Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team


That is what happens when you put children in charge. Goes straight to their tiny brains. If he spent as much time trying to get a woman as he does being useless on here, he would actually lose his virginity.concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.

I didn't realize we can break rules as long as it doesn't bother anyone.concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.


Good place to flame in middle of C&A.Beast Of Burson wrote:That is what happens when you put children in charge. Goes straight to their tiny brains. If he spent as much time trying to get a woman as he does being useless on here, he would actually lose his virginity.concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.

yeah, this is a real issue and there is an actual rule about the size of sigs. so, it is not a dumb complaint. most members won't remember that sigs were not a real wide spread "thing", until the BpB began to use them in a collective effort to distinguish the clan/clan members within the forums and to essentially "graffiti tag" the forums. yeah, that was the literal intent. to "tag" the forums as much as possible, within the rules. that had never been done before. clan sigs are now a standard thing and don't have the effect they once did, when clans didn't think of doing something like that within the forums, before the bandits.concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.

if by that you mean, "they try to enforce long standing rules that the site has gotten away from," then i agree 100%. if not, let me help you with the rule:Beast Of Burson wrote:That is what happens when you put children in charge.
CC RULES wrote:
- Signature images larger than 150 pixels high by 600 pixels wide just scream “I am compensating for something” and should be reduced in size. Note the dimensions size restriction is only in reference to the image. You may also have 2 additional levels of text / spoilers. In the spoiler below are some examples of acceptable signature configurations
Acceptable Signature Configurations
One line of text
Two lines of text!![]()



+2owenshooter wrote:yeah, this is a real issue and there is an actual rule about the size of sigs. so, it is not a dumb complaint.concrete wrote:REALLY???????
What am I missing here? Why is this a problem for you or anyone else? Who is it bothering if a player has a sig 2 or 3 times the size of someone else? I must be missing the reason behind this. Sounds like a dumb complaint to me.
when sigs are larger than allowed, they clog the forum, they ruin the forum experience, they are ANNOYING. i agree 100% with icepack, because it is an actual RULE that the site has gotten away from enforcing. the site needs to get back to enforcing the rule, because the forums are becoming overrun with them... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir



No idea, larger avatars are blocked but for some reason the signatures are not.Lord Arioch wrote:Question
why is it even possible to load a sig larger than allowed?





The accused are a minority of those that sport a sig. A minority shouldn't force you to not see all of them, except if what the majority does is allowed and you really dont want to see then.Witt13 wrote:So I don't have a signature, never have, and therefore don't have a dog in the fight. But IMO, shouldn't this be treated similar to the whole "foed" tool. If someone annoys you, you are permitted to foe them. If someone's sig annoys you (too big, makes the page to slow to load, doesn't load/look right on your phone), turn off sigs.
Control Panel --> Board Preferences --> Edit Display Options --> Display Signatures Yes/No
Mine has been set to 'No', and therefore is never a problem. No issues with the forums on my phone downloading, etc.
I understand if there is a rule in place against the size (which I personally wasn't aware of), but this to me seems to be a big fuss over something really not that big of a deal. My two cents.

There's no rules about color. I'm fine w thatmrswdk wrote:What about people like Chapcrap, whose sig is the right size but an annoying color?

