Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:A census for Christmas? Who ever heard of a government office opened on Christmas day? The story must be bologna.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Of course it wasn't on THAT DAY. But people do tend to travel on the holidays.DoomYoshi wrote:A census for Christmas? Who ever heard of a government office opened on Christmas day? The story must be bologna.

Genesis 22:1 - God tested Abraham and said to him "Abraham!" and he said "Here am I."2dimes wrote:
I agree with symmetry. (yeah I know) The bad thing about chapter and verse is that people isolate small bits, then often take them out of context.
Great for making funny quotes or pretending someone agrees with you. Horrible for trying to understand what was actually intended as a whole.
2dimes wrote:Why do you write before the quote?The point of chapter and verse is to easily find a part for discussion.jusplay4fun wrote:As far as I know, all modern Bibles and Bible translations now use Chapter and Verse divisions and notation. Please read from Wikipeadia:
"The Bible was divided into chapters in the 13th century by Stephen Langton and it was divided into verses in the 16th century by French printer Robert Estienne[15] and is now usually cited by book, chapter, and verse. The division of the Hebrew Bible into verses is based on the sof passuk cantillation mark used by the 10th-century Masoretes to record the verse divisions used in earlier oral traditions."
JP4F
Symmetry wrote:DY- Parables are the best thing in Christianity, IMHO- they are open to question. I kind of like Buddhists Koans for the same reason.
"Luke 2:1" indicates that you prefer a one of the Bibles divided into chapter and verse, right?
I agree with symmetry. (yeah I know) The bad thing about chapter and verse is that people isolate small bits, then often take them out of context.
Great for making funny quotes or pretending someone agrees with you. Horrible for trying to understand what was actually intended as a whole.
As far as I know, all modern Bibles and Bible translations now use Chapter and Verse divisions and notation. Please read from Wikipeadia:jusplay4fun wrote:You are not lucid.
JP4F
2dimes wrote:Why do you write before the quote?

Generally speaking yes, tho there are specific manuscript studies that are done with no breakdowns of chapter & verse and just the text(s) as a whole2dimes wrote:Who is?As far as I know, all modern Bibles and Bible translations now use Chapter and Verse divisions and notation. Please read from Wikipeadia:jusplay4fun wrote:You are not lucid.
JP4F
2dimes wrote:Why do you write before the quote?
"The Bible was divided into chapters in the 13th century by Stephen Langton and it was divided into verses in the 16th century by French printer Robert Estienne[15] and is now usually cited by book, chapter, and verse. The division of the Hebrew Bible into verses is based on the sof passuk cantillation mark used by the 10th-century Masoretes to record the verse divisions used in earlier oral traditions."
JP4F
I only agree with symmetry that breaking it into chapter and verse often has a negative effect. As b.k. Used to say though, "Tough to put the toothpaste back into the tube."

Hey, this is great Duk, except there is a great deal of nudity including topless female statues. Kind of ironic isn't it?Dukasaur wrote:

When reading a bible I don't pay any attention to the chapter and verse numbers. If I had a version without them I can't imagine it would read any different.IcePack wrote:Generally speaking yes, tho there are specific manuscript studies that are done with no breakdowns of chapter & verse and just the text(s) as a whole2dimes wrote:I only agree with symmetry that breaking it into chapter and verse often has a negative effect. As b.k. Used to say though, "Tough to put the toothpaste back into the tube."

You kids with your plastic toothpaste tubes. Try it with the metal ones from the seventies and before smart Alec.betiko wrote:i think i could put toothpaste back in the tube by having it in my mouth and blowing it back in. being careful not to push some air in obviously. i guess that if you don't moisture the touthpaste too much in your mouth it's kind of okay.
There is what they call "Reader's Bibles" that don't have verse divisions. I imagine that reading an English translation of one without chapters would feel overwhelming, as there would be pages after page of just text with no real place to pause.2dimes wrote:I love Honeymoon Suite.
Interesting to see a few Hindu images in there. They have some gods that are Elehants and stuff but... we'll ignore that then?
When reading a bible I don't pay any attention to the chapter and verse numbers. If I had a version without them I can't imagine it would read any different.IcePack wrote:Generally speaking yes, tho there are specific manuscript studies that are done with no breakdowns of chapter & verse and just the text(s) as a whole2dimes wrote:I only agree with symmetry that breaking it into chapter and verse often has a negative effect. As b.k. Used to say though, "Tough to put the toothpaste back into the tube."