher than the OP. And you're premium, and a mod.Keefie wrote:I'll gladly do this for you, send me a pm with your password.
K
Hmm, let's see.Symmetry wrote:A lot, I'd say.CatchersMitt14 wrote:What does any of that have to do with sitting for someone?Symmetry wrote:Keef, you're ranked significantly higher than the OP. And you're premium, and a mod.Keefie wrote:I'll gladly do this for you, send me a pm with your password.
K
A player that the site ranks significantly better in terms of skill and experience taking over a lower ranked player's games for weeks?
That seems off to me.
Bypassing freemium restrictions? Hell, if I could do this, I'd be a general- "Sorry, I started a bunch of games, and I need my premium friend to finish them..."
That seems off to me.
A mod doing all of the above? Asking other accounts for their passwords in the forums in order to allow people to avoid CC rules on skipping turns?
That seems off to me.
Symm and Guanaco...Symmetry wrote:A lot, I'd say.CatchersMitt14 wrote:What does any of that have to do with sitting for someone?Symmetry wrote:Keef, you're ranked significantly higher than the OP. And you're premium, and a mod.Keefie wrote:I'll gladly do this for you, send me a pm with your password.
K
This is kinda BS, I never said that keefie broke the rules, and you know this. I don't think it's fair, and you seem to agree with that, and with my larger issue with making sitting fairer in general.CatchersMitt14 wrote:Hmm, let's see.
1. "A player that the site ranks significantly better in terms of skill and experience taking over a lower ranked player's games for weeks?"
- Happens all the time around here. Inherent problem with sitting in general, not specific to one case. One of the major arguments as to why sitting should not be allowed at all, however, that is a different conversation and would require its own thread. This is one guy asking the community for help, not a policy thread. There are no rank gap restrictions on the site when it comes to sitters. What the OP has done is completely within the current site rules.
fixed.HitRed wrote:sym
More interested in trolling than helping.

Not everyone has a helping hand, but everyone should follow the rules.HitRed wrote:symm
More interested in rules than helping.
Woah, I haven't accused anyone of breaking the rules. My argument is akin to criticising exploitation of tax loopholes by the superwealthy. It's not illegal, but that doesn't make it right or fair.Evil Semp wrote:sym no rules are being broken.
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=rulesObviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games or deliberately benefiting from thrown games, intentional deadbeating, holding players hostage, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts, systematically "farming" new recruits and colluding with other players in any way to manipulate the scoring system.
Sums it all up.Symmetry wrote:
Not everyone has a helping hand