Moderator: Clan Directors
game finished, end result is 8-4benga wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/public.php?mode=showclanwar&ClanWarId=2679
still one game ongoing

Thanks for contacting me, they should be created + invited nowbenga wrote:We are still waiting for fall to make their games

FALL vs GON ended 5:7 but 3 of GON players(Ragot25,Frank Marteljusplay4fun) have 3/5 games(the players have second, third and fourth winning percentage for GON). It turn out that this was probably the main reason why FALL lost that match and with that RL. In my eyes it will be fair for some matches to be replayed so the winning clan will have clean undisputed title.uckuki wrote: VII. Players
- Maximum 4 games per player, 2 Home 2 Away. Teams can negotiate to remove the home/away split
- Organizers will not count participants. Teams have to notify us if there is a violation
- Offended team will have a choice of selecting game(s) in violation to be remade, or to leave things as they are#
- 1 Clan rule in effect – a player can play for only one clan during competition
- For a player to be eligible for medal standard rulings are enforced
# Rule amendment: teams need to notice the violation and make their decision on time, before the end of Round 1 at the latest.

Was this raised at the time ? It's up to clan leaders to check that their opposition is abiding by the rules.GoranZ wrote:FALL vs GON ended 5:7 but 3 of GON players(Ragot25,Frank Marteljusplay4fun) have 3/5 games(the players have second, third and fourth winning percentage for GON). It turn out that this was probably the main reason why FALL lost that match and with that RL. In my eyes it will be fair for some matches to be replayed so the winning clan will have clean undisputed title.uckuki wrote: VII. Players
- Maximum 4 games per player, 2 Home 2 Away. Teams can negotiate to remove the home/away split
- Organizers will not count participants. Teams have to notify us if there is a violation
- Offended team will have a choice of selecting game(s) in violation to be remade, or to leave things as they are#
- 1 Clan rule in effect – a player can play for only one clan during competition
- For a player to be eligible for medal standard rulings are enforced
# Rule amendment: teams need to notice the violation and make their decision on time, before the end of Round 1 at the latest.
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2587




All depends how on time is defined... we reported it when we notice it. Its not that we have abundance of time to check every clan for not playing according to the rules.Keefie wrote:Was this raised at the time ? It's up to clan leaders to check that their opposition is abiding by the rules.GoranZ wrote:FALL vs GON ended 5:7 but 3 of GON players(Ragot25,Frank Marteljusplay4fun) have 3/5 games(the players have second, third and fourth winning percentage for GON). It turn out that this was probably the main reason why FALL lost that match and with that RL. In my eyes it will be fair for some matches to be replayed so the winning clan will have clean undisputed title.uckuki wrote: VII. Players
- Maximum 4 games per player, 2 Home 2 Away. Teams can negotiate to remove the home/away split
- Organizers will not count participants. Teams have to notify us if there is a violation
- Offended team will have a choice of selecting game(s) in violation to be remade, or to leave things as they are#
- 1 Clan rule in effect – a player can play for only one clan during competition
- For a player to be eligible for medal standard rulings are enforced
# Rule amendment: teams need to notice the violation and make their decision on time, before the end of Round 1 at the latest.
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2587
Its not that we lost in our duel vs OSAjosko.ri wrote:This match was played more than 7 months ago so you could see at that time and report breaking of the rules. You did it only now when you see that you lost the race for title in direct match vs OSA.

Goran,GoranZ wrote:All depends how on time is defined... we reported it when we notice it. Its not that we have abundance of time to check every clan for not playing according to the rules.Keefie wrote:Was this raised at the time ? It's up to clan leaders to check that their opposition is abiding by the rules.GoranZ wrote:FALL vs GON ended 5:7 but 3 of GON players(Ragot25,Frank Marteljusplay4fun) have 3/5 games(the players have second, third and fourth winning percentage for GON). It turn out that this was probably the main reason why FALL lost that match and with that RL. In my eyes it will be fair for some matches to be replayed so the winning clan will have clean undisputed title.uckuki wrote: VII. Players
- Maximum 4 games per player, 2 Home 2 Away. Teams can negotiate to remove the home/away split
- Organizers will not count participants. Teams have to notify us if there is a violation
- Offended team will have a choice of selecting game(s) in violation to be remade, or to leave things as they are#
- 1 Clan rule in effect – a player can play for only one clan during competition
- For a player to be eligible for medal standard rulings are enforced
# Rule amendment: teams need to notice the violation and make their decision on time, before the end of Round 1 at the latest.
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2587
Its not that we lost in our duel vs OSAjosko.ri wrote:This match was played more than 7 months ago so you could see at that time and report breaking of the rules. You did it only now when you see that you lost the race for title in direct match vs OSA.In reality we were as close to winning it as for them to draw it. The problem was that we were little bit further from winning it then they were from drawing it.
I hope you realize how lame is the excuse "you notice it too late" since we are talking about 25% disputed games in our match with GON. Thats like mixing West with South.

CL is HUGE difference... we were forfeited a game for making a non intentional mistake with TOP(I believe GON has done non intentional mistake also). I know this because josko.ri was very unhappy with that ruling of game forfeit.Keefie wrote:Goran,
As with Clan League, if a game is to be remade the issue should be raised with the TO as early as possible, usually before the end of round 1 or 2. Days, weeks and months later isn't going to cut any ice with anyone. Sorry mate, you missed the bus with this.
TOP noticed the mistake immediately while you noticed the mistake after 7 months. THAT is huge difference. And timing of you report sounds like that was your plan B. If you win ardennes then nobody ever knows for this but if you lose ardnnes then you desperately try to win on this cheap way. Or why else is timing of your report just a day after the ardennes was lost?GoranZ wrote:CL is HUGE difference... we were forfeited a game for making a non intentional mistake with TOP(I believe GON has done non intentional mistake also). I know this because josko.ri was very unhappy with that ruling of game forfeit.Keefie wrote:Goran,
As with Clan League, if a game is to be remade the issue should be raised with the TO as early as possible, usually before the end of round 1 or 2. Days, weeks and months later isn't going to cut any ice with anyone. Sorry mate, you missed the bus with this.
Here in RL there is no even game remade, thus I will dispute the RL outcome and I will be correct![]()
After all 1/4 problematic games is surprisingly huge percentage. As for comparison acceptable industrial mistake is still single digit percent.

I believe I posted when I notice the mistake...josko.ri wrote:TOP noticed the mistake immediately while you noticed the mistake after 7 months. THAT is huge difference. And timing of you report sounds like that was your plan B. If you win ardennes then nobody ever knows for this but if you lose ardnnes then you desperately try to win on this cheap way. Or why else is timing of your report just a day after the ardennes was lost?GoranZ wrote:CL is HUGE difference... we were forfeited a game for making a non intentional mistake with TOP(I believe GON has done non intentional mistake also). I know this because josko.ri was very unhappy with that ruling of game forfeit.Keefie wrote:Goran,
As with Clan League, if a game is to be remade the issue should be raised with the TO as early as possible, usually before the end of round 1 or 2. Days, weeks and months later isn't going to cut any ice with anyone. Sorry mate, you missed the bus with this.
Here in RL there is no even game remade, thus I will dispute the RL outcome and I will be correct![]()
After all 1/4 problematic games is surprisingly huge percentage. As for comparison acceptable industrial mistake is still single digit percent.
As with any war I'm making quick overview what we could have done better(what lessons need to be learned). Obviously there were not a lot of lessons for the matches with OSA, S&M and ATL so I went with GON since I expected to find a lot of lessons there(or maybe notGoranZ wrote:All depends how on time is defined... we reported it when we notice it. Its not that we have abundance of time to check every clan for not playing according to the rules.Keefie wrote:Was this raised at the time ? It's up to clan leaders to check that their opposition is abiding by the rules.
forgot about uckuki and Keefie running the whole thingRobespierre__ wrote:Come on GoranZ ..... show some class. You are better than to complain about this -- especially after the time Uckuki spent putting this together. You all should beat GON with their playing their best players in every game.
Robes
- Maximum 4 games per player, 2 Home 2 Away. Teams can negotiate to remove the home/away split
- Organizers will not count participants. Teams have to notify us if there is a violation
- Offended team will have a choice of selecting game(s) in violation to be remade, or to leave things as they are#
# Rule amendment: teams need to notice the violation and make their decision on time, before the end of Round 1 at the latest.