Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

I am sure that I will not start new games in first 2-3 weeks in May, besides the ones which I will play as part of my ongoing tournaments because I want to focus my time on new job.iAmCaffeine wrote:Now a captain. You're so proud you're delusional.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 6#p4932746iAmCaffeine wrote:So on that basis, in May, you won't have enough time to get a medal on the most improved leaderboard. Let's see what happens.josko.ri wrote:I choose which maps I am playing based by my availability. For example, I start new job on May 1 so I played tons of simple maps in order to achieve Gold Polymorphic medal before that because after May 1 I will not have a lot of free time for CC anymore. I achieved my goal of getting Gold Polymorphic medal on April 30 and since then I will not make any new games on simple maps because my medal hunting goal is achieved.Metsfanmax wrote:Are you choosing the timing of when you switch from playing complicated to simple maps in such a way that you personally benefit from the timing?josko.ri wrote:Losing points is not a goal, it is consequence or side effect of changing way of playing from complicated to simple maps. In one hand playing simpler maps is beneficial for getting medal hunting quickly (and that is why I am doing it) while in the other hand consequence of playing simple maps as Public games is losing many points because lower ranks join games.Donelladan wrote:Well, I only meant, don't try to hide that losing tons of points is at your advantage, and that you are using this as a technique to get the most improved medal.
You said it anyway.
I Don't think I will have enough free time in May to play complicated maps.
I'm curious as to why you didn't mention this from beginning. Your initial reaction was to defend your actions. How peculiar.

Don't be a bigot, you may be misgendering josko. In the past josko has identified as male, in 2017 it pays to check before gendering people. josko has some achievements to be proud of. Whilst we are asking the rules to be enforced so he can't grossly abuse the spirit of the game, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that josko has contributed a lot to the site. The site would be worse off without him.ronc8649 wrote:i think he loves the attention.


The accusation is not valid so that is why I cannot make valid response.iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm so impressed by your achievements in March josko. You won some battle royales and got a score influx, what a shocker. Not once in this thread or in GD have you actually made any kind of valid response to the accusation, btw. Stop denying people the medals they deserve by being pathetic, arrogant and selfish.

Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished

Of course you did not word your accusation better because I did not break any rule so naturally you are unable to prove what is my fault and for what should I be punishediAmCaffeine wrote:Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished
As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.

josko guilty big time of taking advantage of system, system set up for player with honour, take advantage of system in mean way, have no honour, kitten killer have no honour, josko is kitten killerjosko.ri wrote:Of course you did not word your accusation better because I did not break any rule so naturally you are unable to prove what is my fault and for what should I be punishediAmCaffeine wrote:Thanks for admitting you should be punished. You just admitted that, in your toxic opinion, you would be punished had I worded my accusation differently. You made this a great deal easier, which is a very stark contracts to your usual behaviour.josko.ri wrote:You should word your accusation better if you want me to be punished
As for the rest, my posts are extremely clear and the first is concise. You're just refusing to accept it because you have no argument. You're really transparent a lot of the time, though you don't seem to know it. Maybe you think you're so much smarter than others that they can't see through your bullshit and your real motives in the things you do.
I played many 1v1 games with great winning rate of 63%. Am I guilty that CC scoring system is made on the way that someone who achieve 63% winning rate can lose points?

where is the gross abuse ? others have had over 100 games waiting for this point increase. many people when medal chasing lose big points if not then u wouldn't call it medal chasing would you.Rules wrote:
Unwritten Rules
Obviously any gross abuse of the game is forbidden. This includes but is not limited to: throwing games or deliberately benefiting from thrown games, intentional deadbeating, holding players hostage, serial teammate killing, hijacking accounts, systematically "farming" new recruits and colluding with other players in any way to manipulate the scoring system.


Donelladen. Only 29 games can count.Donelladan wrote:Well, while I agree with you Keefie, ( there is no rule breaking, just unethical) eddie's post is inaccurate. There is way more that 95 games to consider.
I won't take my time counting, but josko went from general to capitaine, winning apparently ( he claimed so) 60-70% of his game on doodle and lux, so there is definitely more than 100 games to consider.
You could (not saying it will happen) apply the verdict to this case as well.After evaluating the facts for this case, and I do respect the points from all those who have defended the accused. I also believe that the accused are both one of the few solid players of the website. However, what can not be denied are the games mentioned in this report:If there weren't any sort of game manipulation here, then there was at least an exploitation of when the games ended for the sole purpose of getting in the top ten monthly scoreboard. Even though there is no rule in "slowing" or quickly playing your turns, it's so easy to take control of how a game can be played out. It does look shady but still, for immediately comparing this with a past case involving a scheme that was done in a massive scale is still incomparable and the details of each case are different. Betiko simply wanted to catch up but to suddenly play several games with one player in one day and coincidentally winning many of them just in the nick of time - does look fishy. I strongly advise that for anyone who wants to catch up or improve their ranking on the monthly scoreboard, play with different people and play your games as honestly as one can.Spoiler
Game number(s):
Game 17022225 started 29 Nov, betiko won 20 points on 29 Nov
Game 17022229 started 29 Nov, betiko won 20 points on 29 Nov
Game 17022226 started 29 Nov, betiko won 18 points on 30 Nov
Game 17024412 started 29 Nov, betiko won 19 points on 30 Nov
Game 17024413 started 29 Nov, betiko won 19 points on 30 Nov
Game 17024414 started 29 Nov, betiko won 20 points on 29 Nov
Game 17024416 started 29 Nov, betiko won 19 points on 30 Nov
Game 17022228 fairman will win but in December, still ongoing game because betiko played slow turns when he saw that he will lose.
Game 17022227 fairman will win but in December, still ongoing game because betiko played slow turns when he saw that he will lose.
Game 17024415 fairman won but on Dec 1 because betiko played slow turns when he saw that he will lose.
No one is going to be removed or replaced from the monthly scoreboard out of this but this report should serve as a warning for the accused not to play like in those games again.
That is a point loss for you lol.rockfist wrote:I knew it would probably result in point loss for me but we went 1-1.


