Moderator: Community Team

Lol it's quite hard to catch scum that's the whole point of the game. Each time we screw up we shoot ourselves a bullet in our own foot.robellis00 wrote:i did not fight in mitch's war either.
i don't even see how this line of questioning is going to help. if he's trying to nail scum, he's either:
1) doing a bad job by bringing out irrelevant information; leading everyone down the wrong path. ("wrong in his approach" as BuJaber adeptly said above...)
or
2) trying to get us to believe he is someone that he actually is not. pretty deceptive.
how does scum normally get nailed in these games? i'm guessing it's when we catch them some sort of way or expose something they have said. mitch is trying hard to establish who he is and using the scenario to fish for information, hoping to expose someone. it seems to me, he's trying to throw us off, and it is working. now we're reporting if we were in the 2nd Afghan War or not. the only way it is helping is that it is showing us that he's putting a lot of effort into it.
I'm still good with my vote, for the deception.
Now if we can have cabbage with that corned beef, i'm all in.

I don't know how much experience you have with the game in general. I just remember seing you in this forum quite a bit more or less when I stopped playing mafia so I was assuming you've played a few games during that timeframe?dakky21 wrote:Even if I get to L-1, what can I say, I am General as probably all of you and I'm town. Would it mean something if I said the name? And no, I didn't fight in mitch's war.betiko wrote:One more vote on dakky and he's at L-1

Loose Canon has asked for a replacement. I'm too busy today but tomorrow I will start harassing people to replace him.BuJaber wrote:Rags how do you read pika?
Yoshi - is the deadline still 30th or will there be an extension to accomodate LC learning the ropes?
Already answered that question, somewhere around 6-10 games all on cc, and never with such small amount of players. They pretty much all involved third parties and a lot of power roles. What about you?BuJaber wrote:Betiko how much experience with mafia do you have?
Like a rough estimate of games played anywhere not just here.

Are you asking me to give a universal key to reading Pika? I don't know. I've always had a hard time reading him. I'm not too fond of the D1 figuring out shite because it makes you seem active even if you aren't looking for scum (or however you wanna phrase it), but loads of other people like it, so I guess it's not alignment indicative. I have no solid or even close to solid reads on anyone. I tend to agree with Aage, but always wary of him, too, because he's a skilled player and has a Danish old-dude name.BuJaber wrote:Rags how do you read pika?
Yoshi - is the deadline still 30th or will there be an extension to accomodate LC learning the ropes?



dakky21 wrote:In a vanilla game like this you can't really weed out those who are least likely to help us to lynch mafia. Or at least not yet. It's still Day 1 and still is a joke vote phase, so any current votes are not really important. Me voting Mitch is normal for every game with him, while votes on me are jokes as well.
The non-joking part: I believe DoomYoshi didn't put as mafia someone from the regulars and gave a daychat, I believe scum will be someone from your lines, "newbies"... this mafia was made to invite new players and I think scum must be someone new, because how would you otherwise attract a new players unless you give them overpowered roles?
I'm willing to vote for either robellis, djelebert, betiko or loose cannon.
I'll give you an argument: I am a vanilla town and whoever gives you an argument will probably be lynched next but will also probably be town. So if you're scum, you're lucky, because town doesn't sees it.robellis00 wrote:My feelings have not changed on Mitch, but the case against Dakky is pretty strong at this point. I would hate to miss the opportunity to eliminate mafia scum. Anyone have any other convincing argument against Dakky to push my vote towards him?
You are right that it doesn't make sense that they would be trying to get each other out. I think Mitch is being either deceptive or misleading with his information, but that just appears to be his style. Like you pointed out and I agreed, maybe Mitch is just wrong in his approach. I think Dakky is trying to cover up something, which is why he offered some information, then didn't follow through. This is why I called for more information in order to change my vote.BuJaber wrote:Rob you think dakky is scum and mitch is scum?
So you think scum mitch is bussing his partner this early in the game? Doesn't make a lot of sense for both to be scum.
